Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Security

August 21st, 2010, 11:31 GMT · By

Microsoft Security Essentials vs. Kaspersky, Avast, BitDefender, Avira, Symantec, McAfee, AVG, Panda

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0
Enlarge picture
Microsoft Security Essentials, a free security offering designed for genuine versions of Windows platforms, has received an accolade from AV-Test recently, after it managed to pass the same range of tests as commercial antivirus products.

AV-Test.org evaluated no less than 19 security solutions in the second quarter of 2010, namely in April, May and June. Version 1.0 of Microsoft Security Essentials was among the 13 products which received the AV-Test certification with a total score of 14, out of 18 possible.

In fact, AV-Test certified all the products tested as long as they managed to achieve an overall score at least 12, with a maximum of 6 points granted for each of the areas evaluated: protection, repair and usability.

32-bit (x86) copies of Windows 7 were used for all the tests, which involved only the latest versions of the AV products. According to AV-Test, all security solutions had access to updates as well as to any Cloud services used to enhance their capabilities.

There were products that failed to hit the total score of 12 necessary to receive the AV-Test certification, most notably McAfee Internet Security 2010 with a score of just 10.5 and Trend Micro Internet Security Pro 2010 with 11.5.

The score of Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 wasn’t one of the highest, 4 points short of the maximum, but still, the Redmond company’s security solution managed to hold its own against full security suites.

Fact is, that even when the software giant introduced Morro, the codename used for what was to become Microsoft Security Essentials, MSE was presented as a basic security product. As it turns out, MSE offers users immensely more than what its price tag, or lack thereof, promises.

Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0

In terms of protection, AV-Test threw a range of threats against MSE 1.0, including viruses, worms, and Trojan horses. MSE 1.0 detected all the widespread malware out of 26,964 samples used, and an average of 95.6% of 1,359,862 malicious code samples considered a representative set of malware.

MSE 1.0 was also able to block 67% of zero-day (0-day) malware attacks from the Internet, including email threats, a little under the industry’s average of 75%.

At the same time, in terms of Dynamics Detection Testing, the solution’s ability to block malicious code on or post execution, MSE scored an average of 69%, more than the industry’s average of 63%.

Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 faired extremely well against widespread malware in tests involving the removal of all active components associated with infections. 95% of malicious code samples were cleaned by MSE 1.0, 5% more than the industry average.

Moreover, MSE 1.0 also scored better compared to the industry average in tests related to the removal of additional malicious components as well as the remediation of critical system modifications made by malware, with a 60% success rate.

MSE 1.0 also detected 100% of rootkits and stealth malware, although it was only capable of cleaning 71% of the hidden malicious code.

What is extremely interesting about Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 is that it has a perfect score of 0 when it comes down to false positives.

Because of all the technology built into modern antivirus products, there is always a risk that the security solutions can interpret actions of legitimate software, or legitimate software itself as malicious, when it’s not the case, resulting in a false positive.

MSE 1.0 produced no false detections of legitimate software and did not deliver any false warnings of tasks associated with the installation of legitimate software.

In addition, MSE 1.0 slowed down the computer it’s installed on with just 163 seconds in a number of 13 tests, with the industry average being 251 seconds.

Rival security products

While MSE 1.0 is available free of charge, users need to pay for any of the rest of the products evaluated by AV-Test.org. And yet, as users will be able to observe, Microsoft Security Essentials managed to outpace competitors in terms of scores.

Avast: Internet Security 5.0 scored a total of 12.5 in the latest AV-Test evaluation, with AVG: Internet Security 9.0 scoring 14.5; Avira: Premium Security Suite 10.0 13.5; BitDefender: Internet Security Suite 2010 14; Kaspersky: Internet Security 2010 16; Panda: Internet Security 2010 16 and Symantec: Norton Internet Security 2010 also with 16.

Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0 Beta

The Redmond company recently kicked off the public testing process for Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0, the successor of v1.0.

Early adopters need to take MSE 2.0 Beta out for a spin and test drive the evolution of the security solution (downloads live on Microsoft Connect).

MSE 2.0 integrates closely with Windows Firewall as well as with Internet Explorer, in order to protect against online threats.

In terms of new features, the product brings to the table a new antimalware engine as well as a network inspection system.

Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 is available for download here.

Avast Internet Security 5.0 is available for download
here.

AVG Internet Security 9.0 is available for download
here.

Avira Premium Security Suite 10.0 is available for download
here.

BitDefender Internet Security Suite 2011 is available for download
here.

Kaspersky Internet Security 2011 is available for download
here.

Panda Internet Security 2011 is available for download
here.

Symantec Norton Internet Security 2011 is available for download
here.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

49,619 hits · 14 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0 Beta Downloads Still Live, MSE 1.0 AV-Test.org Certified

Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 Earns High Scores from AV Testing Firm

Microsoft Security Essentials Antimalware Engine Update Postponed

Free Microsoft Security Essentials Receives VB100 Certification

Free Microsoft Security Tool Tackles Malware Targeting Windows .LNK 0-Day

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: MSE User on 21 Aug 2010, 13:38 UTC reply to this comment

Nice Article, It means I'm secure free of charge :)


Comment #2 by: PRADEEP on 21 Aug 2010, 15:46 UTC reply to this comment

MSE is much profitable product for those who can't purchase other security product......i still using it on my pc....

and must rate this free security product on the scale of 5.. its 4.5


Comment #3 by: Antivirus on 22 Aug 2010, 01:53 UTC reply to this comment

Microsoft Essentials is not a rival to any other Antivirus, but a complimentary because they work well with other Antivirus i.e. Kaspersky without problems

Comment #3.1 by: wiskas on 23 Aug 2010, 15:51 GMT

Sorry to say but your comment about running MSE with Kaspersky is not supported by Microsoft. It is also not supported by quite a number of professionals who deal with this day to day.


Comment #4 by: ebriatic on 22 Aug 2010, 20:21 UTC reply to this comment

I'm using this product, MSE almost from the launch date and I never had problems with it or with viruses and other stuff like that. Go Microsoft!

Comment #4.1 by: Jester1210 on 06 Jun 2011, 12:48 GMT

You are wrong. There is no reason to run multiple anti-virus together anyway there are no silver bullets. If you want to eat all your resources up and get a virus anyway be my guest but you are wasting time and resources. These programs are not designed to work together people no matter what this guy says pick one and stay off the fetish sites. I've been a tech for 20 years I'm speaking from personal experience. This is also a great way to get data collision in your memory leading to more errors.


Comment #5 by: chenban on 23 Aug 2010, 02:54 UTC reply to this comment

why isn't NOD32 listed there? it's very popular as far as I know (although this doesn't imply it's a good product)


Comment #6 by: VMN on 24 Aug 2010, 22:21 UTC reply to this comment

I just download MSE last 2 weeks ago and it's great and real easy use...yup! I just removed 2010 Norton 360, is not good for internet online while connecting, real slow! MSE is real time protection than other products!


Comment #7 by: miranda on 25 Aug 2010, 09:52 UTC reply to this comment

M$ should have had this a long time ago to protect its users against its half-baked insecure OS so they don't have to ALSO PAY for an AV.

I recommend to all the m$ sheeple to not buy any AV and install one of these free soln : avira, AVG or m$ Security.

Comment #7.1 by: jim h on 20 Jan 2011, 22:15 GMT

I take it you are one of the Apple Core who just can't stand anything good said about Windows or Microsoft. Having used every version of Windows since Windows 98 when it was new I have never had the problems the MS haters like to parrot ad nauseum. I got inconvenienced by a virus that was in the wild once. Once. I have 5 PCs on my home network at least half of which are on 24/7. I have also worked as an industrial electronics tech for over 39 years and 99% of the problems I have seen related to Windows have been created by users or software conflicts which are the software creator's fault, no Microsoft's. You can take the finest automobile in the world and it isn't going to make a superb professional driver out of a clueless non-driver. Yet nobody with any sense would blame the car for the shortcomings of the driver. The imperviousness of Apple software is frequently misrepresented because it's almost never discussed with the marketshare qualifier. And I think that the cult-like Apple Corers, not a one would go against the Apple Dogma. Apple is also a great deceiver, decades later still advertising how Windows/PC is only good for spread sheets. That lie alone makes me switch off anything else Apple has to say about anything, but lies are OK among the faithful I guess. Of course, only Microsoft gets the M$ as in making money is a crime. I'm sure Apple is purely benevolent and would never stoop so low as to try to make a profit. They sell everything at cost, right? Personally, I get so turned off by the hipper, cooler, and more tech savvy than thou attitude of the Apple Core I would do without a product if my only option was buy an "i" something. I'm even going to take the high road and not say what personal feminine product the name "iPad" brings to mind.

Comment #7.2 by: Mark L on 11 Feb 2012, 02:06 GMT

Jim H, you are wrong and the other guy is right. Just because he has a low opinion of Windows, it does not mean that he's a Mac fan. I share his opinion of Windows, and fall into the Mac hater category. Windows has been unstable but usable garbage until Xp came out. XP was a big step fowward but still not really a good OS. There are many problems that MS could fix with Windows that are easy and are not brain surgery. For starters the OS area on the disk should be off limits to everything but the OS. That would cure a whole lot of the problems. That just has to do with viruses. There are other issues with Windows machines. Try using one on a continuous basis without shutting it down, and see how it start to have problems and slow down. That is an OS problem. I have worked 20 years as a programmer and have worked at places that have had servers up for well over a year without any problems. These are servers that have a couple of hundred users on them. The only reason they were ever shut down was either to install software patches, or a hardware issue.


Comment #8 by: --- on 29 Aug 2010, 13:24 UTC reply to this comment

Mse might be good for low powered netbooks.
I'd check false positives by scanning "gray hat" software notorious for false/gray positives. e.g., pskill, password utilities. http://ubcd4win.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=13372

PS. "faired extremely well" should be, "fared extremely well". (I doubt that spell checkers know the difference.)


Comment #9 by: jim h on 20 Jan 2011, 21:49 UTC reply to this comment

Although it isn'r recommended to run two such products I did briefly run NIS 2010 alongside MSE. They behaved OK with each other but one day I got two alerts from NIS where hack attempts against my PC were blocked. One was from China and one from a former Soviet Bloc country. I don't know if MSE even saw them since no alerts were generated. It made me wonder how it would have acted if NIS wasn't there. Would it have allowed the hackers in? Would it have allowed them to do anything once in? That alone was enough to make me decide MSE didn't inspire confidence in me that it is the best choice for that kind of software. I went back to Symantec's products especially since my ISP, Comcast, now offers it as a free download to subscribers.


Comment #10 by: zack on 10 Sep 2011, 15:50 UTC reply to this comment

can i run together MSE with kaspersky internet security?

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM