NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Apple / Iworld / iPhone

iPhone


Opera Web Browser Denied in the App Store

Seemingly, Apple is set to reject any app that conflicts with its own software offerings

By Filip Truta, Apple News Editor

31st of October 2008, 09:22 GMT

Adjust text size:


Opera Mini promo material / artwork
Enlarge picture
Word on the web is that Apple has refused Opera's proposition to get its web browser on iPhones. Apple has a record of rejecting applications aimed at iPhone use, on the grounds that most of them conflicted with what Apple was already offering.

Opera's CEO Jon Stephenson von Tetzchner reportedly said that “Opera’s engineers have developed a version of Opera Mini that can run on an Apple iPhone, but Apple won’t let the company release it because it competes with Apple’s own Safari browser,” as cited by John Gruber writing for Daring Fireball. This indicates users shouldn't expect Firefox or other web browsers hitting the iTunes App Store anytime soon either.

However, “unlike other rejections, this one is not arbitrary,” the same post reveals. It is a known fact that Apple's SDK agreement with developers strictly and clearly forbids them to write their own JavaScript interpreter. But it's fairly possible that the iPhone version of Opera Mini doesn’t even have a JavaScript engine, the same speculative report reads. Should Opera Mini for iPhone be built “with minimalist rendering in mind... this would be another rejection of an app that doesn’t violate any of the written guidelines,” Gruber concludes.

One of the best known cases of Apple rejecting iPhone apps concerns Podcaster, an app that distributes podcasts. In Apple's opinion, Podcaster replicated iTunes functionality. However, the app's developer noted in a blog post that many apps that made it onto the App Store also replicated Apple's software, and even iTunes.

“Apple had nothing in the terms prohibiting developers from duplicating features currently available on desktop application,” said the developer of Podcaster. “I followed all the guidelines and made sure everything is in the correct place. Yet Apple denies me because I allow users to download podcasts just like iTunes.” Podcaster even sported a feature iTunes didn’t, namely the ability to download podcasts directly to the device, according to its maker.

Are you a fan of the Opera web browser? Do you think Safari is everything iPhone / iPod touch needs to offer a complete web browsing experience?

TAGS:

Opera | Opera browser | web browser | Opera Mini | App Store
Read by 1,868 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Excellent (5.0/5) 1 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Opera 9.62 Fixes History Search Bug on Mac

Quick Tip – Making the Most of Opera's Bookmarks Feature

Opera 9.61 for Mac Is a 'Recommended Security Upgrade' – Download Here

Opera 9.6 for Mac Improves Looks – Download Here

Safari Not Affected by Google's Chrome One Bit

iTunes 8 'Accidentally Leaked'

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Greg Edwards on 31 Oct 2008, 10:42 GMT reply to this comment

I love my iPhone, and my ipod and my imac. I think the built in safari browser on iphone and mac are perfectly adequate for my needs, but I believe it's really bad that apple are dictating what software we can and can't run on our phones. There's no such clause for which browser I choose to use on my desktop, why should my handheld be any different.

It's not like apple are losing money by not allowing other software similar to there own either, quite the opposite.


Comment #2 by: Dels on 31 Oct 2008, 14:03 GMT reply to this comment

@Greg
yes except for its bugs that make it vurnerable, i love WebKit especially on Google Chrome but i loved Opera that has been with me many years both on desktop and mobile phone


Comment #3 by: IncidentFlux on 04 Nov 2008, 10:04 GMT reply to this comment

Opera is the best, in my opinion on mobile and desktop platforms, I've been using it since '98.

Having said that I'm not a fanboy and won't attack other browsers simply because they have their place and are needed for healthy competition. Apple restricting app usage is no different to Microsoft bundling IE in Windows in the early days of the web and gaining an unfair advantage.

This just looks like Apple doesn't have faith in their products and staff to come up with competative apps.


Comment #4 by: Iccicle on 21 Mar 2009, 20:38 GMT reply to this comment

Safar on the iPhone is buggy and crashes a lot. I've used Opera Mini on other handsets and completely loved it. This was way before the current version. It smells anti-competitive tactics and I Apple would be wise in opening up to alternative browsers or Android and the future Symbian (when it becomes fully Open Source) handsets will slowly take over.

I would love my iPhone more if I could download and install Opera Mini as I love the other applications, functionalities and design. But if Apple continues with it's current closed against competing applications strategy, I might consider Android when it becomes available on a decent handset. Why should I have to go to the effort of jailbreaking my phone to take advanage of a great application and increase my productivity and overall experience on the iPhone? It doesn't make sense to me.

(I do not know if Opera Mini is available when jailbreaking iPhone, but the principle applies).

Open up Apple!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM