Search Perform an advanced search query SOFTPEDIA
 
SOFTPEDIA
Updated one minute ago
HomeSubmit a program for being reviewedAdvertise on our websiteGet help on surfing our websitesSend us your feedbackGet information about our XML/RSS backend and how to use itBrowse the news archiveVisit our discussion forumVizitati forumul in limba romana



KLIP
  1. HOME
  2. SCIENCE
  3. TECHNOLOGY
  4. WEBMASTER
  5. SECURITY
  6. MICROSOFT
  7. LINUX
  8. APPLE
  9. GAMES
  10. TELECOMS
  11. REVIEWS
  12. LIFE & STYLE
  13. EDITORIALS
  14. INTERVIEWS
  15. RSS
Welcome!
Hello, Guest

Login if you have a Softpedia.com account.

Otherwise, register for one.

CPU

Isaiah beats Atom in Public Benchmark

- VIA scores big on the UMPC market

By: Bogdan Botezatu, Hardware Editor

The upcoming ultra-mobile PC offerings will be powered by either VIA's low-voltage Isaiah processor or by Intel's Atom chip. Those of you who are wondering which one delivers the best bang per buck can now get an overview
of the two chips' performance.

The benchmark was conducted by the German tech website Eee PC News using an Intel Atom processor clocked at 1.6GHz and a VIA Isaiah/CN processor, clocked at the same core speed of 1.6GHz. In order to make things funnier, the benchmarkers also compared the results to an 1.6 GHz Celeron-M and an 1.6GHz VIA C7 chip.

All the four processors have been tested using the CrystalMark 2004R3 benchmarking software, but the final results only include the CPU ALU and FPU numbers.

Incredibly enough, VIA's statement about Isaiah being twice as fast as the old and weary C7-M chip were accurate. The Isaiah processor managed to achieve more than twice the performance of the former C7-M.

More than that, VIA's Isaiah scored more points in the FPU benchmark even as compared to the Celeron-M processor. The lightweight Isaiah made it through the test with 7619 points, which is 1539 points more than Celeron's final score of 6080.

The ALU scores are also a surprise, given the fact that VIA's Isaiah seems to outperform the Atom all-in-one-wonder chip. Despite the fact that the Atom chip achieved 4,601 points, VIA's Isaiah/CN processor is still leading with a total score of 4,762. This might not be as impressive as the FPS score, but still it proves VIA's supremacy on the low-voltage CPU market.

The rest of the benchmark test is still a mystery, but if the scores are similar across the entire tests, VIA's future on the ultra-mobile market is painted in bright colors.

However, there is yet another big issue that needs addressing before jumping to the final conclusions: pricing. Although Intel hinted at the ultra-low manufacturing costs for its low-energy chips, there is no clue about the final retail prices. VIA is also keeping prices wrapped up, which makes the comparison even harder.

If VIA manages to keep a reasonable price per 1,000-tray units, it might eventually succeed in imposing a new trend on the UMPC market, a trend that started with the advent of HP's state-of-the-art 2133 Mini-Note PC.

MORE RELATED ARTICLES: HP's Mini-Note Refresh, to Come With Wither Intel Atom or VIA Isaiah Chips Intel, ST Microelectronics to Double Phase-Change Memory (PCRAM) Chips Density Carbon, the New King in the Semiconductor Industry
 
Comments | Link here | Subscribe
Print | Send to friend
Today's News | Yesterday's News

Search:


21st April 2008, 13:09 GMT | Copyright (c) 2008 Softpedia | Contact:
Read by 1,024 user(s) | Rating: | 5 vote(s) so far | Cast your vote:
Isaiah beats Atom in Public Benchmark - USER OPINIONS




We are sorry, there are no opinions available for this article.






SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT Isaiah beats Atom in Public Benchmark

Since you are not logged on, your comments will have to be approved before being displayed.
Click here to login, or register.
Your Name:
Your Email:
Type in the result:
Your Opinion:
 


DO YOU WANT TO CONTACT US?  

If you have some comments or you want to send us some information you can send us an email directly to .
You can use the form below for the same purpose.
Your full name: (at least 3 characters)
Your email address: (at least 5 characters)
Message subject: (at least 5 characters)
Message text:
(at least 10 characters)
Type in the result:
 
 



© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved.
Softpedia™ and Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.
Copyright Information | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Softpedia | Update your software | Archive