Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nano-Biotechnology

May 29th, 2007, 10:21 GMT · By Stefan Anitei

How to Track Down the Source of S**t Bacteria Contaminating the Waters

SHARE:

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
Fecal bacteria can get into the watersheds from various sources, such as the wastewater treatment outfalls, and diffuse sources like runoff from fields where livestock waste has been employed for fertilization.

Finding the source of the bacteria pollution is necessary to apply appropriate control practices to reach the water-quality standards required by the Clean Water Act.

But
identifying the source of the fecal contamination can be quite tricky. Microorganisms could help and by employing multiple methods, researchers have been able to track down the origin of fecal pollution in streams, with a significantly higher certainty than with a single method.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) team made its research within the Plum Creek watershed in south-central Nebraska. High levels of fecal bacteria turned about 60 % of Nebraska streams impaired by federal and state environmental laws in 2004.

In a 2001 monitoring made by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality revealed Plum Creek as the most contaminated tributary to the middle reaches of the Platte River. Two fecal source-tracking tools were employed for the contaminated water and stream-sediment samples were collected from the Plum Creek watershed. The DNA of the bacteria collected in water and sediment samples were compared to the DNA of bacteria from known fecal sources, or by focusing on a "marker" within the DNA linked to a specific fecal source.

The research detected cattle and wildlife as the main sources of fecal bacteria responsible for the water contamination in the area. "While the two methods led to similar overall interpretations, using both methods together gave us a clearer picture of potential sources and the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used," said lead author USGS Hydrologist Jason Vogel. "Additionally, results from bacteria found in stream-bottom sediment also suggest that different tools for tracking fecal contamination may have varying relevance to the more specific goal of tracking the sources of E. coli in water or soil within the watershed."

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,234 hits · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Vulnerability to Drugs Is Genetic

How Speedy Is Bacterial Sex?

Hell Bacteria Eating Heavy Oil And Natural Asphalt

Your Gut Bacteria Makes You Fat, Diabetic, Fatty Livered and Full of Bad Cholesterol

Nanotechnology Delivers Stronger Anti-Cavity Tooth Filling

READER COMMENTS:



No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion!
Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM