Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Webmaster > Internet Life

October 10th, 2012, 11:21 GMT · By

Microsoft Derails Do Not Track Process, Advertisers Will Ignore IE10 Settings

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

IE10's implementation of Do Not Track will be ignored by advertisers
Enlarge picture
The Do Not Track header seemed like a good idea when it was first proposed by Mozilla. It's still a good idea, the problem is taking this idea and implementing it. While most browsers support the feature, that doesn't mean anything if advertisers don't do the same.

So far, the two sides seemed to get along, but Microsoft, willingly or not, has managed to derail the process with its decision to enable Do Not Track by default in IE10, whether people want it or not.

This decision has been criticized by everyone involved in the process, but Microsoft has been unrelenting.

So the Digital Advertising Alliance, the industry body which governs the self-regulation of the online ad business, said it would not require its members to respect DNT, if it set by the browser makers and not the users.

"The DAA does not require companies to honor DNT signals fixed by the browser manufacturers and set by them in browsers," it said in a statement.

"Specifically, it is not a DAA Principle or in any way a requirement under the DAA Program to honor a DNT signal that is automatically set in IE10 or any other browser," it added.

"The trade associations that lead the DAA do not believe that Microsoft’s IE10 browser settings are an appropriate standard for providing consumer choice. Machine-driven do not track does not represent user choice; it represents browser-manufacturer choice," it went on to explain.

Microsoft, in its wisdom, has decided to not follow the standard specifications and make DNT the default, despite criticism from both other browser makers and advertising companies.

It's an easy point to score with users, especially if they don't realize that Microsoft isn't really protecting their privacy if advertisers ignore the setting.

Coincidentally, Microsoft is said to be looking to get out of the ad network business altogether. Also coincidentally Google, its biggest competitor as far as Microsoft is concerned, makes most of its money from ads.

Microsoft fan Ed Bott, in one of his usual tirades, is now attacking the proposed standard itself arguing that the discussion has gone into "crazy territory." Funnily enough, he makes no mention whatsoever of Microsoft's involvement in the whole deal or the decision by the DAA to not respect IE10's settings.


1,287 hits · 3 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Norway's Pirates Can Roam the BitTorrent Seas Freely and Quasi-Legally

Thunderbird 15 Debuts with Australis UI, Integrated Chat with Facebook, Twitter, XMPP

BitTorrent Is Widely Monitored, Top Torrents Are Scanned Every Few Hours

“Do Not Track” Is Worthless Until Advertisers Respect It, Google and Microsoft Don’t

Mozilla Congratulates Google Chrome over Implementing Do Not Track

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: blipblap on 10 Oct 2012, 13:17 UTC reply to this comment

Did you read Ed Bott's story? No link was provided to it in this post, but your characterization of it is way off.


Comment #2 by: ramerson1 on 10 Oct 2012, 18:22 UTC reply to this comment

Isn't the ads what makes the internet free? If no ads,does this mean charging by the minute for internet access?


Comment #3 by: Eric on 10 Oct 2012, 20:19 UTC reply to this comment

MS isn't * , they probably knew this would happen. You have to admit, it is a rather brilliant way to keep the status-quot on advertising while also making MS *look* like they are privacy-conscious to end-users.

Of course it isn't like advertisers *want* to honor this do not track setting...in a way I agree that it should be turned on by default, else only the computer savvy people will take advantage of it, and computer savvy people aren't as vulnerable to tricky advertisements.

It does seem that a do not track setting that requires the consent or blessing of advertisers is somewhat doomed to be a compromise between what is best for users, and what is best for profit.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM