Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Security > Digital Rights/Piracy

November 9th, 2011, 12:59 GMT · By Eduard Kovacs

Internet Filtering Case Verdict Expected From European Court of Justice

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Cedric Manara explains why filtering systems cannot work efficiently
Enlarge picture
The European Court of Justice will soon make a ruling in a case between an ISP and a music rights group. The decision will show if an internet service provider can be forced to filter the traffic of their account holders for copyright infringements.

According to TorrentFreak, the Belgian music rights group SABAM and Scarlet ISP are battling for a few years now, the first verdict in 2007 being in favor of the former which wanted to fight against piracy by filtering internet traffic.

Because the system mandated by SABAM didn't function as it was planned, the court undid its first decision and the case was taken over by the Brussels Court of Appeal and now the European Court of Justice has to make a ruling.

In the meantime, intellectual property expert Prof. Cedric Manara published a paper in which he highlights the risks implied by a filtering system, considering the fact that such a mechanism would involve spying on users.

He also mentions that current laws already ban such monitoring systems which could even affect legitimate companies from conducting business due to the way the blocking system functions.

“With such a measure aimed at filtering and blocking everything listed in the collective management society comprehensive way possible, one can imagine a video whose creator or producer wishes to put online; it would be blocked as soon as it was recognized by the access provider leading also to unsolvable conflicts of interest between the artists and producers themselves, both having distinct rights over the same works,” Manara claims.

The main issue is caused by the fact that the system proposed by SABAM is not technically complex enough. The fingerprinting software that was mandated in 2007 failed miserably because it's too difficult to precisely pinpoint if a material is or isn't shared within the law.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

913 hits · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Tenenbaum Seeks 'En Banc' Hearing in File-Sharing Case

UK Premium Rate Service Regulator Joins Fight Against Piracy

Spanish Judge: Piracy Doesn't Always Affect Sales

New Zealand 'Skynet' Law Starts Making Victims

Book Publishers Don't Want to Be Taken 'For Dummies'

READER COMMENTS:



No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion!
Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM