NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Internet Explorer

Internet Explorer


Mozilla Says It's a Shame IE's Performance Is Falling so Far Behind

And can't keep up

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

10th of September 2008, 17:32 GMT

Adjust text size:


IE - Firefox - Chrome
Enlarge picture
With the advent of Google Chrome, Firefox 3.1 Alpha and Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2, the browser wars have been virtually revitalized, with a strong focus on the horsepower delivered by each product, and especially in terms of JavaScript performance. Asa Dotzler, Mozilla's director of community development, has come out gunning for Microsoft, because the Redmond company failed to make public its JavaScript benchmarks in the same manner as open source projects, mentioning Apple's SunSpider, Google's V8 Benchmark, and Mozilla's Dromaeo.

“The open source engines are rockin' the speed game and the closed engines are falling very far behind very quickly. It looks to me like the closed and proprietary guys just can't keep up. It's actually a shame that they're falling so far behind. It would be helpful for the Web if the IE team was able to make some serious JS improvements for 8 and whatever comes next because there are still a significant number of users stuck on Microsoft's technology,” Dotzler stated.

Microsoft did reveal details related to the JavaScript enhancements that have been integrated into Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2, but the software giant has not made any benchmark results available to the public. In the past, IE Program Manager Christian Stockwell indicated that, while IE8's JavaScript engine had indeed evolved, Microsoft's focus with kicking up a notch the performance of Internet Explorer was on the browser as a web platform, and not on a specific aspect.

“Their falling behind won't completely stop the Web from moving forward though. There's enough momentum behind the truly modern browsers, Firefox leading the way with 20% of the market, that the Web will get better without them. IE market share will continue to deteriorate, probably at a somewhat faster rate, as users flee for a better experience. And MS will no doubt slow things down at least some so I really do hope they improve. The less of a drag they are the better,” Dotzler added. 

Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 is available for download here.

Firefox 3.1 Alpha 1 for Windows is available for download here.

Firefox 3.1 Alpha 1 for Linux is available for download here.

Firefox 3.1 Alpha 1 for Mac OS X is available for download here.

TAGS:

Firefox | IE8 | Google Chrome | JavaScript
Read by 3,191 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Poor (1.0/5) 1 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


IE8 Beta 2 vs. Google Browser (Chrome) vs. Firefox 3.1 Alpha 2 RC

Microsoft Translator Is Live

Google Browser (Chrome) Not Just an IE Killer, a Windows Killer Too

Resource Hogs: Google Chrome and IE8 Beta 2 Compared to Firefox 3.0.1

IE8 Beta 2 Machine Translation Accelerator

Final IE8 Confirmed for November, Possibly November 1

IE8 Beta 2 Usage Share Up 500% Compared to Beta 1

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Abraham Barrientos on 10 Sep 2008, 20:32 GMT reply to this comment

I used to a IE user, but since 2006 I changed to Firefox, the improvement in performance was great at that time. Yesterday I downloaded Chrome and from my opinion is way faster and easier. Nevertheless Google has to work a little bit more to improve some aspects, like font size and features for the disabled. Good luck to you all, I stick with Google.


Comment #2 by: Dr. Fidd on 11 Sep 2008, 01:38 GMT reply to this comment

Is browser performance really an issue for the every day user? Not only do the majority of web users not understand or care about performance differences between browsers, but this problem becomes less and less obvious as desktop performance inevitably increases.

As usual, the open source projects focus on elements that pertain primarily to their very minority demographic while slamming anything that doesn't share the same ideology. Hell, when you say it that way, it doesn't sound all that open, does it?


Comment #3 by: Opera user on 11 Sep 2008, 07:23 GMT reply to this comment

Yeah, even on my 2-year old Intel Core 2 E6300 CPU (probably current cheaper model like E4XXX may outperform it), I can't really notice a big differences in the performaces of all the browsers. Currently Opera is my main browser but I also have IE 8 Beta 2, FireFox and Safari installed. The reason I use Opera for my main browser, is that it has the features I need, not because it has faster Javascript engine. Speed? Just buy a new cheap CPU and memory module. That's not a problem. But when it doesn't have the feature you need, it will cost your precious time that cannot be ever bought with money. Personally, I think IE 8 beta 2 is good enough, for it has new features that saves MY time, not CPU time.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM