Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > Video

December 7th, 2011, 00:31 GMT · By

Intel: Integrated GPUs Can Compete, But User’s Perception Needs to Change

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Intel talks about integrated graphics
Enlarge picture
Intel has made great strides in improving the graphics performance of its chips since the introduction of its Sandy Bridge architecture at the start of this year, but the company believes that they have to change how computer users perceive these solutions in order for them to become truly popular.

"I would say that the biggest thing that we're up against is perception,” said Pat Bliemer, Managing Director for Northern Europe and Benelux at Intel, in an exclusive interview with the Nordic Hardware website.

“And it's not as much as actual performance or that ours is not as good as theirs [referring to AMD] or vice versa.

“I do think that there still is a notion with an average computer user that you need to have a discrete graphics solution and that integrated graphics is not as competitive,” continued Mr. Bliemer. “And I think this applies as much to AMD as it does to us right?"

Intel’s rep continued by saying that even if integrated graphics have greatly improved in the last year users still believe that using the built-in GPU found inside today’s processors won’t actually allow them to run the games they want or use high resolutions modes on their monitors.

According to Bliemer all these myths will continue to live on for quite some time from now, but eventually people will realize that built-in GPUs are good enough for most of the tasks that they run.

“We do think that more people will realize that what they actually have in their CPUs is good enough to run 99,98 percent of the things that they do.

“If you talk about mainstream gaming you can elegantly do it already based on GT2 [Intel HD 3000] solutions that we have,” said Bliemer.

While some of you wouldn’t agree with this last claim, there’s no denying the fact the integrated graphics have come a long way in the short time since Intel and AMD started adding GPUs to their processors, and with the advent of Ivy Bridge and Trinity the next year, integrated graphics will definitely become even faster than today.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,010 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Intel’s 2012 Mobile Ivy Bridge CPU Lineup Revealed

Intel Core i3-2370M and i5-2450M CPUs Could Launch on December 11

Intel's First Android 4.0 Powered Tablets Will Arrive in Spring 2012

AMD A8-3870K and A6-3670K Unlocked APUs Listed for Pre-Order

AMD’s 28nm Radeon HD 7670M and HD 7690M Spotted in Asus and HP Notebooks

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Poops on 07 Dec 2011, 01:34 UTC reply to this comment

Quote:"
Intel’s rep continued by saying that even if integrated graphics have greatly improved in the last year users still believe that using the built-in GPU found inside today’s processors won’t actually allow them to run the games they want or use high resolutions modes on their monitors."


It's because it is true.
Why not play Battlefield in Full HD with Max settings on with HD 3000?

Comment #1.1 by: hmm on 03 Jan 2012, 13:03 GMT

But the HD 3000 doesn't support DX11.
Dell, HP, Microsoft, and Intel now pretty much sums up "mainstream gaming" as in playing those flash games not BF3


Comment #2 by: dcomputerman on 04 May 2012, 21:21 UTC reply to this comment

I'm the .02!

Since Intel has yet to produce worthwhile integrated graphics, the problem is not with Intel, it's with the consumer--just change your expectations... I'm hopeful that's not what they actually meant. According to Tom's Hardware, Intel's best graphics (HD 3000) are roughly equivalent to an nVidia 600GT or ATI 9800XT (yes I know it's AMD now, back then it was ATI). While these were great CPUs....what 5 years ago(?), they're now in the 23rd ranked performance category. An AMD HD5450 for $30 that any at least semi-literate gamer wouldn't even consider, outperforms the integrated graphics for gaming. Splurge and go up to a ...say HD3650 refurb (old chipset also) for $38 and see major performance increase.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM