Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Life and Style > Television

July 11th, 2011, 08:48 GMT · By

Jerry Springer Says He’d Never Interview Casey Anthony

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Jerry Springer says he’d not interview alleged killer Casey Anthony even if she paid him to do it
Enlarge picture
Late last week, rumors were starting to make the rounds that Casey Anthony, the woman recently found not guilty of murdering her own daughter and the dumping her body in the woods, was wanted for the Jerry Springer show. That’s not true, Jerry himself says.

Springer is known for his penchant for the scandalous and controversial, thanks to the show that bears his name, which sees family disputes play out in front of the cameras.

As such, few were not really surprised when word got out that his producers had already sent a $1 million offer to Anthony’s camp, with the condition that her parents also be on the show, because they too were part of the problem, as the much-mediated trial revealed.

The report was first denied by Springer’s producers, who denied the existence of the offer in a statement to PopEater.

TMZ caught up with the show host himself and got a very round denial of the rumors: he would never interview Anthony, not even if he were paid to do it.

“Absolutely, unequivocally not true” is how Springer described the early report about doing a show with Anthony.

He then went on to say that she should not profit from the death of her daughter, regardless whether she killed her or not. He wanted to do his part to make sure that didn’t happen, so he would not even consider doing an interview.

Moreover, Springer wouldn’t do the sit-down even if Anthony paid him to do it.

“God as my witness, I would never interview her. You could pay me the million dollars, I wouldn’t do it,” he said.

He also said he’d quit his job if producers found a way to force him to interview the alleged killer.

In the same impromptu interview with the paparazzi, Springer made another valid point: his show never had celebrities on it, no matter what we understood by the term “celebrity.”

This was one of the most important conditions, he stressed, before waving goodbye to the paps. See the video here


996 hits · 2 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Casey Anthony Juror Speaks on Verdict: Not Guilty Doesn’t Mean Innocent

Casey Anthony Will Probably Pose for Playboy

Mike ‘The Situation’ Sorrentino Wants Out of Jersey Shore

First Details on Charlie Sheen’s New Show: TV Version of ‘Anger Management’

Cheap Celebrity Culture and Talent Shows Are Selling Lies to Teens

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: SUSIE on 11 Jul 2011, 12:12 UTC reply to this comment

I sincerely hope Jerry Springer does NOT have that monster on his show.

Just because she was acquitted by twelve jurors who were incapable of connecting the dots (unfathomable!) - does NOT mean she is innocent.

She is not innocent - any fool could see what she did.

Thank you.

Natalie

Comment #1.1 by: ron on 11 Jul 2011, 15:13 GMT

I second that...makes you wonder these days what had happen to morality...we are failing in keeping people like her locked up but truely quick to lock someone like Micheal Vicks up for animal cruelty...

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM