NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Patches and Vulnerabilities

Patches and Vulnerabilities


If You Think Mac OS X Is More Secure than Windows, Think Again

Reveals a vulnerability study authored by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

28th of March 2008, 18:34 GMT

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
If you think that Mac OS X is more secure than Windows, by all means, think again. Despite the fact that the Cupertino-based hardware company claims that Mac OS X is secure by default and out of the box, data put together by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology comes to contradict Apple's marketing campaigns. After analyzing no less than
six year's worth of vulnerability handling performance and the patch development process of both Microsoft and Apple, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology concluded that the security flaws statistics only point to the insecurity of Mac OS X.

"For both vendors we find that major software development projects (such as a new OS release or Service Pack) consumes resources at the cost of patch development. Our data does not support the common belief that software from Apple is inherently more secure than software from Microsoft. While the average number of unpatched vulnerabilities has stabilized for Microsoft, Apple has bypassed Microsoft and shows an increasing trend. We provided an insight into the vulnerability lifecycle and trends in the insecurity scene based on empirical data and analysis. To properly plan, assess, and justify vulnerability management knowledge of the vulnerability ecosystem is important," reads an excerpt of the "0-Day Patch Exposing Vendors (In)security Performance" whitepaper authored by Stefan Frei, Bernhard Tellenbach, and Bernhard Plattner.

Between January 2002 to December 2007, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology counted no less than 658 high and medium risk vulnerabilities in various Windows operating systems from Windows XP to Windows Vista RTM. During the same period, Apple's platforms were affected by 738 high and medium risk security flaws. The perspective delivered by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology's independent study reveals that Microsoft has been stagnating in terms of the volume of security vulnerabilities, while peaking at 165 in 2006. In contrast, Apple is on an ascendant trend hitting 175 security flaws in 2006 and 220 in 2007.

TAGS:

Microsoft | Apple | Windows | Mac OS X
Read by 2,545 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Fair (2.3/5) 8 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Apple Puts an End to Illegal Safari Installations on Windows PCs

Vista SP1, XP SP3 and Windows 7 Need to Be on the Lookout for Leopard(s)

Apple Pushes Safari Down the Throat of Windows Users, Like It or Not

Between XP SP2 and Vista SP1, Apple Brought a World of Pain on Microsoft

Windows Vista Ultimate RED Comes to Europe

If You Think SP1 Fixed Windows Vista, Think Again

Microsoft Plugs a Dozen Office Security Holes

Microsoft Prepares Its Vista SP1 Heavy Guns - Will Linux and Mac OS X Be Hurt?

Worldwide: Firefox vs. Internet Explorer

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM