NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > How to

How to


How Did The Vikings Discover America?

The first discovery of America

By Stefan Anitei, Science Editor

20th of March 2007, 15:11 GMT

Adjust text size:


Statue of Leif Eriksson
Enlarge picture
Who discovered America? When Columbus returned from the Antilles in 1493, he was not the first European to have stepped in the New World.

It seems that, 500 years before, a group of blond Scandinavians had done it. It happened during the Viking era, when these sailors and warriors were roaming northern Africa, eastern Europe and the Middle East.

In 986, Bjarni Herjolfsson, experimented navigator and adventurer, left Norway to reach Iceland close to the winter. He found that his father had left as part of a fleet led by Erik the Red to colonize a huge land situated to the West and attractively named "Greenland."

So, he set out to Greenland, but he lost his way due to the wind and fog for many days. When he finally spotted land, it was very different from the description of Greenland: it was a land of hills and mighty forests. But, after a few days, the landscape turned more mountainous and glacial and, departing to the East, he found Greenland and Erik's colony.

These people did not land in North America, but they were the first to make it out. One of Erik's sons got very interested in the story told by Bjarni, especially as, in the frozen Greenland, wood was hard to come by, while Bjarni was telling of a forested country.
Around 1000, Leif Eriksson took Bjarni's boat and, together with 35 men, left in search of the land spotted by him.

Leif first met the Baffin Island (in today's northeastern Canada), covered by glaciers and without pastures. Going southwards, they found a forested plain, with beaches of white sand they named Marklandia (The Forested Land), in today's Labrador. A few days later, the Vikings found an even better territory.

They built houses there and wintered in that territory. One man discovered vines and the land was named Vinlandia (The Wine Land). In spring, they returned to Greenland with the cellars filled with products from the area.

Reconstruction of viking houses in L'Anse Aux Meadows
Enlarge picture
Until today, all these lands have remained a mystery. In the 60s and 70s, in the surroundings of the L'Anse Aux Meadows village (Newfoundland), archaeologists found the ruins of some houses with distinguishable northern features, like an iron founding oven and other objects dated from the year 1000.

In the 90s, a Danish researcher found in southern Newfoundland a well-polished stone piece coming from a Viking craft. Leif recounted his journey to the Norwegian king.

In 1070, the German historian Adam of Bremen traveled to Denmark to collect information about northern countries, and the Danish king Sweyn told him about Vinlandia and its excellent wine.

Viking colons
Enlarge picture
Through the Chronicle of Bremen, many erudite people learned about the western lands. The Icelandic chronicles from the XII-XIV centuries mention other journeys made from Greenland to Markland and Vinlandia. It is possible that Columbus knew about all this, and some say he visited Iceland before his journeys to the Americas.

The puzzle that remains to be solved is why the Vikings didn't remain definitively in America. Maybe they tried to, but were unsuccessful, due to the difficult conditions and the "skraelings" (Native Americans), whose forces were superior to theirs.

The houses at L'Anse Aux Meadows harbored no more than 500 people, and this number was enough for an uninhabited zone, not for one where they had to face Indians. How could they face an Iroquois unit, when French and British troops, armed with fire guns, had problems with them 700-800 years later?

On the other hand, the Greenland colony faced huge problems: the climate got colder (the Medieval "Little Ice Age"), the colons could no longer make agriculture and sustain themselves and they completely vanished: the last sign of them dates back to a wedding from 1408.

TAGS:

viking | America | sail | Greenland | Vinlandia
Read by 41,016 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.6/5) 26 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2010 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


New Viking Finds

Roman Coins from Ancient Netherlands

An 8th Century Ship Found in the Mediterranean

Pre-Columbian Indians Purchased Women By War

Vikings Used Sunstone Crystals to Sail Through Fog

The Largest Shipwrecked Roman Vessel from Mediterranean

How Did the Vikings Sail?

The First Americans Reached the Continents by Boats Along the Pacific Coast, 15,000 Years Ago

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Scott Sterrett on 08 Feb 2008, 02:45 GMT reply to this comment

I believe that the Vikings were in fact the first to find America. The key word is Discover for the native Americans did not discover America, they more or less just lived there. Also the Vikings were not very bright and named things very obviously, so why would they call the new land Newfound Land if it was inhabited by people, it would not be new.

Comment #1.1 by: Diou on 24 Jan 2010, 16:10 GMT

America was discovered by native americans who come from Mongols or the Inuit. It was the Mongols and native southeast asians that inhabited most of the old world from the Pacific to America all the way to Northern Europe and Asia. Their DNA and physical appearance testifies to that fact. Therefore, native americans would most certainly have been the first to discover America. They did not just appear from out of the ground. Evolutionists and Creationists alike believe that we all came from the same geographical place. So the native americans had to discover the place before they lived in it dont you think?


Comment #2 by: Arild Aarskog/Norway on 30 Dec 2008, 18:18 GMT reply to this comment

Very good article.

The Vikings discovered America in year 1000 and before Columbus in 1492.
There are very detailed description of this event if you can read the original documentation. Also findings of Viking items in America has verified this.

The Iceland chronicles from the centuries XII-XIV mention other journeys made from Greenland to Markland and Vinlandia.

As mentioned in the article: It is possible that Columbus knew about all this, and some say he visited Iceland before his journeys to the Americas.

As we know Columbus got money from the Queen of Spain in Granada to go on his journey
I have seen one painting of him in a Spanish Newspaper(this should be the only original painting where they believe this is how he looked like). What stuck me was that he looked like a man from Scandinavia. He looked like a Viking, so it is not unlikely that his family/father/grandfather etc told him about some land to the West....
Not proven, but some claims that Columbus came from Nordfjord in Norway.
His name was Kristoffer Bonde.

By the way and not linked directly to the discovery of America: York in England is originally a Norse/Viking word and is Jorvik in Norse or Norwegian. So New York is then a real Viking name. I think all Americans should be aware of this.

Comment #2.1 by: Vedil on 23 Feb 2009, 12:21 GMT

Arild Aarskog:
"By the way and not linked directly to the discovery of America: York in England is originally a Norse/Viking word and is Jorvik in Norse or Norwegian. So New York is then a real Viking name. I think all Americans should be aware of this"

###############

NOT TRUE, THE NAME YORK, COMES FROM "IORC" IN GAELIC LANGUAGE. IORK, WHICH IS A SPECIES TREE.


Comment #3 by: Li on 04 Mar 2009, 14:13 GMT reply to this comment

The first who went to America were Illyrians.


Comment #4 by: nordfjord on 07 Apr 2009, 13:28 GMT reply to this comment

cool, i am from nordfjord, and i dident know that! ist cool if its true !


Comment #5 by: Donna on 29 Apr 2009, 00:57 GMT reply to this comment

I think the Vikings were already in the Americas, when the land was still connected. When the land separated into the present continents evidence of their residence still remained. Rock on the Eastern shores of America are the same as rocks found in Eastern Western Europe. Vikings were living in America when the land was one piece.


Comment #6 by: Nikolaj/Denmark on 08 May 2009, 12:36 GMT reply to this comment

Well it's pretty much proved that the Norse Vikings discovered America, but do anyone know how many times they could have visited the area?


Comment #7 by: Ken on 21 Sep 2009, 00:24 GMT reply to this comment

I DISCOVERED AMERICA!!! :P JK
In any event i wanna ask all of you something... How can discover a place with people already on it?


Comment #8 by: bob on 26 Oct 2009, 18:01 GMT reply to this comment

this information was very useful.


Comment #9 by: Kristian on 10 Nov 2009, 13:26 GMT reply to this comment

here's a link: http://www.millersville.edu/~columbus/data/art/CCNORWAY.ART

Several historians now agree on the fact that Columbus was Norwegian. Family escaped from Nordfjord in the late 1400's. His physical frame, blonde hair, blue eyes, size, he never really learned Spanish, nor Italian but communicated well with Icelanders and he was a proper sailor. As well he described himself as a foreigner, "a man of the sea", sounds like a Norwegian, huh?

Comment #9.1 by: Incredulous on 31 Dec 2009, 02:21 GMT

I can't understand where you get your "information" from Kristian?
Christopher Columbus spoke both Italian AND Spanish. Although his origins are still a matter of contention among historians. It is known that he AT LEAST lived in Genoa from a very early age. also that he (understandably) spoke AND wrote in Italian(with a Catalan style). Not only that but one would have to be supremely gullible to believe that an admiral in the Spanish navy would not speak Spanish! Not to mention he spent the majority of his life there. Also, the indigenous people of north Italy are tall with blond hair and blue eyes(my fathers side of the family are from the north and i am 6'3" with blue eyes and blonde hair and my father is 6' with blue eyes blonde hair etc..). Then you have the fact that Spain had a formidable navy(Spanish armada etc) and were extremely competent seafarers. Just because his coat of arms was similar to a Norwegian families coat of arms (btw they fled Norway in the 15th century)and he described himself as "a man of the sea" DOES NOT make him sound like he's Norwegian! lol! Also your statement of:-"several historians now agree on the fact that he was Norwegian" is simply a bare-faced lie. One Norwegian; Tor Borch Sannes has merely SPECULATED that Columbus was Norwegian because of the similarity in the coat of arms. Now, I am NOT trying to say that he was Spanish, Italian, Greek, English, Jewish or Norwegian(although out of all of them the Norwegian theory has the LEAST to substantiate it) as i don't much care where he came from. Where he came from i don't think will EVER be proven(too many people want a piece of that pie.myself, i find MANY of his deeds to of been incredibly cruel and abhorrent.i would even go so far as to say, evil.) but you should not write such unsubstantiated and quite frankly laughable suppositions as if they are facts. That is simply wrong and misleading.


Comment #10 by: incredulous on 31 Dec 2009, 00:33 GMT reply to this comment

Very interesting article, but your written English is appalling.There are spelling mistakes throughout. Practically every other word there are extra/missing words. For an educational piece written by a science "editor" this is simply inexcusable sir. The people that wrote responses to it can be forgiven for their poor English, bless them. The article itself though needs/deserves at least a modicum of grammatical correctness. For if an "educational" piece like this is to be written in "English", write it in English. This is why children these days are so infuriatingly ignorant of the written word. If you need any proof, have someone correct your text and you will see the same mistakes in the peoples responses to your article where they have quoted you. You have a certain responsibility to the readers of your piece as it is taken as being educational, ergo, correct.

Comment #10.1 by: Sorin on 04 Jan 2010, 10:28 GMT

The article has been revised completely. Thanks for reporting this.


Comment #11 by: Nick on 03 Jan 2010, 17:30 GMT reply to this comment

Wow, you are dumb. The continents werent in one piece, allegedly, until millions of years ago. There is no way in the year 1000 North America and Europe were connected.

You need an education.


Comment #12 by: john on 04 Jan 2010, 00:46 GMT reply to this comment

Since it is generaly accepted that humans did not originate in North America but migrated there, it would be whichever tribe first arrived in North America that discovered it technically speaking. Wether that would be Native Americans or not, they would have still discovered it before the Vikings.


Comment #13 by: tray on 27 Jan 2010, 02:09 GMT reply to this comment

not true, approximately 20,000 years ago the first people to come to the new land were
from Asia, they were the first native Americans to come over a land bridge between Asia
and North American.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM