Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Entertainment > Fashion police

December 11th, 2006, 14:56 GMT · By

Is That Real Fur? Oops, Is That an Upskirt Pic?

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


The world just can't get enough: first, there was Paris. Then came Lindsay and later Britney Spears. Oh, but sure, Madonna did all that years before these brats, the only difference being that she didn't do it in front of the paparazzi and their almighty cameras... no, she did it on stage, where you had to pay good money to see it, or in her videos!

Maybe out of jealousy for being overshadowed or maybe just because she wasn't careful enough (I simply refuse to believe the paps got on their knees for the second photo; I mean, the security around this woman in tight!), Madonna came very close (about an inch or so up her skirt) to pulling a Britney.

By 'a Britney' I'm referring to what else but to what the pop singer did a couple of weeks ago, when her secret place, K-Fed's former playground, became no longer a secret to the entire world. There is no information yet as to whether Madge (I hear that's how they call Madonna in the UK) was wearing panties or whether she was trying to really get into the celebrity mood and had no such thing on.

Fortunately, we will never know and I say that we should all be thankful that her skirt was tight enough and long enough to prevent us from seeing the place where it all began. However, there are some bits and pieces about what happened before the so-close-full-crotch-flashing and maybe that's where we could find an explanation for such a slip.

They say that Madonna and Guy are experiencing huge problems because of the adoption of little David Banda and although they are only a couple of weeks away from their six-year marriage anniversary, they might not make it that far. Sources claim the couple had dinner at a restaurant in London and they fought all the time about how controlling and narrow-minded she is. But that's just a rumor, anyway...

Plus, she must have guessed that wearing that genuine chinchilla fur coat will get her into a lot of trouble with those PETA guys. It's no wonder she was that absent-minded as to almost show us her coochie...

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

37,530 hits · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Your Daily Share of Pussy, Courtesy of Lindsay

Not a Day Goes by Panty-less

Lindsay Is Letting the Firecrotch Ventilate

I Kid You Not, Britney Is TOTALLY Wearing Panties!

Guess Who Else (JLo) Is Not Wearing Panties?

READER COMMENTS:



No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion!
Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM