Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Editorials

March 10th, 2007, 13:20 GMT · By Stefan Anitei

How Did Religion and Atheism Evolve?

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Different philosophies, atheism and religion may impose different ways of life or not, as there are intermediary shades, because in most cases, there is no perfectly homogeneous religiosity or atheism.

Faithful people can be from bigots to those who do not practice any rite or cult accessories, but they do believe in an impersonal divine abstraction (deists, pantheists and so on), as also amongst atheists there are various hues, from rationalist atheists, which is more profound, to sentimental atheists, which can be sincere, but without any logical or scientific argumentation.

These two philosophies shaped along the history the way we see the world and existence, and had a deep social and educative impact.

But a complete education cannot reject the study of a comparative history of the religions, nor experimental sciences or evolution.

The religious man is a person which feels he/she must believe in something supernatural, in a colossal power which is situated over himself/herself and which cannot be detected, nor defined, as it seems impersonal, even if he/she individualizes it in a specific form, sometimes personifiable, from stone (lithomorphism) to tree (dendromorphism), animal (zoomorphism) and human shape (anthropomorphism), like ancient Greek gods.

In a certain philosophical state, this man is pushed towards the abstractness of the object of his/her faith (to God, Allah or Buddha).

The divinity type was fixed in parameters
accessible to all religious people by theologists, and the believer accepts passively the dogma; he/she just needs the divinity as appeal instance, before death or after death, for injustices or failures to which he/she considers is subjected by people, phenomena or situations.

The religious person cannot be constant, as he/she may experience moments of doubt or revolt, but his/her general structure won't allow it a total gate, the religion abandonment, unless in extremely rare cases.

The believer is an irrational; he/she may mimic ration, accidentally and a mystic stage, whose inner mechanism is a total loss of self in the ecstatic way.

According to the practiced religion and local traditions, the faith is the motivation and goal of each religious system and has an affective root, to which dogmas, holly books and mythological tradition become integrally accepted formulas, a spontaneous act of pure option without logical control.

Admitting without reserves and critics a mystical-mythological information, any believer will reject any other source of knowledge than divine revelation, sometimes completed (like in many fanatic sects) by illumination through grace.

Religion is a mystical refuge in a transcendent system that became a tool of explaining the unknown, the inexplicable at a given moment.

Even in inferior mytho-religious states (animatism, animism, demonology, fetishism and totemism), the cave men or those of the archaic civilizations tried to explain the environment, vegetation, animals, stars, light and heat or essential phenomena (life, death), their destiny and that of the world; religion became a report between human and Universe.

The administrative, clerical organization of the religion established a set of rewards and punishments, generally posthumously, becoming an instrument of population molding.

In this stage, religion is dominant in the society, not necessarily theocratic, like ancient Israel or Tibet, like medieval Catholic and Islamic states.

In those cases, religion settled a social inequality in the name of the equality of all people in the face of divine justice and a deep resignation with the life and faith, because of the post-death reward (the "virgins rewards in paradise" for the Muslim suicidals sounds familiar?).

The current religious people experience, facing the informational and technological boom, a feeling of resignation and alienation.

Even in the oldest cultural forms, notions existed indicating a stage of disbelief.

Protagoras, in the fifth century BC, is the first real atheist philosopher; he said gods do not exist, in existence or mind, and that ancient people turned in gods all useful things to life, like sun, moon or rivers.

Even the Bible signals the existence of atheists during David's times.

Amongst other examples, in Psalm X: " The godless says in his proud: "His anger does not follow me. There is no God!" So are all his thoughts. Every path he goes is all right".

Greek philosopher Antiphon reached the conclusion there is only the real world, auto-existent.

Atheism starts with the doubt; certain affective states fuel the skepticism.

But only rationality can bring an argument.
From the first decades of the XXth century, atheism became a massive phenomenon, devoid of sentimentalism, manifesting a complete refusal of religious attitude going to the rejection of any religion.

The current atheism is intensively fueled, wittingly or not, by science and technology.

The atheism of the last decades of the XIXth century was rather a sentimental one, fueled by a scientific enough that made some believe that, before the discovery of the radioactivity and quantum physics, physics had given everything.

An atheist rejecting sentimentally the religion, without the base of an information is a bigot atheist, similar to the religious bigot.

Cause atheism is a global philosophical doctrine, based on rational rejection, based on the information delivered by experimental sciences, of the divinity and the supernatural domain, mythic and mystic.
FILED UNDER:
God
religion
atheism
spiritual

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

6,767 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


... Turn Zombie

A 4,000 Years Old Mud Tomb, Near the Egyptian Stepe Pyramid

72 % of the Americans Are Illiterate

The Oldest Magic Spell against Snakes

Statues from Ancient Greece before Troy War

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Jonathan01 on 11 May 2007, 05:16 UTC reply to this comment

Athiesm is perhaps the biggest conceit ever create by the mind of men, and it shows just how badly we suffer from the belief that we are somehow "important" in the scheme of the universe.

Athiesm is an absolute yes/no conclusion. There are no shades of gray, an therein lies the utter idiocy behind it.

Every day we learn in some way or another just how paltry our knowledge of this world is, and as a result of that realization understand that our knowledge of the universe in totality is as close to zero as one can get. (relative to what is that we don't know of)

It is a mystery to advanced science what is on the surface of the majority of this planet (think of oceans).

Yet knowing so little, there are those who say without doubt there is no G-d.

Now I don't mean the petty lords of modern religion, but an entity best described by Einstein, a man who many athiests believe was one of them, but in truth his words describe a vastness beyond our ken that IS (not was or a nothing) responsible for the universe. A vastness so beyond our ability to comprehend, that any attempt beyond acknowledgment would be a mistake.

Whether you go from the very smallest elementary particles, clearly non-living as we define life, up to the scale of galaxtic groups, patterns repeat over and over. The same pattern exists on all levels.

A simple example is the globe, it is the shape of the proton, nuetron, the atom and so on up to the planets, stars, and even galaxies, though astronomers don't show them, because the essence is is dark matter, something yet to be proven, but if included, the "shape" of a galaxy is a globe.

More complex patterns also repeat, for example the simple /- electrical charge behind molecular attraction, is also the key to life. For it is the negative and positive charges that living cells utilize to 'breath" to live. Nuetralize the electrical charge and death results.

Scale it up to multi-cellular creatures, and the basic pattern rules the entire being, each cell in our body depends on that simple pattern, but it's stitched together so we cannot see it, and most cannot comprehend, that our life depends on such a simple thing.

Even more confounding to most is the notion that "intelligence" is that simple negative/positive principal scaled up many times (the concept of 1 and 0)

At some scale that pattern, becomes the basis for intelligence, self-awareness. We are not the only ones who are intelligent in this world, even though we may be the brightest.

For many the pattern stops there, but does it? Why should it?

Well if the universe is any guide, it does not.

What prevents us from comprehending our limitations is ironically our collective belief that we would be able to comprehend something so much grander than ourselves.

Why should we be able to comprehend this, any more than a bacterium can comprehend what we are as it sits on our skin - its own personal universe?

The electrical pattern in our brains generate a magnetic field, an oddity that science has known for decades. Yet because of the 'rational" nature of science few speculate or try to place this in any sort of "pattern."

If they did, it quickly becomes clear, that a magnetic field can be a product of "life." It sure is on earth, virtually every livin thing generates one.

This being the case, to look for intelligence/life beyond our ken, it makes sense to look for patterns in magnetic fields, that vaguely resemble the ones generated by our own minds (when you think about it the line in the bible "and man was created in the image of G-d" can actually make some rational sense.

This direction hasn't been pursued, but the mere fact that patterns repeat endlessly in our universe, means almost nothing is unique.

Look long enough and you'll see no matter how unique something is it is part of a pattern/continueum from past to present to future, from microscopic to galactic.

Intelligence/awareness is no different. We are not unique in any way.

Yet Athiesm by declaring there is no G-d inadvertently also decides that in this one instance the unverse breaks its own pattern for all things.

For some reason it decided humans were the only uniquely intelligent creatures. I really doubt it.

More than likely if we could look up, and were able to see, we'd see vast streams of energy tracing the thoughts and mind and spirit of the entity Einstein described.

However even if we could it would still take a lot of effort to comprehend the connection, just as it would take a lot of effort for a bacterium to understand it's connection to a human being in the overall scheme of things.

No one has to believe in religion, but no one can honestly say there is no such thing as G-d in the absolute sense.

Knowing that would require vast knowledge that is beyond the combined ability of all mankind.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM