Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nature

October 27th, 2010, 09:45 GMT · By

One Fifth of Vertebrate Species Threatened with Extinction

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


The Humpback whale is just one of the species threatened with extinction
Enlarge picture
According to a survey presented at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), in Nagoya, Japan, it would appear that 20 percent of all vertebrate on the planet are currently being threatened with extinction.

The work also suggests that current conservation efforts are effective in curbing this trend, in the areas where they were implemented. The situation could have been a lot worse, experts believe.

This investigation was presented to international representatives on October 26 at the 10th CBD Conference of the Parties. The work suggests that wider-scale conservation efforts are needed to sustain healthy animal populations.

For this research, experts used data from the IUCN (International Union for Conservation Nature) Red List of Threatened Species, which covers some 25,000 species of vertebrate animals.

Details of the study appear in the online outlet Science Express, an advanced publication tool for the esteemed journal Science, experts at the Arizona State University (ASU) report.

Animals that made the target of this study included mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and fishes, researchers explain. On average, around half of all mammal, bird and amphibian species are moving closer to extinction every single year .

Studies show that the main factors responsible for this are agricultural expansion, logging, over-exploitation, invasive alien species, and other encroaching human activities.

“The ‘backbone’ of biodiversity is being eroded. One small step up the Red List is one giant leap forward toward extinction. This is just a small window on the global losses currently taking place,” says Harvard University professor Edward O. Wilson, a worldwide renowned ecologist.

“On the one hand, the results are chilling, documenting a trajectory of decline. But, these findings also demonstrate that when guided by detailed data and supported by adequate financing, conservation of threatened species and their habitats can reverse this trend,” says Andrew Smith.

The expert is an ASU conservation biologist, and also the President’s Professor and Parents Professor in the School of Life Sciences, part of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the university.

He is however just one of the 174 authors of the new investigation, which included 115 institutions from around the world. Some 38 countries had representatives in the groups that elaborated this paper.

“The Red List is the gold standard for determining the threat status of the world’s biota – each species has been reviewed comprehensively by experts through a standardized quantitative process,” Smith says.

“And amazingly, this landmark study is the summation of 25,000 of these efforts from around the world,” he goes on to say.




TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

835 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Assessing Our Planet's Biodiversity

Retreating Glaciers Made Room for Biodiversity

A Strategic Approach for Combating Biodiversity Loss

CBD to Decide the Future of Earth's Biodiversity

Biodiversity Played a Huge Role in Evolution

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Mic Hall on 27 Oct 2010, 14:21 UTC reply to this comment

Shouldn't that be about the normal number of species that are threatened under evolutionary processes?
If we tamper with evolution by trying to prevent change aren't we just getting in the way of the process? The change to a species is from less to more successful BECAUSE of the failure of species or unsuccessful adaptations. Even when alters the available food sources or becomes a threat to another species isn't change the method by which evolution reaches the solution. Are we trying to stop evolution just because we like things the way they are?


Comment #2 by: Eric on 27 Oct 2010, 19:27 UTC reply to this comment

As the article noted, many of the reasons for extinction have nothing to do with background processes (the natural background extinction rate), but instead by human processes like resource exploitation or introducing alien species where they do not have a predator.

Normally, evolution does favor those that can adapt and the losers eventually become extinct, but we're talking about extinctions far greater than a natural process, and at a far faster rate. It isn't possible to adapt to big environmental changes like the ones we are causing in a generation or two; it takes time.

It is true that we are getting in the way of the process, but not because of conservation efforts. Instead, we are getting in the way on the other end of the spectrum, causing extinctions that would not otherwise have happened; many looming extinctions aren't caused by natural selection at all, but instead by us. Biodiversity is very important for the survival of humanity, so this isn't a "animal rights" issue, it is a survival issue.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM