Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Behavior/Humans

April 25th, 2007, 13:38 GMT · By Stefan Anitei

Lethal Injection Means a Slow and Painful Death

SHARE:

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
When lethal injection was proposed and accepted in 1977 by Oklahoma state medical examiner Jay Chapman as a human method of killing inmates, the word seemed to go out of the side of barbaric executions by hanging or electric chair. The shot is based on an anesthetic, ultrashort-acting sedative and a paralytic compound.

This cocktail should stop the heart and induce a rapid and painless death, being at the time redundant: if one chemical does not kill the inmate, one of the other two will do it.
But a new research reveals that incorrect dosage is not only painless for the executed, but it can also induce a slow death due to the asphyxiation determined by total paralysis.

The team included the molecular biologist Teresa Zimmers of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine,
a surgeon, an anesthesiologist and a lawyer and registered the data offered by the only two states that show records of the executions: North Carolina and California (the latter being forced by court order to do so), meaning 41 out of 891 lethal injections made in US to date.

These states employ various dosages of sodium thiopental (an anesthestetic), pancuronium bromide (a general paralyzer) and potassium chloride (this salt stops the heartbeat). They are injected in doses designed to kill condemned inmates. The dosages differ from state to state, but not from mate to mate, neglecting their body measurements (weight and height). That's why in North Carolina the executed died on average in nine minutes and in California two to eight minutes following the injection of potassium chloride.

"When potassium chloride was added, it didn't seem to change the time of death," Zimmers notes.

The levels of thiopental could have been not enough to make the procedure painless as revealed by vets, who developed accurate dosage guidelines for killing painless animals.
Sometimes, in human executions less thiopental dosage is used than for killing just 50 % of mice. Monkeys could recover in many cases from such doses.

"The way that thiopental is administered, it would be an unacceptably low dose if the inmate was a pig scheduled for euthanasia," said Zimmers.

"We are doing it successfully in animals and we're doing it successfully because they've taken a hard look at it. When you do it with animals, there is no pain. It's likely there is with people." signaled co-author Jon Sheldon, criminal defense attorney in Virginia.

Finally, the slow death is induced by the bromide, which kills by asphyxiation, as breathe muscles are paralyzed.

"In such case death by suffocation would occur in a paralyzed inmate fully aware of the progressive suffocation and potassium-induced sensation of burning," the researchers write.

"This idea that this is a painless procedure is completely wrong. It's just invisible because the person is paralyzed." said Zimmers.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

8,085 hits · 13 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:

0

Solving the Myth of the Vampires

The Second Born Twin Is More Likely to Die

A Mathematical Model for the Death Roll

Wine Consumption Prolongs Life

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: EX Navy on 04 Jan 2010, 06:51 UTC reply to this comment

Let’s examine this just a bit. The person that has been administrated this lethal injection is a convicted murderer. To the best of my understanding a murderer is someone that has caused the death of another person. This may have occurred during a robbery, burglary or for no apparent reason at all. The victim was either shot, stabbed, beaten with some blunt object or even the murderer’s fists or strangled. The victim was left to bleed to death; possibly in the presence of loved ones including young children. The victim is dead, the family traumatized, children are left without a father or mother, the only source of income may have been removed and I am supposed to be concerned that this murderer might be in pain when they are executed. I feel no sympathy for these people that are on death row waiting for the day that it is their turn to receive their Lethal Injection. It has been said that the death penalty does not deter other criminals from committing murder, but what it does deter is that murderer from committing another murder. It is bleeding hearts like Jon Sheldon that are so concerned about causing no pain to someone that has destroyed a life and perhaps an entire family, that removes the fear of death in criminals. Would it be more humane to place this murderer in front of a firing squad, or perhaps have their neck snapped when the trap door of the gallows is sprung? Perhaps if we didn’t coddle these criminals and treat them as if they were the victims there would be fewer of them. I had a loved one murdered, left to die in an alley all for the two five dollar bills in his pocket.

Comment #1.1 by: 23 on 20 Oct 2010, 02:00 GMT

i agree with everything you said.


Comment #2 by: liveitwise! on 29 Aug 2010, 02:17 UTC reply to this comment

i really think execution is so hypocritical! the criminal is a human being, that obviously made a major mistake, for what reasons i don't know but everyone has done something wrong. the law locks people up for killing of others but yet turn around and just "perform it in a fancier way". killing is killing no matter what! we must bring an end to lethal injection

Comment #2.1 by: lm123trackmid on 18 Dec 2010, 18:17 GMT

Yes,
you should be concerened that the murderer is in pain when executed. This is what differentiates us from them. When we want to see justice served by torture, we then become like them. Death in itself should be sufficient... There is a time to heal, not a time for torture I am saddened to hear of your loss but God says " Vengence Is Mine " and he will be held accountable, and that is one he cannot bear under! Be at peace with that...

Comment #2.2 by: HOLLYONE on 22 Sep 2011, 21:22 GMT

IF YOU DON'T FORGIVE GOD WILL NOT FORGIVE YOU

Comment #2.3 by: Polos51 on 21 Dec 2011, 05:24 GMT

Well, if science wants to extend life to 150 years old, you want to support these vermin with your tax dollars. Are you sending part of your paycheck--besides your taxes-- to the prison system to help pay for these murderers to fatten up, lift weights and get released where many kill again. Are you better then the God of the old testament who ordered death to people who violated the commandment, "Thou shalt not murder?" Did Jesus rebuke the thief on the cross who said, "We are receiving the just punishment for our deeds," but rather Jesus told him, "You will be with me in paradise."


Comment #3 by: sorted_simon on 23 Sep 2010, 19:30 UTC reply to this comment

Countries with the death penalty DO NOT have lower murder rates, therefore the death penalty is not effective.

What you seem to be saying EX Navy is that the death penalty is a tit-for-tat, revenge type killing. What's the point? Surely we should be looking for a way to reduce murder - the death penalty does not do this..

Comment #3.1 by: Polos51 on 21 Dec 2011, 05:27 GMT

By this logic, lets release everybody from prison, close all the prisons and forgive everybody. This is not forgiveness, but rather shirking from your responsibilities as a civilized society.


Comment #4 by: lm123trackmind on 18 Dec 2010, 17:48 UTC reply to this comment

This is considered torture of another human being, which is not acceptable by any means... If the death penalty is not abolished, why not use the drug used before a surgery, we know this is painless...


Comment #5 by: meme on 22 Sep 2011, 04:45 UTC reply to this comment

lethal injection is cruel to humans....


Comment #6 by: Wreath on 22 Sep 2011, 18:33 UTC reply to this comment

I think this is horrible. I do no like killing a human being. But people that loss their love ones only they know how to feel about it. Reading that Legal injection is painful is wrong. I do not understand why this goes on and does it make the people that give it to them any better?


Comment #7 by: hateit on 25 Oct 2011, 09:08 UTC reply to this comment

it's sick.....


Comment #8 by: Polos51 on 21 Dec 2011, 05:17 UTC reply to this comment

Why should we worry about causing pain to condemned murderers when everyone on earth has to go through pain at one time or another. Is it because they had the nerve to stab, rape, torture, dismember or shoot somebody else that they managed to get within their complete power, which is usually a child or a woman, that they have earned our most deepest sympathy that they feel no pain in life or in death when all of us are destined to feel pain at death. Why the exaggerated concern over murderers and sociopaths who have no feelings for causing pain to the weakest of humans and enjoy in giving pain and spilling blood as sport? This fascination is morbid because God has not excused anyone, not even the innocents, from feeling pain in this life experience on earth.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM