Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Space

August 5th, 2009, 13:06 GMT · By

NASA Finishes Ion Propulsion System Test Runs

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) ion thruster in operation
Enlarge picture
A couple of decades ago, it became ominously clear to NASA engineers that they would no longer be able to sustain long-term missions in outer space using the same type of fuels they were employing at the time. Thus, the idea of ion propulsion was born. Originating more than 50 years ago, it first flew in 1998, and then again in 2007. Now, experts at the space agency's Glenn Research Center, in Cleveland, Ohio, have announced the successful completion of lab testing procedures for a new ion engine.

Deep Space 1 was the first space probe to be powered by an ion propulsion system, with the Ceres-bound Dawn mission following in 2007. Essentially, the system relies on ionizing gas inside a special chamber, utilizing power from the solar panels of the spacecraft carrying it. The ionized (electrically charged) gas is then fired at the back of the motor, which ensures a steady and very smooth push. The new design fresh out of Glenn is both lighter and more powerful than its two predecessors, which also means that it can travel faster over long distances.

The Dawn mission, for example, is headed to the dwarf planet Ceres. After it will survey this formation for a while, it will break orbit, and head for the asteroid Vesta, in the inner asteroid belt, where it will also perform scientific measurements. It is scheduled to reach its first destination in a couple of years, after having successfully made a slingshot maneuver around Mars.

Speaking about the new engine, NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) principal investigator Michael Patterson says that, “We made it physically bigger, but lighter, reduced the system's complexity to extend its lifetime, and, overall, improved its efficiency.” MIT aeronautics and astronautics department researchers add that, “You are limited in what you can bring to space because you have to carry a rocket that is mostly fuel. You have to compensate for the weight and size of the propellant tanks by building a spacecraft that is flimsy or does not have many structures to reinforce it.”

A paper describing the new engine layout and configuration has been presented at the Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, which is held this week in Denver, the US. According to it, experts at Glenn would require about 36 months to complete a full ion thruster, if work starts as early as 2010. They believe that the new version will be able to provide more thrust for future spaceships, and will be able to propel them faster and farther through space, Technology Review informs.

ASA’s new ion-propulsion system is undergoing testing at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA
Enlarge picture
An ion propulsion system test for Deep Space 1
Enlarge picture

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,356 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


New Ion Trap Senses Forces and Redirects Photons

Experts Find Brain Area Where Alcohol Acts

New Element Added to the Periodic Table

GOCE Handles Itself Beautifully in Orbit

GOCE's Ion Thruster Is Now Online

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Mohan on 23 Aug 2010, 04:50 UTC reply to this comment

I have read about Ion propulsion long
back (1980s), News paper articles only
gave a vague idea at that time. Now
it is here. Since I was a teenager (1969)
I was interested in space research as
a lay-man.
I want to convey an idea on creating
artificial gravity. I think we do not
have to spin the whole spacecraft for
it. Why not spin the crew area of the
spacecraft (like an automobile gears)
inside and let go the craft without
the exterior rotating. Only the inner
compartment of crew area must be
made to spin. Hope my idea is
not crazy. MOHAN K SUBRAMANIAM, BANGALORE, INDIA
mohanks81@gmail.com

Comment #1.1 by: Geode on 06 Oct 2010, 01:35 GMT

If you are reffering to using centrifugal force to generate an artificial gravity, I know this has been thoerized - and if it is not in use then I am sure there is a reason. I suspect the reason has more to do with our lack of a need for long-term missions that would justify such an expense.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM