Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Microsoft > Internet Explorer

August 14th, 2009, 13:11 GMT · By

IE8 Tops Firefox 3, Chrome 2, Opera 10 and Safari 4 with Security Features

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Internet Explorer 8
Enlarge picture
Internet Explorer 8 bests Firefox 3, Chrome 2, Opera 10 and Safari 4 when it comes down to the effectiveness of the security features designed to protect end users against socially engineered malware and phishing. With the advent if IE8, Microsoft kicked up a notch the anti-phishing capabilities that were delivered by Internet Explorer 7, and introduced the SmartScreen Filter. It is precisely the added protection of the SmartScreen Filter that makes IE8 stand out of the crowd in terms of user protection, revealed NSS Labs in studies from February and July 2009.

“NSS Labs has just completed a second round of studies on socially engineered malware attacks, and I’m happy to share the results. In this latest test pass, NSS found a 12% improvement in SmartScreen’s protection levels,” revealed Eric Lawrence, IE PM.

NSS Labs found in the test performed in July 2009 that Internet Explorer 8 RTW stopped no less than 81% out of all attacks involving socially engineered malware, a consistent increase from 69% in February. In fact, IE8 caught 54% more live threats than the runner up Mozilla’s Firefox 3, even though the open-source browser is traditionally perceived as safer than Internet Explorer.

In fact, Firefox’s capacity of stopping socially engineered malware decreased by mid-2009 compared to February. Firefox 3 only blocked 27% of threats in the last month, down 3% from the 30% in February. Next up is Safari, managing to block only 21% of malicious code, also down 3% from the previous study. Chrome only stopped 7% of threats, less than half the percentage at the start of the year. And Opera is in last place, blocking just 1% of socially engineered malware, five times less than the February study.

Mean Block Rate for Socially Engineered Malware
Enlarge picture
Mean Block Rate for Phishing
Enlarge picture
“We’ve spent quite a bit of time talking about the socially engineered malware threat because it is currently the biggest problem users face. However, phishing remains a prevalent and important threat to users as well. We’re continuously making improvements to our data sources and intelligence systems that deliver phishing protection. This continuous investment keeps IE in the market-leading position it established with the release of the Phishing Filter in IE7. Since then, Internet Explorer 7 and 8 have blocked over 125 million phishing attacks,” Lawrence added.

Internet Explorer 8 also grabbed the top spot for protecting users against phishing attacks. Blocking 83% of attacks, IE8 offers the most comprehensive anti-phishing protection, followed closely by Firefox 3 with 80%. Opera 10 stopped 54% of phishing attempts, Chrome 2 just 26% and Safari 4 only 2%.

Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) RTW is available for download here (for 32-bit and 64-bit flavors of Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008).

Firefox for Windows is available here.

The latest development milestone of Google Chrome is available for download here.

Opera 10.0 is available for download here.


7,156 hits · 7 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


IE6 Will Be Kept Alive Despite IE8

Windows 7 E to Die Early

Patch Critical Visual Studio Vulnerabilities

Critical Out-Of-Band Internet Explorer Patches Available

Download Windows 7 IDX and RC IE8 Patch

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Rogerspiere on 14 Aug 2009, 13:49 UTC reply to this comment

Interesting how good is Internet Explorer. A couple years ago it was Firefox the most secure and everybody blamed IE for all mall ware. Now turns out that IE is the best.
Good work M$


Comment #2 by: slaks on 14 Aug 2009, 15:26 UTC reply to this comment

he, he, he......funny, very funny :) IE8 :)


Comment #3 by: jaked122 on 14 Aug 2009, 15:54 UTC reply to this comment

wow, I didn't know microsoft could code apps to be secure


Comment #4 by: ViciouslyCold on 15 Aug 2009, 08:05 UTC reply to this comment

Well this test only means one thing. IE's newest browser is only slightly better than last year's Firefox. Too bad there aren't any tests between IE8 and Firefox 3.5 yet.


Comment #5 by: Myname on 19 Aug 2009, 18:41 UTC reply to this comment

The fact that it's a Microsoft-sponsorised test might be relevant, don't you think ?


Comment #6 by: Jim Bangelducia on 20 Aug 2009, 03:02 UTC reply to this comment

Despite the new protection, it doesn't change the fact that Internet Explorer is the number one targeted browser for malware simply because of its dominant marketshare.

Part of Microsofts inability to post security fixes is simply because of the massive red tape & certification needed that comes with a huge corporation. That said IE8's InPrivate is pretty nice for goofing off at work and the boss not knowing what i'm doing.


Comment #7 by: Arthur on 20 Aug 2009, 14:51 UTC reply to this comment

A cursory read reveals a lot. Firstly the report is commissioned (paid for) by Microsoft. The wording of the NSS report reveals some telling FUD as well, eg. Opera..."a mere" and "no difference" betwee the 9.x and 10.x series.

Then there's this footnote:

Note: This study does not compare browser security related to vulnerabilities in plug‐ins or the browsers themselves.

...what a useful security evaluation for the mass public.

Their previous report was an extremely poor piece of work, and in the end it seems that they were caught by their own contradictions:

http://my.opera.com/haavard/blog/2009/03/26/malware-report-from-nss-labs-manipulates-statistics

As an example, they claimed that Opera 9.63 updated itself to 9.64 during testing, but automatic updates aren't available in Opera 9.

Also, I wonder why they included beta 10 in this test.
I mean on: http://my.opera.com/haavard/blog/2009/03/26/malware-report-from-nss-labs-manipulates-statistics nss made a comment saying:

"We made a conscious decision not to including BETA products (with known bugs and stability issues) in our test as it would have been unfair to the Browsers..." NSStest.

So why did they change that this time around? They used opera 10 beta, so I'm wondering if there is any (valid) reason for it?

I'm just wondering why they suddenly allowed beta software, though they used to think it would be unfair. Okay, they used the release candidate of IE8 back then, but they seem to consider a release candidate a full release otherwise they wouldn't have said:

"By definition, a Release Candidate is published after the BETA test is completed. IE8 RC1 was Microsoft’s FINAL Release Candidate." NSStest.

I'd much rather use the browser I'm using right now instead of fracking Internet Exploder 8(!).

Opera 10 beta 3 (L)

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM