Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Webmaster > Internet Life

June 17th, 2011, 09:41 GMT · By

Internet Explorer Won't Be Supporting WebGL

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


WebGL won't be supported in Internet Explorer, says Microsoft
Enlarge picture
WebGL is facing a tough future, at least the foreseeable one, now that Microsoft has officially come out and said that it won't be supporting WebGL in Internet Explorer, citing security concerns as the main reason behind this.

Microsoft exemplified this through a number of third-party reports that showed flaws and potential vulnerabilities in WebGL, both at the standard level as well in the actual browser implementations.

The latest is a flaw in Firefox which could enable attackers to retrieve any image used in the browser by getting users to visit a specially-designed website. This flaw will be fixed in Firefox 5, coming a few days from now.

Microsoft explains its main grips with the 3D graphics standard and concludes that, at least for now, WebGL is too insecure for its standards and that it won't be using it.

"We believe that WebGL will likely become an ongoing source of hard-to-fix vulnerabilities. In its current form, WebGL is not a technology Microsoft can endorse from a security perspective," Microsoft said in a blot post titled "WebGL Considered Harmful."

"We recognize the need to provide solutions in this space however it is our goal that all such solutions are secure by design, secure by default, and secure in deployment," it added.

Whether WebGL is actually insecure or not is debatable. Clearly, there is still work to be done on the technology and anything that digs this deep into an operating system, in this case by working with the actual video card drivers, is going to pose a risk, especially since drivers are not built with security in mind.

Considering how many bugs video drivers have in general and how unreliable they have proven, there shouldn't be any problems in finding vulnerabilities in them. But those problems lie more with the drivers than with WebGL.

There is another angle to this, WebGL competes, in a way with its own 3D graphics API DirectX, which is a lot more popular on Windows than OpenGL, WebGL's sister standard developed by the same Khronos Group.

That said, Google, Mozilla, Opera and Apple are all supporting WebGL in their browsers, to varying degrees. And the standard has the support of big hardware industry players, Nvidia and AMD among them.

So WebGL is not going anywhere any time soon. It will give developers a tougher time though, considering that the world's most popular browser won't include WebGL for the time being.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

3,146 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Beautiful Google Search Volume 3D Visualization Demos WebGL's Strengths

Danger Mouse and Daniele Luppi Music Plus WebGL Equals '3 Dreams of Black'

Mozilla Demos the New 'Progress' HTML5 Element in Firefox 6

Google I/O: Angry Birds for the Web in the Chrome Store, Uses HTML5 and WebGL

Google I/O: 160 Million Chrome Users, Multiple Profiles and Tab Sync Coming

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Jim on 18 Jun 2011, 03:33 UTC reply to this comment

Who uses IE that will need to access webGL powered websites? Anyone that doesn't know the difference between a good browser (Chrome, ff, opera, safari) and a bad one (IE) will not need to view webGL based websites, and microsoft once again shows why everyone calls their stuff the technology of the future from yesterday.

Comment #1.1 by: xXTechyXx on 03 Aug 2011, 03:09 GMT

Well IE is definitly better then googlechrome by far and firefox still needs to catch up. google chrome cant even run flash properly, what comparrison have you used for these in order to distinguish that IE is a bad browser? I think you should consider what you are saying because there are alot of people that will stray from the best browser and go towards buggy, and unreliable browsers just from your posts.


Comment #2 by: Dave on 11 Jul 2011, 09:27 UTC reply to this comment

Microsoft's excuse for not supporting WebGL is so lame as to fail the laugh test. Nice try, Redmond! When you promise us to fix your own seemingly endless supply of security flaws, you'll have more credibility to make such statements.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM