Scientists' opinions are very divided

Dec 14, 2006 10:47 GMT  ·  By

The severity of the next sunspot cycle, which could produce powerful solar storms that can disrupt communication systems on Earth, worries the scientific community.

Space weather forecasts have varied widely in how intense the next solar cycle will be; predictions for the peak sunspot number range from 42 to 185. A group - ran by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and funded by NASA - aims to sift them to achieve an official prediction in the spring of 2007.

While scientists observed dark, cool sunspots on the sun's surface since the days of Galileo, they've been unable to accurately forecast the severity of the eruptions associated with the spots, which are best known for triggering solar flares. "The debate over the next cycle, known as solar cycle 24, has been passionate" said Douglas Biesecker, a physicist at NOAA's Space Environment Center. "No clear prediction has emerged yet from the various computer models that simulate the sun's activity", said Biesecker. "You have scientists who each have their own idea of what the cycle is going to be and everybody believes they're right".

Governments and companies increasingly need space weather forecasts to guard against possible failures of power grids and radio communications when solar storms explode with massive bursts of magnetic energy and radiation that barrel toward Earth at millions of miles per hour. Solar activity happens when the sun's magnetic field lines twist and turn as it rotates. Millions of tons of superheated charged particles will be thrown into space.

Researchers at the National Center for Atmospheric Research predicted that solar cycle 24 will be between 30 % and 50 % stronger than the current one and will begin a year later, basing their forecast on a sophisticated computer model that others contend has not yet been proven reliable.

"The intensity of the next sunspot cycle could have consequences for the aging Hubble Space Telescope, which has beamed back stunning images of star births and galaxies," said Dean Pesnell, a project scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, who thinks the solar cycle will be weak.

"A weak cycle would mean that Hubble would experience less atmospheric drag and stay in orbit longer while a strong cycle could force NASA to boost the telescope so that it stays in place," Pesnell said.

David Hathaway, a researcher at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center who predicts a strong sunspot cycle, said the biggest hurdle is trying to forecast how the sun will act with little data to work with. "It's like listening to a freight train in the distance to estimate the size of the train," Hathaway said.