Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > CPU

September 22nd, 2012, 00:21 GMT · By

Nvidia Working on Project Boulder

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Nvidia Tesla Server
Enlarge picture
We know that Nvidia has been working on project Denver for quite some time now. Denver is supposed to be a GPU that also has an ARM CPU fused on the same die, thus making the final chip able to run an operating system directly on the GPU with no need for an AMD or Intel processor.

The first implementation of the Denver project will be next year’s Maxwell. Many say that Maxwell is a 2014 GPU, but we know that ARM is especially built to be easily fused with various architectures. As such, we believe that at least the prototypes will come out during 2013.

The Denver architecture is a 64-bit design that’s based on the ARMv8 set.

It seems that Nvidia is not going directly for ARM CPU + Nvidia GPU integrated solution.

On its road towards Maxwell, the company is also reportedly working on Project Boulder and this is somewhat unexpected as Boulder is exactly the opposite of Maxwell.

Maxwell will add a few ARM cores to a GPU to make it capable of running an operating system.

Boulder, on the other hand, will use large ARM cores that will provide significant out-of-order (OOO) general purpose computing performance and we don’t yet know if it will also have an integrated graphics processing unit (iGPU).

Basically, Boulder seems to be willing to go against AMD’s Opteron and Intel’s Xeon processors and, unlike some solutions from the two CPU giants, we don’t know if a GPU will also be included on the design.

Readers should take note that “large ARM cores” refer to a full 64-bit implementation of ARM Cortex A15 or an even more complex design.

We believe that this is an important mention as many ARM licensees such as Qualcomm or Apple have actually simplified the Cortex A15 design before integrating it into their mobile processors.

It’s understandable that the two companies will take this route as their main goal is low power consumption while Cortex A15 has lots of server features that are not actually needed in a smartphone design.

Nvidia
will likely design a complete Cortex A15 implementation or even a more complex one with several FPU units and differential clocking of the integer units.


2,394 hits · 1 comment
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Nvidia Tegra 5 Is a 20nm Design That Won’t Be Made at TSMC

Intel Admits ARM’s Method Is the Best One

GlobalFoundries Announces 14nm-XM 3D FinFET Manufacturing

AMD Hondo APU in Action – Benchmarks Two Times Faster than Intel’s Atom

Intel’s Atom Windows 8 Tablets Seem Destined to Fail

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: defderdar on 24 Sep 2012, 20:16 UTC reply to this comment

Nvidia cant implement an 64bit instruction set based on Cortex A15, it is beyond their capabilities. There is no hard macro with more than 4core for A9, and it is same for A15 too. It needs some kind of very specialized work and lots of differentiation to make more than 4 cores, despite that they are specified from ARM as 4 cores. Only Applied Micro says that they have a working concept of ArmV8 based chip/board, which is similar to Calxeda's Energycore but much more of it. It has some special interconnect bus and module/core system similar to one on AMD's FX' chips. Applied Micro says, their module system is scalable so there no hard limited 4 core or so solutions. Nvidia may want to shoot same, but they are very behind of Applied Micro.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM