Search Perform an advanced search query SOFTPEDIA
 
SOFTPEDIA
Updated one minute ago
HomeSubmit a program for being reviewedAdvertise on our websiteGet help on surfing our websitesSend us your feedbackGet information about our XML/RSS backend and how to use itBrowse the news archiveVisit our discussion forumVizitati forumul in limba romana



KLIP
  1. HOME
  2. SCIENCE
  3. TECHNOLOGY
  4. WEBMASTER
  5. SECURITY
  6. MICROSOFT
  7. LINUX
  8. APPLE
  9. GAMES
  10. TELECOMS
  11. REVIEWS
  12. LIFE & STYLE
  13. EDITORIALS
  14. INTERVIEWS
  15. RSS
Welcome!
Hello, Guest

Login if you have a Softpedia.com account.

Otherwise, register for one.

APPLE

Microsoft Lawyer Out to Get Apple

- When will we see the case against Apple because they didn't warn against swallowing your iPod?

By: Victor Mihailescu, Apple News Editor

The story of the latest iPod trial has spread like wildfire and many news sources have shown images with the iPod and the word defective stamped in big letters on top of it.

One of the most interesting developments is the realization that the lawyer who is representing John Kiel Patterson also happens to be the lawyer in the case against Apple over the iPod that ‘scratches
too easily’; furthermore, Steve W. Berman is on retainer at Microsoft.

"More recently, Microsoft recognized Mr. Berman's experience and expertise when the company retained him to be part of the core national team representing the company in antitrust class actions arising from Judge Jackson's Findings of Fact in the Department of Justice antitrust case against the company."

Quite a coincidence. First it was that the iPod ‘scratches too easily’ or ‘is prone to scratching.’ And just as the line between any smooth glass finish can be scratched if not handled properly, and ‘scratches too easily’ is very fine indeed, this latest lawsuit seems to hold just as much water.

The latest lawsuit claims that the iPod has the potential to cause irreparable hearing loss.
"He's bought a product which is not safe to use as currently sold on the market,'' Berman said. "He's paying for a product that's defective, and the law is pretty clear that if someone sold you a defective product they have a duty to repair it.''

The iPod is not defective. On page 13 of the iPod User Guide , Apple clearly warns the user of the potential danger that lies in not using the device properly:

"Permanent hearing loss may occur if earphones or headphones are used at high volume. You can adapt over time to a higher volume of sound, which may sound normal but can be damaging to your hearing. Set your iPod’s volume to a safe level before that happens. If you experience ringing in your ears, reduce the volume or discontinue use of your iPod."

The safety instructions were there to be read and followed, and lack of adherence to them is the responsibility of the individual, or so one would think. It seems Mr. Berman has learned differently from his interaction with Microsoft.

MORE RELATED ARTICLES: Apple Sued Because iPod Might Cause Loss of Hearing Microsoft iPod Killer in the Works? New Swiss iPod Tax
 
Comments | Link here | Subscribe
Print | Send to friend
Today's News | Yesterday's News

Search:

3rd February 2006, 05:18 GMT | Copyright (c) 2006 Softpedia | Contact:
Read by 2,896 user(s) | Rating: | 8 vote(s) so far | Cast your vote:
Microsoft Lawyer Out to Get Apple - USER OPINIONS

Comment #1 by ARTIOM on 2006-02-03, 07:29 GMT reply to this comment 
what a tosser!!

Comment #2 by geekboy2000 on 2006-02-04, 21:49 GMT reply to this comment 
I tend to agree that this is pretty silly, however, just for the sake of argument:

I don't believe a warning or disclaimer alone absolves the person/party of responsibility. If the device is *capable* of playing at volume levels that can and will damage a persons hearing, and *knowing* that it is used with in-ear transducers, one could argue that Apple should know better.
Also, I believe that at least some iPod models manufactured for markets outside the US have volume limiting (emphasis on "believe"). If in fact that's true, one could argue that if it seemed to make good sense to comply with regulations that might protect a person's hearing *outside* the US, then why not do the same for products manufactured for the US market?
Personally, I truly believe the responsibility for protecting one's hearing lies with the user, but from a legal perspective, this may not be as easily dismissed as this article would have us believe.


go to top


SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT Microsoft Lawyer Out to Get Apple

Since you are not logged on, your comments will have to be approved before being displayed.
Click here to login, or register.
Your Name:
Your Email:
Type in the result:
Your Opinion:
 


DO YOU WANT TO CONTACT US?  

If you have some comments or you want to send us some information you can send us an email directly to .
You can use the form below for the same purpose.
Your full name: (at least 3 characters)
Your email address: (at least 5 characters)
Message subject: (at least 5 characters)
Message text:
(at least 10 characters)
Type in the result:
 
 



© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved.
Softpedia™ and Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.
Copyright Information | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Softpedia | Update your software | Archive