Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > CPU

August 24th, 2009, 06:53 GMT · By

Intel Core i3 540 with Integrated Clarkdale Graphics Benchmarked

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Engineering sample of Intel's Core i3 540 with Clarkdale graphics
Enlarge picture
Santa Clara, California-based Intel, the world's leading vendor of computer processors, is expected to announce the launch of its first desktop processors with integrated graphics, codenamed Clarkdale. These new chips are due out sometime in early 2010 and should be part of the company's new line of Core i3 family, aimed at entry-level systems and designed to deliver the necessary performance for powering some of the upcoming mainstream computers. On that note, it looks like we now have the very first benchmark results of these new processors and we can compare them with the performance levels of some of today's other graphics chips.

According to a recent article on the Chinese-language HKEPC.com, the upcoming Clarkdale processors and their integrated graphics core should deliver a performance level comparable to that of today's mainstream solutions. The fellows over at HKEPC have been lucky enough to put the chip through its paces, a few good months ahead of its official release. Reportedly dubbed Core i3 540, this new solution was still an engineering sample and the results could vary when it will be officially released. The chip was clocked at 3.06GHz and came with 4MB of L3 cache, support for Hyper-Threading technology, while the graphics core was set at 700MHz, although the final version should deliver a frequency of 733MHz.

Performance results of Intel's next-generation Core i3 540 processor
Enlarge picture
In 3DMark 06, the Clarkdale graphics core managed to score 1602 points, compared to the 1181 points received by Intel's current integrated graphics product, the GMA X4500HD, or the 2014 points received by NVIDIA's current 9400 IGP. In 3DMark Vantage the situation remained the same, with the X4500HD scoring E3508, the Clarkdale processor reaching E3980 and NVIDIA's 9400 IGP reaching E4445 points.

Essentially, the Clarkdale solution with integrated graphics will deliver a graphics performance over the current Intel IGP, but lower than NVIDIA's GeForce 9400, which has been around for some time and is due for a refresh in the near future. The results are still based on an engineering sample and we might see some changes when the chip is officially released, but even so, this should give some users a perspective on what is coming from Intel.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

16,573 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Intel Plans Shipments of 32nm 'Clarkdale' in Q4

Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs to Make a Debut at CES 2010

Intel to Launch 32nm Clarkdale CPUs in Q4

Intel Clarkdale Processors Coming in Q1 2010

CeBIT 2009: Intel Gives Details on 32nm Technology

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Tryz on 28 Aug 2009, 03:11 UTC reply to this comment

wat an abysmal...GPU(if thats was u want to calll it..)from Intell....

Comment #1.1 by: Chris on 22 Aug 2010, 15:57 GMT

@Tryz: The point of the Clarksdale graphics isn't for gaming, they give a low end solution to those who wish to build budget computers or for those who have no need for a graphics card. I know you AMD fanboys will bash Intel for pretty much anything, but in case you forgot, you don't have to use it if you don't want to. Considering where Intel was with its Extreme Graphics setup, they've come along quite a ways.


Comment #2 by: crustyporkrhine on 25 Oct 2011, 23:57 UTC reply to this comment

I think that the Intel i3 is quite good considering that it is not a “custom” card. I have done cutting edge gaming for years, but now that i am older it is time to grow up(at least a little) so gaming is not my primary or secondary concern,. but it is still a concern for me. so i bought a quadro laptop with i3 graphics and it surprisingly is around an NVidia 8800(non gt) not the greatest, but I run games such as Fallout Vegas in (1152x864) and dead space in 1360x768 full settings also Hunted full settings and fear 3 on medium so.. It is not terrible for a budget system i even play my dolphin emu on it.So, nose up if you want, but I say it is a pretty nice graphics system for what it is. on the downside, it barely played assassins creed and dead rising 2. So ... like i said , not bad.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM