Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Microsoft > Internet Explorer

March 9th, 2011, 17:01 GMT · By

IE9 Leaves Chrome 11, Firefox 4.0 and Safari 5 in the Dust in Hardware Acceleration Test

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

IE9
Enlarge picture
With the RTW (release to web) deadline for Internet Explorer 9 now closer than ever, Microsoft has published the results of a new comparison between the next major iteration of IE and rival browsers.

This time around, the software giant used one of the hardware acceleration tests available to the public on the IE Test Drive site in order to highlight the gap between IE9 and rival next generation browsers.

Santa’s Workshop is a performance demo written entirely in SVG and JavaScript. The more efficiently your browser can animate elves moving around on the screen, the more elves will appear and the faster they’ll be able to pack presents,” noted Seth McLaughlin, Program Manager, Internet Explorer

“Santa’s Workshop uses many emerging HTML5 and SVG patterns, including SVG DOM manipulation, applying transforms to groups of SVG elements, and playing background music through the HTML5 audio tag.”

The company put time and again a strong emphasis on the fact that IE9 is fully hardware accelerated, covering video, audio and graphics content. It also pointed out that rivals such as Mozilla, Google and Apple choose to use the GPU to render only certain examples of content.

A Dell Laptop was used for the test, packing a 2.26 GHz Intel Core i3, 4GB RAM, a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M graphics card, 250GB 7200 RPM drive, and running Windows 7.

Santa’s Workshop results
Enlarge picture
Internet Explorer 9 RC was used for the Santa’s Workshop test, with the Build capable of going as high as 50 elves and no less than 238 presents per minute.

Chrome 11 Canary was runner up, but it only managed to deliver 30% of the quantity of presents that IE9 achieved.

“With Google Chrome 11 we can only achieve 15 elves packing 71 presents per minute. When we look at the CPU, GPU, and updates we see that Google Chrome 11 is essentially using the same amount of machine resources as Internet Explorer 9,” McLaughlin said.

“Firefox 4 (Beta 12) now leverages hardware acceleration by default, however this most recent version of Firefox was only able to achieve 1 elf working and pack 4 presents per minute. In addition, the frame rate quickly fell to 13 frames per second. When we again look at the CPU, GPU, and updates charts you can see that Firefox’s usage of the GPU is very sporadic,” he added.

“Safari 5 did a bit better than Firefox 4 and was able to achieve one elf working and pack four presents per minute at a frame rate of 20fps. Here’s how Safari uses the machines resources to animate the one elf around the screen.”

Internet Explorer 9 (IE9) Release Candidate (RC) Build 9.0.8080.16413 is available for download here.


IE9 Santa’s Workshop
Enlarge picture
Chrome 11 Santa’s Workshop
Enlarge picture
Firefox Santa’s Workshop
Enlarge picture



10,026 hits · 11 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


IE9 vs. Chrome 9.0 vs. Firefox 4.0

IE9 Memory Security Mitigations: DEP/NX, ASLR, SafeSEH and Enhanced GS

IE9 vs. IE8 vs. IE7

New HTML5 Bing Preview Site to Offer Instant Search

Internet Explorer 9 (IE9) Power Tips from Microsoft

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Siddhartha on 09 Mar 2011, 17:52 UTC reply to this comment

Hi Marius. I would like to give a confirmation for this based on my hardware.
I have a basic 4-year old Windows Vista Home Premium (32-bit) laptop on Intel 945GM chipset (integrated GMA950) graphics and Intel Pentium Dual-Core processor.

I ran the Hardware Acceleration Stress test designed by folks at Mozilla (I suppose so) themselves: http://demos.hacks.mozilla.org/openweb/HWACCEL/

On Firefox 4 Beta 11, Beta 12 and RC (pre-builds), I got 7 FPS. And would you believe it - IE9 RC for the same test, gives 37 FPS! If you try and run this yourself, please let me know.

But I am genuinely stumped by this result.


Comment #2 by: Ireckun on 09 Mar 2011, 19:06 UTC reply to this comment

Very interesting, with IE 9 I was able to get 32 Elves packing at 217 presents per minute.


Comment #3 by: KWierso on 09 Mar 2011, 20:17 UTC reply to this comment

This was profiled in Firefox by Rob O'Callahan, and he found that most of the time was spent not in graphics (or hardware acceleration), but in SVG operations. Apparently IE9 has really optimized certain parts of their SVG implementation, and this somehow lets them have the title of "KING OF ACCELERATION", even though it's only doing better than Firefox because of a poor implementation of SVG in Firefox.


Comment #4 by: First on 09 Mar 2011, 20:34 UTC reply to this comment

First


Comment #5 by: John on 10 Mar 2011, 05:50 UTC reply to this comment

You are still wrong. Firefox 4 beta 12 is the best browser in this planet and its hardware acceleration is also the best. I have practically noticed it in both of my Sony VAIO and SAMSUNG Laptop, both running Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit Original Operating System.


Comment #6 by: Bambang on 10 Mar 2011, 13:54 UTC reply to this comment

very OK


Comment #7 by: MartinL on 12 Mar 2011, 10:27 UTC reply to this comment

I'm sorry, but I really don't get this benchmark, I ran the test in both IE9 and Chrome and came out with chrome on top with 50 elves and 234 presents per min, where as IE9 got 50 elves and 208 presents per min. According to this article IE9 should obliterate chrome in this test... but from where I'm sitting that doesn't appear to be the case. Where that graph got it's results from I really have no idea...


Comment #8 by: Tom on 14 Mar 2011, 17:36 UTC reply to this comment

From my own test I have seen that the results are highly dependent on your pc. Obviously a better pc will give higher results for any given browser, however, it seems that different pcs will also put different browsers on top. For example, on my netbook (Atom N450) IE9 will not allow hardware acceleration (or at least I can't get it to work, which may not be the same thing!) whereas the others do, though it may be a bit limited. Different test, but the 'sing the abcs' demo on the IE9 test site gave interesting results - on Win7, FF4 RC came out on top with a score of 42Seconds, then IE9 RC scoring 51 seconds, and way at the back Chrome 10 with 110 seconds. Conversely, on the same netbook but running Ubuntu Linux, Chrome 10 came out way way ahead, taking only 14 seconds to run the test. My point is that all results of this sort need to be taken with a pinch of salt as you can never guarantee that they'll translate to what the end user will see.


Comment #9 by: Zrumaled on 16 Mar 2011, 02:37 UTC reply to this comment

All i can say is. IE9 dont work in old OS like Windows XP. So Better stick to Firefox and Chrome.


Comment #10 by: Rohit on 23 Mar 2011, 07:50 UTC reply to this comment

Ok..this might sound unbelievable, but I just tried out the test with a new social browser called Rockmelt, which is based on chromium 9. And what I got was 47 elves @294presents/min !! And with chrome 10(latest version), I got only 29 elves!! Can someone please explain what's going on??


Comment #11 by: Tanman on 24 Mar 2011, 00:40 UTC reply to this comment

I also ran this with my Chrome. I scored 50 elves at 390 presents per minute. I think that these results are run rather poorly. My computer is a Prostar with 2.12 GHz and 2 GB RAM. Not exactly great quality. I3 processor too.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM