Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Life and Style > Accessories

November 7th, 2011, 18:51 GMT · By

Kim Kardashian Will Pay Kris Humphries for the Engagement Ring

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Kim Kardashian will pay soon to be ex-husband to keep the 20.5-carat engagement ring
Enlarge picture
Ever the shrewd businesswoman, Kim Kardashian considered the possibility of divorce even before she started making wedding plans with Kris Humphries. This way, she will get to keep the engagement ring she got from him.

Kim and Kris were married in August in a lavish private ceremony that reportedly made them laugh all the way to the bank.

Now, 72 days later, they are getting a divorce and many are wondering (among other things) what Kim will do with the 20.5-carat, $2 million (€1.45 million) ring she got from Kris when he proposed.

Word online has it that Kim is entitled to keep the bauble, since she married Kris. Had she called off the engagement before saying “I Do,” she would have had to return it.

Her mom, Kris Jenner, says she should – and will – keep it because “it's a gift” and you shouldn't ask to have gifts returned.

As it turns out, Kim planned ahead and actually included a clause in the prenup she and Kris signed referring strictly to the ring, TMZ reports.

“Sources close to the former couple tell us... it was Kris who originally bought the 20.5 carat diamond stunner and Kim loved the ring so much, she included a clause in the pre-nup which allows her buy the ring from Kris for the original purchase price in the case of a divorce,” the e-zine has learned.

“Ironically, without a special clause in the prenup, Kim would have been the proud owner outright, because once they became man and wife, the ring would have been Kim's,” TMZ further says.

Either way, Kim is believed to be willing to pay Kris for the ring, even if it's rightfully hers either way. In doing so, she complies with the terms stipulated in the prenup.

Kim and Kris never said how much the ring was worth, but word got out in various magazines that its price tag was of 2 million (€1.45 million).

Kris Jenner insists the ring is actually worth half that amount – but, then again, she's also saying neither her daughter nor the family profited in any way from the wedding. In fact, they lost money by organizing it, she says.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

6,128 hits · 21 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Kim Kardashian Gets to Keep Massive $2 Million (€1.45 Million) Engagement Ring

Nichole de Carle Launches Panties with Real Diamond, £232 ($366 or €266)

World’s Most Expensive Dessert: £22,000 ($34,500 or €25,000)

Kim Kardashian Doesn’t Wear Engagement Ring All the Time

Anti-Aging Face Cream with Diamond Particles Sells Out

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: bab on 08 Nov 2011, 01:45 UTC reply to this comment

i think she is a gold digger.if she didnt want to be married to him he should get the ring back. the whole family are all a bunch of voltures her mother is a joke . what a bunch of pigs. pay up kim and do the right thing.you are a hippocret.she doesnt deserve him or the diamond. he is a much better person. anything for attention the kardashian. boycott all of them.a disgrace...........


Comment #2 by: Rn on 08 Nov 2011, 06:31 UTC reply to this comment

Is it Kris asking Kim to pay back the engagment ring?If he is it is weird.If he isn't then he is right coz no body asks a partner to return an engagment ring which she had accepted and besides it is her gift.She keeps the engagment ring if she wants to and no pay back.Case closed.

Comment #2.1 by: Confused on 08 Nov 2011, 14:28 GMT

Obviously you have a hard time with grammar and punctuation because your comment is badly written in so many ways. Please correct this before you submit anything else on any other website.


Comment #3 by: mama nancy on 08 Nov 2011, 09:11 UTC reply to this comment

i think kris shoulve have kim keep the ring he got her even though he boughted it for her, thats not right that he wanted back so fast ! is it because he needed MONEY !?

Comment #3.1 by: Confused on 08 Nov 2011, 14:26 GMT

Do you know how to spell? Proofread things before you submit them online.


Comment #4 by: glee on 08 Nov 2011, 14:05 UTC reply to this comment

I think they should be taken off the tv.Here are people that dont even have homes their children uprooted from their homes and have nothing to eat or a place to sleep.Or even people who cant find jobs or are losing job.And she is worried over a simple ring.Sell it and give the money to the Salvation Army to care for the less forunate that will nerver see or have anything like the Ring.It makes me sick to see people on tv to make a profit like these K family cant they get real jobs.Their day is coming if this world does not change .No body will be able to afford tv.and movie ticket then where will they be in the soup line.


Comment #5 by: chloe on 08 Nov 2011, 14:55 UTC reply to this comment

We watch their show an that guy was a * from the start. He said, whatever the heck he felt like. He insulted every person in kims family. Keep the ring. Its a gift and payment for all the grieve he caused!

Comment #5.1 by: maw on 08 Nov 2011, 16:51 GMT

Looks like we have an English teacher proofreading the comments.


Comment #6 by: l5459 on 08 Nov 2011, 18:12 UTC reply to this comment

This was all a part of her plan to get the media to talk all about her again. What a gold digger, this marriage was fake from the beginning. This was almost as low as her sex tape "leaking" and them getting money off of it.


Comment #7 by: brenda on 08 Nov 2011, 18:44 UTC reply to this comment

I think kim should keep the ring and go on with her life. Kris dosent deserve a super star. His jurk.


Comment #8 by: star on 08 Nov 2011, 19:16 UTC reply to this comment

How is it shrewd to have agreed to pay for the ring that would have been hers to keep withno payment had she not included the clause...? doesn't sound too shrewd to me...maybe she thought it was fair? there is no possiblity that she did not ask a lawyer what the law was with regard to that.


Comment #9 by: remarkable woman on 08 Nov 2011, 21:23 UTC reply to this comment

Why would a woman who is divorcing a man even WANT his ring? Kim K. has enough
money to buy herself a comparable ring with no emotional attachments to it.

These two never should have been married. Kris H. is 27 going on 3. He is a whiny,
immature, selfish person who not once came across as mature enough to be a husband,
especially the husband of someone in the public eye. Kim is smart to get out NOW.


Comment #10 by: remarkable woman on 08 Nov 2011, 21:26 UTC reply to this comment

Confused is totally right. Some of the people who have written these
comments can't spell, can't use grammar correctly, and sound like complete
morons. Didn't ANY of you go to school?


Comment #11 by: lucky44 on 09 Nov 2011, 00:38 UTC reply to this comment

These women are all greedy. The poor guy who married her probably would have lived a life time of misery and greed with this classless family .she definitly used him.


Comment #12 by: Nurse Nikkie on 09 Nov 2011, 02:29 UTC reply to this comment

I thought that a ring was a symbol of love and dedication for your marriage, for better or worse, richer or poorer, good times and bad..... the ring is supposed to be a reminder of all of those VOWS. If kim had put real effort into the marriage i would say keep it, but the fact that she only gave it 72 days does not show much effort at all, she should give it back. She stood before all those people and god, and lied through her teeth, shame on you kim!!! Karma is a * .


Comment #13 by: joja on 11 Nov 2011, 22:18 UTC reply to this comment

from the beginning you can see that kim is too martialistik you can see that kris humpries love her too much,but it didnt come the same from kim,s site. you have to summit under your husband.


Comment #14 by: mimmi on 12 Nov 2011, 07:56 UTC reply to this comment

i think the whole family is a joke & should be ashamed of the entire event. espeically since chris(mom) is suppose to be a "minister". maybe she should have concentated on teaching her girls the meaning of marriage instead of the value of a buck. even if they are laughting their way to the bank they have lost their souls & instead of american royalty they r a laughing stock. i hope their dignity was worth it. i hope to never see any of them again & will not purchase anything they r affiliated with. i have no intention of lineing their pockets & i use to admire thier business sense. needless to say that is down the drain along w/ my respect for any of them. snl hit it in the head they're just a joke/


Comment #15 by: abms on 14 Nov 2011, 01:35 UTC reply to this comment

The ring was received under false pretenses. Who falls out out of love in 72 days. Do the right thing and return the 2Million $ ring. Columbia SC


Comment #16 by: miki on 14 Nov 2011, 16:24 UTC reply to this comment

The ring represents a contract, the contract is void upon divorce. So to keep just prove she is the gold digger we all though she was. Why would you want to keep it anyway?


Comment #17 by: N/A on 13 Dec 2011, 06:04 UTC reply to this comment

In line 8 (going from bottom to top) there is a typo "becasue oncce the become man and wife..." should be they.

Comment #17.1 by: Elena Gorgan on 13 Dec 2011, 08:07 GMT

Thank you for the heads-up, you're right, there was a typo. A correction has been made.

Best,

Elena Gorgan

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM