Controversial mother of 14 comes under heavy fire for seeing state assistance

Apr 2, 2012 14:25 GMT  ·  By
Octomom Nadya Suleman becomes target of death threats after word gets out she's back on welfare
   Octomom Nadya Suleman becomes target of death threats after word gets out she's back on welfare

Though she promised she'd never do it again, Nadya Suleman is back on welfare, receiving $2,000 (€1,497.4) a month in food stamps from the State of California. Taxpayers are none too happy about that, it has emerged.

TMZ reports that, shortly after word got out that the mother of 14 was again living off the state, she started receiving death threats.

Apparently, people are not pleased with the idea of having to pay Suleman to provide for her 14 children, all of whom she had by IVF when she knew there would be no father around and, more importantly, no considerable means to support such a large family.

Right now, Suleman is being attacked from all sides, on all channels available, the celebrity e-zine reports.

“Our sources say Nadya Suleman started getting angry and threatening phone calls from blocked numbers, emails, and Facebook messages,” TMZ says.

Most messages wish Suleman dead, while others take the time to explain why she doesn't “deserve” to live.

“Die [expletive]. I’m not working for your [expletive]-ing kids, you’re the one that wanted them,” one message says, as cited by the same media outlet.

“You're going to get yours,” unknown callers told her over the phone, before she had time to hang up.

“I'm not working to [expletive]-ing pay...,” “[Expletive] you, you don't deserve...,” other callers told her before they were cut off.

“According to our sources, Octomom's actually received a few positive messages too – single mothers praising her for not letting pride stop her from doing what they believe is right for her children,” TMZ notes.

As we also reported earlier today, contacted by paparazzi from the aforementioned agency, Suleman defended herself, saying she'd only turned to state assistance because she had no other means available to put food on the table for the kids.

She believes that this shouldn't be a problem with taxpayers, who should rather take offense at those who get into the system and never leave it, without as much as trying to get a job.