NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Science / Nature

Nature


Japan Says It Will Arrest Sea Shepherd Members This Year

The threat was completely ignored by the organization

By Tudor Vieru, Science Editor

10th of December 2008, 08:26 GMT

Adjust text size:


A picture of the MV Steve Irwin, Sea Shepherd's flagship
Enlarge picture
Japanese officials recently announced that, if the environmental group Sea Shepherd interfered with its “scientific” harvesting of whales in the Southern Ocean, activists would be arrested and detained by authorities. The threat comes after a disastrous whaling season last year, when Japan's fleet was deterred from completing its quota by both Sea Shepherd and Greenpeace vessels, which virtually chased the giant ships throughout the Ocean, until the end of the season.

 

The hard-line environmental group announced that later this month all ships caught near the whale reservations in the Southern Ocean would be rammed and sunk. Its flagship, the MV Steve Irwin, was previously used in similar actions, when it hit the whaling factory ship, Kaiko Maru, an event that left both vessels with holes on their sides. Sea Shepard vowed to ram Japanese ships in 2009 as well, saying that their actions were illegal and that whaling was prohibited since 1982.

 

In regard to the Japanese threats, Captain Paul Watson, the leader of the group, says “When you are willing to die for a whale, the threat of arrest is somewhat trivial. It can only further our cause of defending the whales if the Japanese take Sea Shepherd crew members hostage and haul them back to Japan for prosecution. The diplomatic, political and jurisdictional issues will be profound.”

 

“We must never forget that Japan is targeting threatened and endangered whales in an officially established whale sanctuary in violation of a global moratorium on commercial whaling and in defiance and contempt of an Australian Federal Court ruling prohibiting the killing of whales in the Australian Antarctic Territory,” adds Kim McCoy, executive director of Sea Shepherd International.

 

From a legal standpoint, the actions of the organization are justified, as the 1982 UN moratorium on endangered species asks for individuals and non-governmental organizations to uphold the law and insure that no one violates the international treaty, which Japan is clearly doing.

 

This is not the first time the Asian nation tries to stop the organization – in 2006 it requested the UK to remove the MV Steve Irwin from the Ship Registry, which a cowardly British ruling did. The ship was later registered in the Netherlands, so it could continue its activity. Currently, the ship is at sea, carrying, among its crew members, actress Daryl Hannah.

TAGS:

Sea Shepherd | Japan | whaling | direct action | Greenpeace
Read by 1,920 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.7/5) 10 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Actress Daryl Hannah Joins Anti-Whaling Activists

Japanese Ministry Imports First Whale Meat in 17 Years

Australia and Japan in Dissent Over Whale Hunt

Ships Must Now Avoid Right Whale Paths

Beluga Whale Classified as Endangered

Assessing Whale Health with RC Helicopters

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Benedita on 11 Dec 2008, 11:26 GMT reply to this comment

Great article, the only thing between the Japanese killer ships and these intelligent sentient mammals is Sea Shepherd. The so called anti whaling countries should hang their heads in shame. Greenpeace too. as they have let their supporters down and not sent a ship this year.

Comment #1.1 by: maria on 11 Dec 2008, 12:09 GMT

I agree with you, Greenpeace and the Australian Government should be ashamed. Thank god there are people who are willing to risk their lives to stand up for these animals. I support the Sea Shepard conservation society and believe they are doing the right thing.


Comment #2 by: Tracie on 11 Dec 2008, 17:19 GMT reply to this comment

WAY TO GO for the Sea Shepherds and Greenpeace! I am very happy with their efforts. It is so long overdue for the Japanese and Asian people of the world to stop destroying our oceans and their inhabitants! I am a teacher and would love to go and help them out!!!! Keep up the great work!


Comment #3 by: whalo on 12 Dec 2008, 03:30 GMT reply to this comment

What a great article! Very well written. We wish Sea Shepherd all the best, to continue the fight - but they need to pay for fuel and vegan food for their ships so lets all do our part and donate online to www.seashepherd.org and help them a little bit.
No great loss that Greenpeace didn't go down to Antarctica, a few banners and picture taking wasn't going to bother the Japanese anyway.
Ever wondered why Sea Shepherd don't have any dying whale pics? Because when the Whalers see them coming they run!! And while the Japanese are scampering off, they can't kill whales.


Comment #4 by: DEAN on 15 Dec 2008, 05:33 GMT reply to this comment

The sea idiots are nothing more than terrorists and need to be treated like the pirates off the coast of Africa


Comment #5 by: Sid on 15 Dec 2008, 08:28 GMT reply to this comment

I do not condemn Greenpeace for taking the less-appealing diplomatic route. Direct assault on another vessel, although very seductive and exciting, is counterproductive to starchier and mundane diplomacy. Unfortunately, it is diplomacy and education that change hearts and minds permanently.

There's a right way and a wrong way to bringing about change. Bringing change through the use of force never truly changes the mindset of a people - it simply hardens their stance against the change.

Although I would agree with the writer's conclusion of the legality of Sea Shepherd's actions, the UN moratorium on endangered species covers endangered and threatened species. A quick check of the IUCN Red List shows that Minke whale populations are "well above the thresholds for a threatened category", which make me doubt Sea Shepherd's claim of legal backing by this provision.

The largest problem with governmental involvement is that only a handful of countries recognize Australia's sovereignity over the Antarctic waters that house the whale sanctuary, and Japan is not one of them.

This is why diplomacy will work in the long run; the Japanese government has to be convinced to officially recognize Australia's claim over those waters before Australia can send military vessels in and chase off the Japanese whalers. If Australia sent in vessels today, it would constitute an act of war on the high seas, as the sanctuary is *outside* the 200 mile continental exclusive economic zone of Australia, which IS officially recognized world-wide as the limit of Australian domestic power.

The irony is that the actions of Sea Shepherd may actually be hurting the chances of long-term resolution through its use of short-term actions. It is very difficult to convince the Japanese government of your sovereign power in the Antarctic waters when you do nothing about a ship of terrorists (in their eyes) who openly attack their boats.


Comment #6 by: tudor vieru on 15 Dec 2008, 10:42 GMT reply to this comment

@DEAN

I find your attitude fundamentally wrong, and as such, I must say that you really don't have any idea what you're talking about. The fact that a bad thing is legal doesn't make it ok, and the more people stand up for what is right, through whatever means necessary, the better. Think of that before you go around calling everyone a terrorist, just because they conflict with what you believe in.

@SID
very well written. I agree with you completely. However, maybe a combined approach on the matter will work better.


Comment #7 by: Demex on 27 Dec 2008, 07:01 GMT reply to this comment

Wow, those Japanese people seem pretty nice. If they came near my boat I'd open fire on them with a rifle. Obviously they are no Americans. Take up arms against those terrorists! They attacked you first, sounds like self defense. =]

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM