Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Entertainment

November 30th, 2005, 13:17 GMT · By Simona Gherman

Michael Jackson Not The Real Father Of His Children

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Michael Jackson's ex wife, Debbie Rowe, has made a shocking statement, revealing that Prince Michael Jr. I and Paris are not the star's biological children. They had been conceived, if Mrs. Rowe is telling the truth, with anonymous sperm from a semen bank donor, whose name, of course, was not mentioned.

And, even more shocking, the pop star was all this time aware of that:
"Michael knows the truth - that he is not the natural father of Prince Michael Jr and Paris. He has to come clean. I have no information whatsoever about the identity of the semen donor for either child as such (semen) was obtained anonymously from a semen bank under an agreement of confidentiality," Rowe told Irish newspaper The Sunday World.

Deborah Jeanne Rowe was Michael Jackson's dermatologist nurse. They got married in 1996 and divorced later in 1999. Rowe declared that she wanted Jackson to have the children as a "gift", so she gave up her parental rights, but from 2005, a family court case is under way regarding visitation rights.

Another eccentricity of the pop star is him not allowing his ex-wife to tell their two children she is their mum.
The woman has the right to visit Prince Michael (8) and Paris (7), but she can't reveal her true identity.
"That topic is off-limits. But it will be revisited when they are older," a source told America's New York Daily News.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

26,155 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Michael Jackson Doesn't Allow His Ex-Wife Debbie Rowe to Tell Their Two Children She Is Their Mum

Michael Jackson Might Record Tracks with Kids

Michael Jackson to Apologize for Alleged Remarks on Jews

Michael Jackson Caught Applying Make-Up in the Ladies Room

Michael Jackson's Racist Views

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: totellthetruth on 09 Oct 2011, 05:30 UTC reply to this comment

It is obvious.The three so called jackson children are not his biological children. That is simply not the way genitics function. Many people want to believe that they are is children.(Lord knows why),but that does not make it so. I am a biological scientist and have studied genetics(unlike most people that have commented on this matter), and all three children have no inherited connect to the jackson family. While the youngest child has dark eyes, that does not make him of black african descent.He clearly has a differnt lineage than that of micheal jackson.Children of mixed racial background can potentionaly show a large range of phenotypic skin complexion.But a child cannot diregard all genetic traits of one parent. Many say that it doesnt matter,but ofcourse it matters,if he is not the father (which he is not) then he has not only lied to three human beings,whom he claims to love, but has kept them from their medical histories and their geneology and that is truly unjustified. Does claim of love and financial support make up for misdirecting innocent people from information that may be of immeasurable value to them?

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM