Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Sci Pry

February 4th, 2009, 08:19 GMT · By

Iceland Reassesses Its Whaling Decision

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


An overview of Iceland's capital, Reykjavík
Enlarge picture
The new government that has taken control of the country only this week seems a bit more reasonable than its predecessors, activists say, after it has announced that it will carefully revise the whaling policy extension passed on by the other rulers last week. Under the regulation, Iceland was to continue hunting the endangered fin whales for another 5 years, but with increased quotas, of more than 150 pieces. The center-right administration that resigned last week passed on the legislation among its last acts, which means that this phenomenon, of passing on ridiculous and harmful lawas just before leaving office, is not solely the prerogative of people such as George W. Bush.

Despite harsh protest from environmentalists, three years ago, authorities passed legislation that pulled the country out of a 20 year-long ban on whaling, and allowed fishermen to return to the sea in 2006. The season lasted until August 2007, when it was discontinued, but whaling was resumed in May 2008. However, the new powers-that-be decided on Tuesday to bring the country back from the deep economic crisis it was in, and, among the first measures to take, was the nullification of this rule, which subjected the north Atlantic nation to a lot of international criticism.

"We agreed in a government meeting this morning to send a formal warning out to those with vested interests in whaling, saying that the recent decision of the ex-minister of fisheries about increasing the whaling quota for the next five years is now being reconsidered. We intend to make a policy statement about this issue in a few days," Finance and Fisheries Minister Steingrimur Sigfusson said during a press conference on Tuesday.

However, a poll conducted in the country has showed that 67.2 percent of citizens are in favor of a responsible cull, meaning that only a few whales are to be killed annually. Their views are shared by official proponents of whaling, who say they seek to keep the tradition alive. On the other hand, critics maintain that this so-called sport brings down Iceland's prestige level in the eyes of the world, a view that is sadly shared by just 4.1 percent of the population.

The hard-line anti-whaling group Sea Shepherd announced last week that it would take drastic action if the country decided to breach the 1986 UN Charter prohibiting whaling again, and especially if it considered to do so in increased quotas. The organization also blamed Iceland for trading whale meat with Japan, a country whose vessels Sea Shepherd has had "close" contact with over the years. Iceland's ships were also a target for the group in 1986, when the environmentalists' vessels sunk the Hvalur 6 and Hvalur 7 whaling ships.


TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,018 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Iceland Increases Its Hunting Quota for Endangered Fin Whales

Australia Hosts Sea Shepherd, Despite Japan's Requests

Sea Shepherd Forces Japanese Whaling Fleet Away from Whales

Japan Says It Will Arrest Sea Shepherd Members This Year

Top Environmental Victories for 2008

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Thomas Buiter on 05 Feb 2009, 09:15 UTC reply to this comment

It seems that only a complete boycott of icelandic products and services will bring them to think a bit more about this issue.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM