NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Security

Security


Malwarebytes: IObit Stole Our Signatures Database

IObit dismisses the accusations

By Lucian Constantin, Web News Editor

3rd of November 2009, 08:56 GMT

Adjust text size:


Malwarebytes accuses IObit of intellectual property theft
Enlarge picture
Malwarebytes accuses Chinese antivirus vendor IObit of stealing its intellectual property and threatens to pursue legal action. Despite the solid evidence presented by Malwarebytes, IObit denies any wrongdoing and plans to respond through its lawyers.

Malwarebytes Corporation is a US-based company developing several security-oriented applications. Its flagship and most popular product is called Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware (MBAM), which comes in both free and commercial flavors and is particularly renowned for its ability to remove rogueware.

In a post published on its official blog yesterday, Malwarebytes takes aim at IObit for allegedly stealing its signatures. "Malwarebytes has recently uncovered evidence that a company called IOBit based in China is stealing and incorporating our proprietary database and intellectual property into their software," the company announces.

It all started with a report that the IObit Security 360 application detects a Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware key generator as Don’t.Steal.Our.Software.A, a name specifically created and used by Malwarebytes. "Why would IOBit detect a keygen for our software and refer to it using our database name?" the company asked.

In order to put their suspicions to the test, Malwarebytes researchers crafted a dummy malware sample and an accompanying signature, which they called Rogue.AVCleanSweepPro. Under normal circumstances, this sample shouldn't have been blocked by any other product rather than MBAM, but after about two weeks, IObit started detecting the fake file under exactly the same name.

In addition, Malwarebytes also created a benign file and modified it to particularly match their definition for a real piece of malware called Adware.NaviPromo. No antivirus product out of the 41 ones listed on VirusTotal detect this dummy file, but IObit Security 360 does, again using the same name.

The accusations don't stop here and Malwarebytes even goes as far as to say that "During the course of our investigation, we uncovered additional evidence that IObit may have stolen the proprietary databases of other security vendors as well." The company demands that IObit removes the allegedly stolen signatures from its database and for its software to be unlisted from software download sites for terms of service violations.

IObit dismisses Malwarebytes' allegations and describes them as "malicious rumors for hyping itself." The vendor explains that its malware samples came from many sources, including independent ones and that under these circumstances, it’s hard to avoid errors such as name duplication.

"For the sake of avoiding dispute and possible problems, we have deleted all disputed items in our database temporarily, and have updated IObit Security 360’s database," it says. The company also notes that it is currently investigating the signatures declared stolen by Malwarebytes and plans to release a legal statement later today in order to prove that no intellectual property theft has been committed.

Note: Softpedia did not receive any official request from Malwarebytes to remove IObit's software from its website. We plan to contact both companies for additional clarification and we will update this article as more information becomes available.

Update: Softpedia has decided to temporarily remove the download links to IObit Security 360 from its website until this whole situation is resolved.

IObit has updated its original public statement with a "technical analysis report," which Malwarebytes has again rebutted. You are invited to read our exclusive interview with Malwarebytes' CEO Marcin Kleczynski for additional information.

Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware detection of the dummy samples
Enlarge picture
IObit Security 360 detection of dummy sample #1
Enlarge picture
IObit Security 360 detection of dummy sample #2
Enlarge picture
IObit Security 360 detection of dummy sample #3
Enlarge picture

TAGS:

Malwarebytes | IObit | copyright infringement | intellectual property | definitions theft
Read by 2,838 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Excellent (4.7/5) 14 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Company Plans to Release Low-Cost Green Dam Alternative

PC OEMs Risk Copyright Lawsuits over China's Censorware

The Free Software Foundation Sues Cisco

HijackThis Hijacked by Trojan Remover

Scareware Fights Back at Legit Security Software

Malware Cleaner Affiliates No Better than Scareware Pushers

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: coffeeman on 03 Nov 2009, 15:38 GMT reply to this comment

Well chinese are well known for copying any other products; let`s not forget NOKLA or that bentley copy. This is just a fact, in the sevurity software market that came up. I wonder what other technology or products are made under a different name, on the chinese market?!
Just my two cents!


Comment #2 by: jeff on 04 Nov 2009, 04:59 GMT reply to this comment

Another false detection here "Hijack.DisplayProperties"

http://freeantivirushelp.com/blog/post/2009/10/24/IObit-Security-360-Review-and-Download.aspx


Comment #3 by: jpava on 04 Nov 2009, 05:18 GMT reply to this comment

I am a long time user of IOBIT, it's a respective company which really listen to his custom, this make iobit develop so fast moved the status of MBAM, so I can understand why MBAM planned attack

Comment #3.1 by: LaserWraith on 05 Nov 2009, 14:25 GMT

Maybe MBAM doesn't like IObit.

But you seem to be ignoring what they have to say because you think that MBAM just did it because they dislike IObit.


Comment #4 by: David. Edward on 04 Nov 2009, 08:14 GMT reply to this comment

It’s hardly to believe the situation is true. I use both Malwarebyte and IObit Security 360 now, most of time, I found IObit Security 360 can scan more malwares, adwares, Trojan, etc than Malwarebyte, so I still doubt that how IObit steal Malwarebytes’ data? Malwarebyte has no protection for its critical data?

Everything is possible, why cannot Malwarebytes frame IObit to kill the big competitor?

Comment #4.1 by: LaserWraith on 05 Nov 2009, 14:23 GMT

@David. Edward: IObit has been accused of stealing from other companies too. They also make their own sigs. That could be a reason why they find more malware.


Comment #5 by: Gimy on 04 Nov 2009, 12:36 GMT reply to this comment

IoBit steal many things from other, not only database, all of their products are from open source code project. I can say as I am a chinese. I know their employee well.

Comment #5.1 by: jpava on 05 Nov 2009, 06:06 GMT

I know you guy, you are jimmy work for mbam, don't make your work so obviously


Comment #6 by: Al Bundy on 05 Nov 2009, 21:11 GMT reply to this comment

Iobit didn't just ripoff Malwarebytes, they falsely claimed that Iobit Security 360 was featured in Bizjournals, AOL, Reuters, HooVers, and Forbes. When you do a search on any of those websites, nothing concerning Iobit Security 360 can be found. Also, if you look on Iobit.com, there is no information provided as to the location of the company. Why would they not want people to know where they are located? Check the grammar and spelling on the website. If they were a professional company, they would have someone who could speak and read English well and able to proof read the website. Sometime on Nov. 3, Iobit removed the icons for Bizjournals, AOL, Reuters, Hoovers, and Forbes. I think it is easy to come to the conclusion, that Iobit cannot be trusted.


Comment #7 by: Jedi on 06 Nov 2009, 16:07 GMT reply to this comment

jpjava and David. Edward sound remarkably like contributors to Iobit's own forum, right down to virtually identical posts. Hmm.
Iobit is not a competitor to MBAM. They are not even in the same league. MalwareBytes are an established US company, you can go to their forums and speak directly to the CEO and Developers. Iobit, as Al Bundy points out, is a typical dodgy anonymous overseas outfit.
MalwareBytes evidence against Iobit is completely convincing, there rebuttal is pathetic. MalwareBytes developers created a trap and they fell right in it, end of story. The only way that dummy file could have got into Iobit's database was by theft, it was never obtainable in any other way.
Well done Softpedia for pulling their product.


Comment #8 by: Jack on 08 Nov 2009, 04:55 GMT reply to this comment

Are there any evidences show that IOBit is a China company?


Comment #9 by: eden on 09 Nov 2009, 19:39 GMT reply to this comment

honestly, i tested iobit security and malwarebytes before to solve trojan and malware from my computer. i used malwarebytes first. it can detect several trojan and malware, but malwarebytes cannot remove it from my computer and it crashed. useless. after that, i downloaded iobit 360 and it works well. it can detect many trojans and malware, and easily removed it. 40% for malwarebytes and 99% for iobit 360. i think maybe malwarebytes wants to dominate the market and have planning a solid strategy to eliminate its competitors.


Comment #10 by: bobad on 20 Nov 2009, 13:41 GMT reply to this comment

IOBit now has new releases that claim to have a "Whole new detection database".

That's pretty close to an admission they filched MBAM's database.

The question now is whether IOBit's new database is effective.

Thanks to SoftPedia for keeping us abreast of potential problems!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM