OK, yesterday it was a disaster, today it is the best console of 2006. That's what you get when the market is packed with platforms that try to make it to the top. But that is not the case for 2006 as only 2 new platforms were trying to make it to the top.

Having the consuming public to thank for the success or failure of a product such as this, specs and features should really be more accessible, or at least be presented objectively more often, in order to make an impression on the product.

The positive news about PS3 today come from IGN: "Judging the consoles based upon a broad perspective that includes software now available and coming in the future an entirely different argument could be formulated. However, from a hardware perspective, the PS3 is by far the more interesting console. Though the launch software hasn't blown anyone away, the 360's launch titles were equally unimpressive..." There you go: "the 360's launch titles were equally unimpressive".

Continuing with its point of view: "