NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Technology / CPU

CPU


Intel Atom Will Not Replace Celeron Processors

According to Intel's Paul Otellini

By Traian Teglet, Technology News Editor

18th of July 2008, 10:19 GMT

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
Despite the fact that Intel's Atom processor is generating an increasing amount of interest on behalf of many manufacturers of computer systems, the worldwide leading processor maker doesn't see the Atom replacing its Celeron CPUs. At least not in the near future. "At this point in time, we do not see [Intel Atom] replacing Celeron," said Paul Otellini, chief executive officer of Intel Corp.

As most of you already know by now, the Intel Atom processors are
responsible for powering the already successful Eee PC and its direct competitors, Wind and Aspire One. Most systems manufactures prefer to go for them because they can provide better performance compared with the Celeron CPUs. This makes them ideal for low-cost netbooks and nettops and, according to the Santa Clara-based chip maker, this is exactly what the Atoms were designed for.

"If you look at the products that are being built, the netbook products that are being built around Atom, they are all lower priced, lower featured, smaller screen sized notebooks aimed at first-time buyers or the second, third or fourth machine in a household. I don't see it cannibalizing, at least in terms of current sales out, and I think we really have hit on a new product category here," Mr. Otellini explained.

On the other hand, the Celerons have been specifically built to power entry-level and low-performance mainstream systems, which are aimed at customers without many requirements or who have to made do with a low budget. However, after Intel rolled out the Core 2 chips, this job was left in the "hands" of the Pentium processors, while prices for the Celerons were lowered until they reached the $34-$54 range. At this moment, some of the Atom chips for netboks and nettops are available for prices similar to those of the Celerons.

"We're still sorting out the brand activity in our mainstream notebooks. It is clearly Centrino and Core is where the thrust is going to be, and we're trying to… We will sort out and ultimately talk about where Pentium-based notebooks and Celeron-based notebooks live as these categories sort themselves out. But I think it's premature to say [anything], except that we don't see any cannibalization," Mr. Otellini added.

TAGS:

Intel | Atom | Celeron | CPU | processor
Read by 1,880 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
NOT RATED 0 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Eee Box Arrives in Singapore

Intel Optimistic about the Notebook Market

Intel Atom's Impact on the IPCs Market

Intel's Pat Gelsinger Puts Intel Inside Everything

AMD's Atom Competitor to Be Launched by the End of the Year

Intel's Atom - A Nine-Year Old Project!?

Five Million Eee PCs by the Year's End, Says ASUS CEO Jerry Shen

Intel May Delay Its Next-Generation Nehalem Processors

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Neil on 04 Jan 2009, 12:10 GMT reply to this comment

You have made a mistake in your text.
The Performance of the Celeron is MUCH faster than that of the ATOM.
As an example, the Celeron 2.0 is DOUBLE the speed of an Atom 1.6

The only advantage to the Atom design is that it is cheaper to make and is slower - thus improving battery life a bit.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM