NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Technology / Video

Video


Nvidia to Adopt Simple Names for the GeForce Line-up

The current naming scheme causes serious misunderstandings

By Bogdan Botezatu, Hardware Editor

8th of May 2008, 10:23 GMT

Adjust text size:


Nvidia's naming scheme is causing havoc on the market
Enlarge picture
Nvidia could change the naming scheme in its GeForce graphics card line-up, as it reached the conclusion that the current approach may mislead the customer in terms of graphics performance. Although the change is highly unlikely to happen in the near future, the graphics specialist is munching on the idea of bringing order amongst its large GeForce family.

"It's a challenge that we're looking at right now", said Roy Taylor, vice-president of Content Business Development at Nvidia, quoted by tech website Games Industry. "There is a need to simplify it for consumers, there's no question... we think that the people who understand and know GeForce today, they're OK with it - they understand it. But if we're going to widen our appeal, there's no doubt that we have to solve that problem", he continued.

While hardware enthusiasts and tech journalists have no problem in distinguishing between various graphics card models and configurations, the average user is less likely to match a certain card name with its graphics performance without looking it up on the Internet.

Nvidia's nomination scheme is pretty straightforward as far as the GPU series are concerned. The real complications occur when the user has to choose between graphics models, such as GS, GT, GTX, GE and GSO. For instance, a graphics card built with the 7800 graphics core can deliver more computing power than an 8400 counterpart. However, the additional model prefixes do not detail on the actual graphics performance and Nvidia could use the number of shader units instead, for instance.

Nvidia is not the only company to have messed up the whole numbering process. AMD made the same mistake with its processors, which led to significant confusion when compared to Intel's counterparts. AMD's previous naming system would distinguish the CPUs by family and clock frequency (Athlon XP 1700+, for instance), but it lost significant ground on the processor market.

TAGS:

Nvidia | GeForce | Naming | AMD | CPU
Read by 912 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Fair (2.5/5) 6 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Nvidia Trumpets Death of the CPU

Nvidia Rushes GT-200 Introduction, Goes Online in July

Nvidia to Introduce Monolithic Chipset for Intel Mobile Processors

Nvidia's 9400/9500 Cards, Postponed by the 8600GTs

Nvidia Tesla GPGPU Shows Up in Bull's NovaScale Supercomputer

PhysX, Running in a GeForce Card Near You

MSI's Motherboards Come With Full 125-Watt CPU Support

XFX Unveils G92-Based Black Edition Graphics Cards

1 Beyond Unveils Military-Grade Notebooks

Asus Touts New Desktop PC to the Eee Lineup

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Mr. Cambron on 08 May 2008, 16:38 GMT reply to this comment

dang finally they get the idea or what ?? right now nvidia, ati, amd all confuses me with the names they have

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM