Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Internet Explorer

February 11th, 2011, 20:41 GMT · By

IE9 RC vs. Chrome 10 / 9 vs. Opera 11 vs. Firefox 4.0 – Performance Comparison

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


IE9
Enlarge picture
With the advent of Internet Explorer 9 Release Candidate, Microsoft also made public the latest set of results in the WebKit SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark.

Earlier this week, before IE9 RC downloads were live, I had a chat with Rob Mauceri, Group Program Manager of IE, and Ryan Gavin, Senior Director of IE, and they confirmed to me that once again, Internet Explorer 9 is the fastest browser according to the SunSpider Benchmark.

IE9 RC wrapped up the collection of JS tests in just 209 ms, with Chrome 9 the runner up (238 ms) and Opera 11 coming in third with 240 ms.

The 4th position is occupied by Chrome 10.0 Dev (248 ms), followed by Firefox 4.0 Beta 11 (254 ms), Safari 5.0.3 (310 ms), Firefox 3.6.13 (753 ms) and IE8 (3746 ms).

It’s incredible how much IE9 has evolved, performance-wise, compared to Internet Explorer 8.

“Significant performance improvements in browser speed which, according to the WebKit SunSpider test, is now 35% faster than the IE9 Beta,” revealed Ryan Gavin, Senior Director, Internet Explorer Business and Marketing.

“Coupled with IE9’s innovative approach to graphics processing through hardware acceleration in Windows, IE9 is truly an all-around fast browser opening up opportunities for developers to create rich new experiences.”

The tests were performed with WebKit SunSpider version 0.9.1 running on a Windows 7 Dell Optiplex ( 3.0 GHz Core 2 Duo Intel CPU, 4GB RAM, Intel Integrated Video), Microsoft informed.

However, the Redmond company emphasizes that strong investments were made in terms of performance across the table, and that IE9 RC’s boost in speed is not limited to JS.

SunSpider results for IE9 RC
Enlarge picture
“Internet Explorer 9 RC continues to improve performance for real world customer scenarios,” the software giant said.

“Performance is a multidimensional challenge that spans the 11 browser subsystems. Between the Internet Explorer 9 Beta and Internet Explorer 9 RC releases, over 2,000 changes have been made to improve browser performance for real customer scenarios.

“Internet Explorer 9 RC starts faster, loads webpages faster, and allows you to interact with web pages faster than ever before.”

IE9 RC Supports HTML5 Geolocation, Advances Interoperability

IE9 Privacy and Security Evolve with the RC, Tracking Protection Now Available

IE9 RC Sports a UI Facelift

IE9 RC Performance Superior to IE9 Beta, to All Rival Browsers

Internet Explorer 9 (IE9) Release Candidate (RC) Build 9.0.8080.16413 is available for download here.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

18,216 hits · 12 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


IE9 Reaches New Apex: 25 Million Downloads

IE9 RC Performance Superior to IE9 Beta, to All Rival Browsers

IE9 RC Sports a UI Facelift

IE9 Is Almost Done, Download RC Build 9.0.8080.16413 Now

IE9 RC Supports HTML5 Geolocation, Advances Interoperability

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: yul on 12 Feb 2011, 06:46 UTC reply to this comment

would like to test

-sent via mobile


Comment #2 by: Will on 12 Feb 2011, 11:29 UTC reply to this comment

It's big improvement over IE8,but not having a spell checker still! and all the other browsers have better tab management,such as pinning tabs and tab stacking.

Not crazy about pinning websites to the
Taskbar,aside from Gmail or other sites that are open a lot.
I could live without addons,but they should have added a mail icon that notifies of email with your email client of choice or multiples accounts.

And last but not least,is their slow development.are they going to update it
regularly and not get outpaced by the others?


Comment #3 by: marius on 13 Feb 2011, 14:51 UTC reply to this comment

firefox 11 ? :))

Comment #3.1 by: Marius Oiaga on 15 Feb 2011, 11:47 GMT

It was meant to be FF 4.0 Beta 11... Thank you!


Comment #4 by: Iswanda on 13 Feb 2011, 16:36 UTC reply to this comment

How about Opera 11.. No explanation on this article..


Comment #5 by: nerdymoo on 14 Feb 2011, 02:21 UTC reply to this comment

I always have hesitation to use IE again, though the waves of good comments to IE9 prevail. IE9 on my hand never works any faster than Chrome or FF4 beta's, especially when starting up. Such experience happens more obviously in older PCs (Pentium 4).

Comment #5.1 by: hey on 15 Feb 2011, 11:40 GMT

not sure what you're talking about.. FF always takes extremely long to start up.. IE 9 starts way faster on a fresh boot than FF does.. maybe you should try it out before making judgements

Comment #5.2 by: jg on 19 Feb 2011, 17:57 GMT

ya, check out the RC, its super fast, faster then beta. Very slick browser, I have stopped using Chrome, Opera and FF, and have returned to IE for 9.


Comment #6 by: Dd on 28 Feb 2011, 08:24 UTC reply to this comment

I like IE

Comment #6.1 by: MSFanboy Wintroll Linuxhater on 03 Mar 2011, 20:05 GMT

Contrary to my nickname I actually embrase all things non-MS ;) However I just happened to believe that anything done by MS is not necessarily useless, bloated and evil. It all depends on a particular application.

Until about 5 years ago I was running Firefox. Then it became slow and bloated and I switched to Opera. Still think it's one of the best browsers out there but too many things don't work well (KeePass integration, iNotes, etc.)

For the last 3 years I was a dedicated Chrome user and until today it was the browser of choice for me. However now I am switching to IE9. Why ? Because it feels just as fast, it takes up less memory, and it gives me 2 features Chrome doesn't: (1) I can run it in Full Screen mode and switch tabs by simply moving my mouse up


Comment #7 by: firefoxlover on 14 Mar 2011, 02:58 UTC reply to this comment

yeah IE nine may be fast but the thing is that i am an xp user and i can't use it anymore. why would microsoft leave xp users in dust when xp has the largest usage share?


Comment #8 by: mikah on 17 Mar 2011, 14:29 UTC reply to this comment

Puzzled why Microsoft took so long to come up with so little.
Amazing how few options there are reminds me off a straightjacket , has even less options than Chrome .
Text is blurry
Scrolling is jerky
Has trouble with Flash
No Spell checker
Cannot have the tabs on very top of the screen to take advantage of Fitt's Law makes it useless for laptops.
Slow only benchmark it wins is sunspider google " IE9 cheat Sunspider "

Puzzled why XP users would want to download this second rate browser when they can use Opera.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM