Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Webmaster > Google News

June 6th, 2007, 20:06 GMT · By Bogdan Popa

No More Elvis on YouTube

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


YouTube's sports category
Enlarge picture
Numerous French sports groups filed a complaint against the search giant Google, accusing the company for copyright infringement after several clips were published on the online video
sharing service YouTube. The French national tennis organization and Ligue 1, the soccer league, claims that YouTube posted clips on the official page without their approval. Nothing new, you'll say, YouTube is quite used with the lawsuits filed for company infringement, so what's the point? Well, it seems like several organizations are interested to join the class action against Google, the most famous being Cherry Lane Music Publishing, the company that owns the rights for all the Elvis clips.

According to afterdawn.com, the New-York based company is owning approximately 65,000 copyrights, that means almost the same amount of clips affected by the Viacom removal. As you might know, the MTV owner required the search giant Google to delete almost 100,000 clips from the page because they were uploaded without their authorization.

"We formed a firm conclusion that on Google and YouTube there is rampant copyright infringement," Louis Solomon, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the suit, said according to the same source. "We think it's wrong and are eager for a judge to decide the issue."

As always, YouTube is protected by the DMCA, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, that sustains the online video sharing service can't be accused of copyright infringement as most of the clips are uploaded by ordinary Internet users. Because it's extremely difficult to charge and demand damages from an ordinary Internet user, most of the victims are filing lawsuits against the parent company Google.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

4,092 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Viacom Finally Sued YouTube!

YouTube Users Sue Viacom!

Viacom Presents YouTube Case Details

YouTube Turns Into A Paranoiac Service

UTube Earns Money After YouTube Suit

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Billy Rebel on 19 Sep 2008, 06:35 UTC reply to this comment

As an affected party myself, I support this. The Google search mechanisms should not allow for names to be added which are ALREADY ESTABLISHEDTHERE. I was the original musician Billy Rebel on Google searches, Now OTHERS have stolen my identity and appear as well. this causes grave problems, as can well be imagined....loss of time and resources to attempt an elimination of the IMPOSTERS, confusion as well among my fan base, financial dilemma, and so on.All entitities must be held accountable for their actions. The Millenium Act thus promotes further actions and aggravation among the parties affected. I do not believe that it relieves the responsibility of search engines to act accordingly and allow IMPOSTERS who in fact are GUILTY of IDENTITY THEFT, to appear in searches.

Thank-You

Billy Rebel


Comment #2 by: rebecca on 16 Nov 2010, 03:47 UTC reply to this comment

I am certain Google knows better than to
discard Elvis You Tube. Google is aware
that they are discarding their own clientele, their own customers, by doing so. Google should be given more time to
think it over or else their business will
be OVER too.

Rebecca

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM