Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Sci Pry

January 13th, 2009, 07:12 GMT · By

Internet Buys to Be Taxed Soon

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Shopping online could soon pull more money out of your pocket
Enlarge picture
On account of the economic downturn, several states are pondering the possibility of starting to collect taxes on Internet purchases, in an attempt to address the worsening state of their budgets. Naturally, the move sparked vivid controversy, and online stores are thoroughly displeased with the proposed measure, as they have been enjoying this facility for a very long time. In one case, the state of New York even requires companies such as Amazon to charge its residents with shipping fees, although Amazon bases its operations elsewhere.

If we take into account the online shopping total revenue for the entire country, a rough estimate places the sum that the government would stand to benefit from at around $3 billion. Sucharita Mulpuru, a financial analyst for Forrester Research, says that online sales accounted for as much as 8 percent of all retail in the US in 2008, totaling about $204 billion, which is a drastic increase from the levels of 2007, when Internet buys collected $175 billion.

According to a 1992 Supreme Court ruling, states are not allowed to impose sales taxes on online shops if they do not have a “physical” presence in that state. In other words, the only retailers that can be subjected to the new tax are those who have office buildings or warehouses on the property of the state imposing the fee.

But even that won't be enough to get the new system going pretty soon. Law makers still have to untangle the intricate network of jurisdictions that are shared by states, counties and cities, and to agree on the amount of tax for each product. Currently, every jurisdiction demands a different tax for similar products, and bringing the numbers together will be quite a hassle.

However, the new initiative could fail, on account of the fact that changing legislation on the matter can be very difficult and expensive. Although the crisis will still prompt states to try and impose the taxes, they will also be discouraged from doing so by the large costs involved with the process, and some states already renounced doing so after being presented with a rough estimate.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

997 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Shopping Online Could Help Reduce Overall Prices

Experts Say 'Reuse' Is the Slogan of Tomorrow

Wikipedia Succeeds in Raising $6 Million

Actually Holding an Item Makes People Likely to Buy It

Russian Entrepreneur Wants to Trademark the 'Wink'

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: marytee on 13 Jan 2009, 11:38 UTC reply to this comment

It's about time. Much of what I used to purchase in actual stores I purchase on line. I don't have an issue with states recouping the taxes. I would have an issue if they upped the tax rate.


Comment #2 by: Eric on 13 Jan 2009, 21:53 UTC reply to this comment

As someone that runs an e-commerce store, I can only imagine the hassle this would cause.

My manufacturing facility is in CA, so I only need to tax those in CA, and in turn submit this to CA during tax time. However, breaking out up to 50 different tax rates for all the different states and properly paying them all would be a nightmare.

I would support a flat tax rate for all internet sales, however, say 5% or so. That way, we would just have to break out sales by ship to state without the headache of the countless tax rates. States would still get a cut, and it wouldn't even impact our business, not to mention that fact that it wouldn't cost thousands of dollars to implement.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM