Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Internet Explorer

September 14th, 2009, 14:00 GMT · By

IE8 Tops Firefox 3.5, Chrome 2.0, Opera 10, and Safari 4.0 in Power Consumption

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Internet Explorer 8
Enlarge picture
Power consumption is one aspect of technology where less is indisputably more. Less power consumption is synonymous with cut costs, reduced carbon emissions, and increased battery life. But while surfing the web with a power socket nowhere in sight, energy costs and the carbon footprint might just be the last things on a Windows PC user’s mind. Not the same is valid for battery life. A critical aspect of mobility being the ability to stretch battery life as much as possible, Internet Explorer 8 is apparently the best choice in browsers out of all competitive products when it comes down to eating the less amounts of energy.

AnandTech tested Apple Safari (Build 4.0.3), Google Chrome (Build 2.0.172.43), Firefox (Build 3.5.2), Internet Explorer (Build 8.0.6001.18813), and Opera (Build 9.6.4 and 10 Beta 3) in a measuring contest to see which browser consumes less energy. The conclusions of the study put IE8 firmly in first place, allowing end users to use laptops longer than any of its rivals.

On a Gateway NV52 laptop based on the AMD RS780MN platform, AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-64 (Dual-core, 2.1GHz, 2x512KB L2, 65nm, 35W, 667MHz FSB), with 2x2048MB DDR2-667 RAM, Integrated ATI Radeon HD 3200, 15.6" Glossy LED-Backlit 16:9 WXGA (1366x768), and 320GB 5400RPM, running Windows Vista ("Balanced" profile), IE8 could be used for 175 minutes. On the same machine, Firefox and AdBlock consumed all energy in 168 minutes, Chrome 2 in 162, Firefox 3.5.2 in 161 minutes, Opera 9.64 in 157 minutes, Opera 10.0 beta 3 in 144 minutes and Safari in 4 in 131 minutes.

The next machine used was running an Intel CPU, namely Gateway NV58, with Intel's GM45 + ICH9M chipset, featuring Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 (Dual-core, 2.1GHz, 2MB shared L2, 45nm, 35W, 800MHz FSB), 2x2048MB DDR2-667 RAM, Integrated Intel GMA 4500MHD, 15.6" Glossy LED-Backlit 16:9 WXGA (1366x768) and 320GB 5400RPM. It took Internet Explorer 8 227 minutes to drain the battery completely. Firefox with AdBlock did the same in 22 minutes, Chrome 2 in 218 min., Opera 9.64 in 212 min., Firefox 3.5.2 in 210 min., Opera 10.0 Beta 3 in 201 min., and Safari 4, once again the greatest energy hog, killed the laptop after just 184 min.

For the last computer tested, a netbook was chosen with the following configuration: Intel Atom N270 or N280 (Tested) N280: 1.66GHz, 512KB L2, 45nm, 667FSB, Intel 945GSE + ICH7MU, 1x1024MB DDR2-533 @ 4-4-4-12 Timings, Integrated Intel GMA 950, 10.1" Glossy LED-Backlit ~16:9 WSVGA (1024x600) and 10.1" Glossy LED-Backlit ~16:9 WSVGA (1024x600). This time around, it was Chrome to use less power, and survive for a full 454 minutes. IE8 was a close runner up with 441 minutes; Opera 9.64 came third with 439 minutes. Firefox 3.5.2 depleted the battery in 439 min., Firefox and AdBlock in 438 min., Opera 10.0 Beta 3 in 437 min., and the power hungry Safari 3 in just 332 min.

Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) RTW is available for download here (for 32-bit and 64-bit flavors of Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008).

Firefox 3.5 for Windows is available here.

The latest development milestone of Google Chrome is available for download here.

Opera 9.64 and 10.0 are available for download here.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

6,323 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


New IE8 RTW Releases Scheduled for September 22nd via WSUS

Windows 7 Family Pack Available on 10 Markets Worldwide

Download Google Chrome 4.0.201.1, Forget Chrome 2.0 and 3.0

IE8 Tops Firefox 3, Chrome 2, Opera 10 and Safari 4 with Security Features

IE6 Will Be Kept Alive Despite IE8

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Neville on 14 Sep 2009, 16:43 UTC reply to this comment

Without considering browser speeds, this information is all but worthless. It is usually not clock time that one wants to extend, instead it is amount accomplished. If one browser is 20% slower but consumes 5% less battery life, I've gotten less done, not more.

In my experience IE is the slowest browser, while Firefox and Chrome are usually about 10-20% faster, and as much as 60-80% faster with JavaScript-intensive pages.


Comment #2 by: mc on 15 Sep 2009, 09:42 UTC reply to this comment

IE it's 2-3 times slower than other browsers, how does it help you when the battery lasts 5 min longer at the price of doing only half the work?

The battery lasts 5-10 mlonger but you wait something like 30 min more for pages to load/display. Great choice, a la Micro$oft. You waist 30 min but you keep the laptop running for 10 more minutes.


Comment #3 by: fencemeister717 on 17 Sep 2009, 01:25 UTC reply to this comment

i cant speak much for laptops but the statements made are totally false on my Pentium II with a measly 384mb of ram! in fact IE8 uses the most ram and takes the most time to load with safari 4 in a close second. followed by FF 3.5 then Google chrome. I find Opera 9.64 and 10 are very close to the numeral uno speedster on my system. which is none other that K-Meleon. Oh did i mention i use xp with sp1? several friends have told me my xp comp loads pages faster than their vista piles of rumble. in fact a few of them have upgrade back to xp after using my vintage 1997 beast. Personally I dont know how you came to these conclusions otehr than trying to sway a newbie one way or another. suprisingly it seems alot of others agree with me so im lead to believe this comparison is nothing more that propaganda BS!

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM