NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / MSN

MSN


Microsoft: We Are Not Ripping Off Users

With MSN Premium

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

4th of January 2008, 11:50 GMT

Adjust text size:


MSN Premium
Enlarge picture
Microsoft reacted to reports comparing MSN Premium with Windows Live Hotmail, defending its subscription web-based service centered around email. The reaction from the Redmond company came to criticism that the features, functionality and capabilities it is offering via MSN Premium for approximately $10 per month have equivalents that are available free of charge to all Windows Live Hotmail users running either Windows XP or Windows Vista. Of course, Microsoft has rejected the criticism claiming that there are multiple reasons why MSN Premium users are charged for the service. As a consequence, the company has explained the subtle differences between what MSN Premium has to offer and what Windows Live Mail brings to the table.

"MSN Premium was designed to appeal to a different audience than the free Windows Live services and we continue to support this service and our subscribers. MSN Premium
offers customers a single integrated client experience that simplifies web access, multiple accounts, service integration, and access to information via the 'Dashboard'. While Windows Live includes many comparable services, MSN Premium includes software as part of the subscription, including Encarta Premium, and offers additional functionality such as download manager and SpySweeper. Many customers are also attracted to MSN Premium's advertisement-free experience, while Windows Live services are ad-funded", Microsoft replied as cited by SeattlePI.

The MSN Premium - Windows Live Hotmail measuring contest can swing either way, with strong arguments to support both services. Of course, the fact that MSN Premium comes with a subscription-based model is an advantage for some users who do not want to be hassled by advertising. A luxury that Windows Live Hotmail users can only permit themselves with Hotmail Plus, which costs almost double compared to MSN Premium. At the same time, MSN Premium, in the context of the much fresher Windows Live Hotmail, is nothing but an outdated service, whose faults will end up surpassing its benefits. And MSN Premium has quite a few faults, starting with the aging browsing client and ending up with the limited amount of storage. 10 GB might be more than Windows Live Messenger's 5 GB, but Google is catching up with Gmail already offering 6 GB, while Yahoo has already been offering unlimited storage space.

TAGS:

Windows Live Hotmail | MSN Premium | Microsoft


Rating:
Fair (2.6/5) 6 vote(s) so far    

Read by 0 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article
Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2008 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


New Beta Version of Windows Live OneCare 2.0 Available

Play the Stock Market - Courtesy of Microsoft

No Search Market Share Present for Microsoft this Year

That's It! No More Windows Live Messenger 9.0 Beta for You!

Windows Live Hotmail Will Continue to Evolve in 2008

Rihanna - Good Girl Gone Bad Exclusively for Microsoft

Why Did Microsoft Move Away from MSN to Windows Live Hotmail?

Windows Live Hotmail FAQ

No, Windows Live Messenger 9 Does Not Integrate with IM Clients Beyond Yahoo Messenger

Aren't You Dying to Be Microsoft's Biggest Loser?

Microsoft Reloads the Windows Vista Wow

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Zeke on 04 Jan 2008, 13:46 GMT reply to this comment

MSN Premium is garbage, it contains 1 item I want to use but I refuse to pay that price per month.

Hotmail Plus is a yearly payment of $20 or something, which I don't mind paying. But Hotmail Plus should also contain the ability to sync calendars. If you want that, you need MSN Premium... which isn't enough to make me stomach the monthly payment for all the other crap that comes with it.


Comment #2 by: sky on 24 Jul 2008, 15:01 GMT reply to this comment

i think that it is wrong that you get charged for something you can't use that often because of work

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 






SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM