Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Apple

October 14th, 2008, 13:38 GMT · By

Microsoft: Mac Buyers Pay Hidden Taxes

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Brad Brooks, corporate vice president, Windows Consumer Product Marketing
Enlarge picture
A CNET interview with Brad Brooks, corporate vice president, Windows Consumer Product Marketing, reveals that Apple's customers are still subject to a hidden "tax". Brooks explains that while Apple's #1 selling feature is the Mac's ability to run Windows in a virtual machine, users end up paying for two operating systems and a license to use Parallels, to get the end results.

Just to get a few things out of the way, the Mac's flagship feature is NOT its ability to run Windows in Boot Camp, or Parallels or whatever, while Apple's computing solutions deliver advantages that at some point just aren't comparable with Microsoft's. Having said all that, here's why Microsoft thinks Apple's customers are being tricked into paying more for what they'd be able to get by just going with the PC,

“If people want a Windows experience, then start with a machine that was built for the Windows experience,” said Brooks. “There's no question, if you look at it, and go to Apple's Web site today, their No. 1 selling feature that they're telling students as to why buy a Mac is because it does run Windows, and that you can get Office when you're running it in Boot Camp or Parallels. But, then you're just paying that tax again. You're paying for an upgrade to Windows, you're paying for the full version of Office, where you could get all of that at one price, at a price point that with a Blu-ray disk drive you can get with an $800 range from an HP or Sony”.

Leaving Blu-ray out, Parallels, unlike Boot Camp, provides Mac users with the ability to run both OSes (Mac OS X and Windows) simultaneously. The user can actually drag and drop files from a Mac app to a Windows app, and it just works. With hundreds of artists out there who need the Mac's usability and Windows' software compatibility, a machine able to run both Mac OS X and Windows makes sense, don't you agree?

The interviewers didn't back off one bit, having heard Brooks' assertions. In fact, they pressed Microsoft's guy to try and put his finger on exactly why people seem so willing to pay for this so called hidden Apple tax, despite this “bleak” reality. His response was, “You know, I think it's a good point. I think the question is, though, do customers really know what they're getting into? I don't personally believe that customers really know that a copy of Parallels is going to cost them $80, or that when they really look at what they're going to have to pay in terms of another $200 for a (full boxed copy of Windows), that they're going to pay for another $149 for MobileMe to put on there, Internet services, which they can basically get all the same functionality when they have Windows and Windows Live working together”.

Well, were you aware that Parallels' virtualization software costs money, or did you think Boot Camp was all you needed? A Windows user's comments on this would be greatly appreciated as well.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,402 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Analyst: Sub-$1,000 MacBook Would Be a Smart Choice

MacBook Pricing Leaked, New Cinema Displays from Apple

Leaked - Fully Assembled Next-Gen 15-Inch MacBook Pro

New MacBooks Launching Today

Playwatch Updated and on Sale

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: bytemangler on 14 Oct 2008, 20:08 UTC reply to this comment

yeah. Those stupid, stupid apple customers, with their stupid stupid minds.

As usual, M$ is grasping at straws here. Truth is, there is nothing about the Windows Experience anyone really WANTS to acquire. The only remaining compatibility issues are with some commercial games. NeoOffice on the Mac or OpenOffice.org on Ubuntu pretty much put the rest of the Microsoft dominance to rest. Microsoft as a software provider is obsolete. Regarding the cost of parrallels, you can get vmware for free, or,if you want a more integrated gui, you can get vmware fusion for half the cost of parrallels. In my opinion, vmware is far superior. As for the cost of a Windows installation, I am reminded of the classic discussion between a linux user and a windows user:

Linux User: "But I can get Linux for FREE!"
Windows User: "So? I can get Windows for free."


Comment #2 by: Jay on 14 Oct 2008, 23:46 UTC reply to this comment

Well people usually buy apple computers because of the smooth operation and quickness. if you put windows on a mac it will run much much better than on a pc. When you buy a pc you have to deal with viruses,spywear, and other bugs designed to make microsoft more money. When you buy a mac(i personally own a black macbook) you do not have to deal with the hastle the pc gives you. if you want your computer to run slow ,freeze, take about 5 minutes to start and shutdown, and destroy your patients, buy a pc. if you want a quick,hastle free computer that virtually delivers amazing performance every time,starts up and shuts down in about 10-30 seconds buy a mac. I can see why many consumers buy apple. I do not see it as a tax compared to how microsoft purposely puts spyware,viruses, and bugs so that you will have buy new software in-order to keep your computer clean,but at the same time your pc will still run slow and will be very annoying( trust me i have 3 different pc`s in my home). Over all you will end up paying more money for a pc in the long run. The apple computers might be a little more pricey than an average pc but the quality is beyond any comparison. Thats why consumers dont mind paying the so called tax.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM