Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > Video

January 25th, 2010, 15:44 GMT · By

Intel's GMA HD Benchmarked

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Intel's GMA HD gets benchmarked
Enlarge picture
Intel recently launched the Clarkdale and Arrandale central processing units with integrated graphics, but most focus has been so far on their actual processing power than on their graphics capabilities. This can be seen as rather surprising, considering the fact that these integrated graphics were supposed to be one of the key elements that would differentiate the new processors from the competition. More recently, however, even though somewhat late, the folks over at Bit-tech.net have finally completed their incursion into the 45nm GPU that comes as a part of the new chips.

While the CPU's graphics performance when gaming was, predictably, nothing to be shocked by, it seems that Intel was genuinely successful in making the integrated graphics circuits quite highly adept at handling video. According to the review, the Intel GMA HD actually “has an advanced feature set especially if you're interested in high quality video playback.”

Intel seems to have put special effort into optimizing the graphics solution for video, knowing that, as far as gaming and overall high-end graphics performance was concerned, it was not going to be on par with that of NVIDIA or AMD cards. The GMA HD is capable of bitstreaming, Blu-ray playback with picture-in-picture and HDMI 1.3a support. Also, in addition to the very smooth HD video playback, the chips also showed a power consumption only a couple of Watts higher than that of competing solutions.

The overall conclusion of the reviewers is that the new Clarkdale and Arrandale processors with integrated graphics achieve a balanced combination of raw performance, video features and efficiency. Nevertheless, the CPUs are definitely not very suited for gaming, especially playing the newer titles. In fact, gaming-wise, the graphics were found to only be capable of competing with hardware launched one to two years ago. As such, playful end-users will have to turn to AMD or NVIDIA to sate their appetite.
FILED UNDER:
Intel
GMA
graphics
GPU
video

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

13,187 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Intel's WiDi Helps Play Back Laptop-Stored Videos on a TV

Intel Milestone Yields Faster-Switching Transistors

Core i7 930 Set for Release by the End of February

Apple Doesn't Want Arrandale's Integrated Graphics

AMD Launches Five New CPUs

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: James Apperson on 11 Feb 2010, 01:38 UTC reply to this comment

I am not sure what a "playful end-user" is, but it sounds naughty.
Anyways, the article was very vague about the video game aspect of the technology it was attempting to cover.
With that in mind,
I do not feel it empowered me to make a reasonably informed decision about whether or not a MB/CPU combo of this tech will suit my mid-range gaming* interests.
(Newest games like Bioshock 2) on low settings, slightly dated games (like Fo3, bioshock 1, and Quake wars)on medium settings, and classic games (UT3) on high settings).

Everyone knows that "onboard" graphics aren't what "modern gamers" rely on,
but every time a company "claims" to have addressed that,
we'd really like to hear that plainly confirmed or refuted by trusted sources.
-Instead, we get vague discouragements that may or may not really apply to the average gamer.

I am also not able to tell if adding a modern PCI-E Vid Card to the tech mentioned in this article,
will fully perform to it's potential in such a system.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM