Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Science > History

December 22nd, 2005, 15:49 GMT · By Vlad Tarko

How did fish grow legs?

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

The fossils found in the last 15 years allow a much more detailed perspective on how did our first ancestors that ventured out of the water evolve. Once all the discovered pieces of the puzzle are fit together, a synthesis carried out by Jennifer A. Clack in her Scientific American paper 'Getting a Leg Up on Land', a new image is developed. This image is considerably different from the one biologists held until recently.

Going back 15 years ago, only two relevant fossils were discovered: one of a fish and one of a tetrapod. But the answer to the question "how did the fish evolve into the tetrapod?" was left to pure speculation.

The most popular such speculation was done in the '50s by the Harvard paleontologist Alfred Sherwood Romer and maintained that during a drought fish living in small water puddles were forced to go from one puddle to another. In order to do such a thing they had to pass certain short distances on dry land. Gradually, these distances grew, and legs were an adaptation that helped the fish going from one puddle to another. In other words, the theory said that the fish got out of the water and only afterwards it developed legs and eventually the capacity to breath out of the water.
The discovered fossils offer a relatively detailed picture of a 20 million years period during which terrestrial tetrapods evolved from fish.
However, this picture does not support Romer's therory.

First of all, it seems that fish grew legs long before they got out of the water. A first clue in this direction was offered by the fossil of an animal which although having legs most certainly couldn't use them to support its weight on the ground or to walk with them (in the image below you can see the transition - the lowest animal is the most primitive). In other words, if those legs were of any use at all, they certainly weren't useful for walking. But what were they useful for?
The answer to this question came from a somewhat neglected direction: the issue of fingers. When they first appeared, what were fingers used for, what kind of advantage did a fish with legs and fingers have over its colleagues? The researchers have discovered that initially the aquatic tetrapods had eight fingers and not five, as all of us "modern" tetrapods. The transition from eight to five fingers is clearly supported by fossil evidences.
This transition was probably determined precisely by the transition in the role of legs: when legs began to be used for walking the coordination of eight fingers was difficult and energy consuming; thus our ancestors gradually lost some fingers until only five of them remained. When the tetrapods were still aquatic, the legs and fingers played a different role, a much more passive role. An entirely surprising role: they were helping the fish to keep its head out of the water in order to breathe the air!

That is the fish not only developed their legs while still being in water but they also developed the capacity of breathing air while still in water. This seems incredible: as Clack wrote, "why, after millions of years of successfully breathing underwater, did some fish begin turning to the air for their oxygen?"

One clue comes from the climatologists. Dating the fossils we can tell when those animals have lived, and the climatologists can tell us how the climate was back then. During the time when these fish "decided" to grow their legs and started breathing air, during the Devonian, the climate was very hot. It is also known that, and this is no accident, is the same period plants had a spectacular growth both on land and in water. We can imagine how the environment of those fishes has changed: the plants grew and became luxuriant; while the small fish liked this, the big ones were not enjoying it at all. Moreover, and maybe most importantly, warm water retains less oxygen than cool water and thus the big fish have found themselves suffocating in the new environment. They didn't have much choice: they either died out or learned how to breathe air.
Thus, it isn't an accident that all the first terrestrial tetrapods were carnivorous - this was deduced from the shape of their jaws.

What one gets is a fascinating evolutionary image, completely different from the previous one. Until recently the primitive tetrapods were considered some un-adapted animals that weren't fit either for land or water. Now it is clear that they were adapted to the aquatic life of their own time. Meanwhile the times have changed, but they have reached land and their adaptations for the aquatic life during the Devonian have found new uses for the life on land.

All these fossil evidences have now been interpreted and synthesized into a new image that has helped scientists unravel the details of the transition from fish to four-legged animals. Furthermore, they allowed establishing more precisely the moment when tetrapods had appeared: around 380-375 millions years ago, in the late Middle Devonian.

Update: The Missing Link Between Fish and Four-Legged Land Animals Was Found



27,722 hits · 12 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: truth7seeker on 25 Jan 2006, 16:44 UTC reply to this comment

Is that picture c, with the fingers a real species. What is the name of it? I would like to look at pictures of it.

Comment #1.1 by: vlad.tarko on 25 Jan 2006, 21:58 GMT

It's Acanthostega.

It also makes a guest appearence here: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Did-our-ancestors-breathe-through-their-ears-16611.shtml


Comment #2 by: rocky on 26 Feb 2008, 04:17 UTC reply to this comment

thank for helping me for researching the tetrapods on how they evolved


Comment #3 by: Steve on 26 Sep 2008, 01:23 UTC reply to this comment

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

The scientific evidence backs this up. What you have is pseudo-science. It is ridiculous to think that fish evolved to land animals when the proof of this would require hundreds to thousands or more transitional forms and you are talking about 2.

Fossils are from the global flood when God judged the earth because of man's sin. He will judge yours too, especially for rejecting him unless you come to him for mercy. John 3:18 John 6:37 "Him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out." It is good to know that our creator is still very gracious.


Comment #4 by: robert on 01 Oct 2008, 08:01 UTC reply to this comment

Are you serious? what "scientific evidence" backs you up? Your a psycho religious maniac who thinks that leprechauns and jesus are real, get a life dude.

Comment #4.1 by: lisam on 02 Feb 2009, 21:39 GMT

If the fish had to learn to breathe oxygen to adapt to these new conditions, how quickly did they learn to breathe? I thought evolution like this would have to take years - wouldn't they have died before they had chance to adapt?

p.s. I don't agree with Steve's theory on fossils, but there is more evidence for Jesus' life than there are is for fish turning into land animals - check it out for yourself!


Comment #5 by: D.J. Mac on 04 Aug 2009, 20:12 UTC reply to this comment

I have a question. How were the legs and fingers used to hold up the head? The limbs in the pictures provided look too short even reach the head, let alone support it.

Comment #5.1 by: nobbody on 21 Oct 2009, 15:29 GMT

Limbs dont support the head. It supports the body. The body supports the head. And it's the muscles that help it stayup. "Oh my a snake doesnt have limbs but it can lift its head. Its impossible. LOL"


Comment #6 by: gorge lopez on 14 Oct 2010, 03:32 UTC reply to this comment

Its like that because its combinated with a cocodrile


Comment #7 by: Stephen@CV on 25 Apr 2012, 09:59 UTC reply to this comment

I've seen fish out of water. They don't grow legs and develop lungs. They die. Quite quickly. This article sounds like a collection of fairy stories to me.

Comment #7.1 by: realdeal on 28 Apr 2012, 01:50 GMT

wow!! who is this genius???

#1) why are you watching fish die? put the fish back in the water? or kill it quickly if you need to eat it?

#2) evolution takes millions of years to be realized. but i don't expect you to comprehend this, as apparently you like to stand around and watch fish suffocate.

I have a theory that I invite you to entertain. Do not believe it and do not discredit it, just entertain the thought. Insects, fish etc. are not capable of thinking critically. Humans are self aware, sapient. As such, humans are capable of directly, and knowingly, changing the ecosystem. We do not necessarily have the foresight to comprehend the repercussions waiting, but i guarantee you we have the mind power and willingness to solve whatever problem at hand to continue the species. This is not an advantage or disadvantage over insects, fish, etc., but merely a different approach in life.

Why do people from Kenya run so fast? Why are American's so fat? Without the blessing (or curse) of electricity, the steam engine, etc., would Americans be a little leaner or faster? maybe taller? or is it shorter?

My point is, we are all part of the ecosystem. Before critical thinking, living beings were subject to mother nature. If mother nature changed, the living being adapted.

To put this in fish-killer terms, when our fossil fuel waste / greenhouse gases take their toll, will humans survive? of course. it might be through invention (new technology that rids of waste) and it might be through adaptation (our bodies being able to cope), but it will probably be a combination of both.

I will leave you with this...

If you believe that living creatures do not adapt to the environment they helped create, you probably stand around with a blank stare on your face as you watch fish die.

Comment #7.2 by: Smoley on 17 May 2012, 02:42 GMT

The fish were suffocating in the water so they stuck their heads out of the water to get air.

It was either die out or learn to breath air!
That's right, learn to breath air through the gills.

If global warming is going to cause the ice caps to melt and flood the earth, then humans will just have to stick their heads in the water and learn to breath water.

Evolution is so simple.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM