Kourtney Kardashian’s Lover Claims Mason Is Not Scott Disick’s Son

Model Michael Girgenti claims he slept with Kourtney 9 months before Mason was born

By on March 27th, 2013 15:42 GMT

Kourtney Kardashian has stuck by boyfriend and baby daddy Scott Disick through thick and thin but that doesn’t mean that she was always faithful to him. Or, at least, that’s what LA-based model Michael Girgenti claims in a new interview.

If his name doesn’t ring a bell, it’s ok. He and Kourtney took part in a photo shoot in 2008, and he’s now telling InTouch Weekly that they also slept together.

As it happens, this reported romantic encounter happened while she and Scott were on a break and, even weirder, 9 months or so before Mason was born.

“We started kissing, making out and touching each other. We were fooling around on the couch for a little while before I took her to the bedroom,” the model shares for the publication.

He insists they definitely slept together and even embarked on a short-lived relationship afterwards.

“Michael claims the two communicated by BlackBerry Messenger, but says that after they were intimate during their third hangout at his Glendale, Calif., apartment, Kourtney went silent despite his attempts to reach her,” InTouch writes.

However, the thought that Mason, the boy Kourtney claimed was Scott’s, looked so much like him never left him. Now, so many years later, he wants the reality star to undergo a DNA test to establish who the real father is.

“I would definitely want to acknowledge Mason if he’s my kid. He deserves to know his real father,” Michael says.

In a statement to the same media outlet, an attorney for Kourtney stresses that she only knew Michael in a professional capacity: they did the shoot together and that was it.

They did not exchange phone numbers, they did not come in contact after the shoot, they did not socialize and they certainly did not sleep together. As such, there is no chance of him being Mason’s father, the lawyer adds, calling claims to the contrary “a preposterous and an outrageous lie.”

Comments