Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nature

May 18th, 2010, 08:59 GMT · By

Heatwaves in Europe to Slam the Mediterranean Coast

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Snapshot from the computer model that the team used for the new study
Enlarge picture
As global warming and climate change make their effects felt more and more, researchers are beginning to collect enough data to predict which areas of the world will suffer most. In such a study, investigators determined that the Mediterranean Basin, surrounding the sea of the same name, will suffer extensively at the “hands” of heatwaves. These phenomena, relatively rare centuries ago, are now taking place with increased frequency, due to the fact that the regular workings of the atmosphere are being disturbed by increased temperatures and excessive pollution, Nature News reports.

“Low-lying humid plains, such as around the River Po in northern Italy, and coastal cities such as Athens, Rome and Marseilles, are likely to be more severely affected by dangerous heat conditions than higher and drier inland regions,” explains Erich Fischer. The scientist, who is based at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich, conducted the work with colleague Christoph Schar. The team based its analysis on datasets obtained from global and regional climate models, which they studied extensively. The goal of their project was to predict changes that may occur in the frequency and duration of summer heatwaves, for the next nine decades.

The scientists did not use the worst-case-scenario models, but rather a middle-of-the-road approach, in which some mitigation measures were included, but pollution continued to increase. Their simulation also accounted for projected economic growth, given the fact that the state of the economy generally dictates the length governments are willing to go to mitigate the effects of global warming. If there is no money, then it's highly unlikely that authorities will take money away from essential sectors to promote clean energy and CCS technologies. In the study, the investigators also sought to determine what impact the heatwaves will have on human health.

In a paper they published in this week's issue of the esteemed scientific journal Nature Geoscience, Fischer and Schar say that cramps, exhaustion, heat stroke and death are some of the most common results of exposure to heat and high humidity. They support their argument by highlighting the fact that the massive heatwave that struck Europe in 2003 made more than $16 billion in damages, and killed an estimated 70,000 people. The reason why citizens living around the Mediterranean Sea will be most affected is the fact that they will be exposed to the combined actions of both heat and humidity. When the air is dry, the human body can withstand high temperatures, but add humidity, and you're set for disaster.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

852 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Vegetation Found to Be Contributing to Global Warming

Global Warming Will Kill Off 20 Percent of All Lizards

Source for Past Global Warming Event Found

Experts Formulate Strategy Against Global Warming

Antarctica Had Warmest Year on Record in 2009

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Meme Mine on 18 May 2010, 09:23 UTC reply to this comment

Would resulting cooling disprove predicted warming?
And how is correlation supposed to be considered science? -that would be superstition, as in believing what one does not understand.
And isn't making a virtue out of no proof really just religion?
Why do these Greenzi Climate Change Cowards wish for this misery to happen?
Is promising death for another 24 years sustainable?
Do voters have the real consensus that the taxes and personal sacrifice of lifestyle needs to be enacted into law?
Who dictates public science policy, scientists or voters?
How is bowing to a fat American politician promising to lower the seas considered responsible environmentalism?
How many climate change scientists to change a light bulb? None, but they DO have consensus that it WILL change.
Why are there more consensus scientists than marching protestors?
Why did the global warmer cross the road? She was being chased by a UFO, a swarm of Killer Bees and a new generation of children fed up with having death threats issued to them for 24 years.
Why is the climate crisis hiding only in far off places like the poles, deep in the oceans, high atop mountains and in remote jungles?
Is all good weather now bad and all bad weather just “wrong”?
Since we don’t natural climate, (wouldn’t that be a special place) how can we differentiate between it and “man-made” climate? Like how would you tell the difference between each if both actually exist? Wouldn’t man-made climate therefore NOT exist?
Why are peace loving environmentalists not overjoyed at Climate Gate proving the dangers has passed and was a mistake?
Why is fear environMENTALism’s only motivator?

Comment #1.1 by: Tudor Vieru on 18 May 2010, 10:37 GMT

"Who dictates public science policy, scientists or voters?"
Scientists are best informed, and they are also voters. Why train to do a job, if you can't do it because of political interests?

"Why is the climate crisis hiding only in far off places like the poles, deep in the oceans, high atop mountains and in remote jungles?"
These are the most vulnerable locations, and also the most likely to suffer. You can see for yourself by going there. You cannot disporve everything simply because you can't convince yourself? Have you ever seen an atom? Could it be that it doesn't exist? No, it exists, you just cannot see it without the righ equipment. Go to Antarctica, and you'll discover missing glaciers.

"Since we don’t natural climate, (wouldn’t that be a special place) how can we differentiate between it and “man-made” climate? Like how would you tell the difference between each if both actually exist? Wouldn’t man-made climate therefore NOT exist?"
This is one of the most flawed arguments I've heard. We have the weather record stretching back more than 100 years, and then other data spanning back even more. A correlation has been established to exist between human pollution and global warming. Therefore, man-made climate change DOES exist.

"Why are peace loving environmentalists not overjoyed at Climate Gate proving the dangers has passed and was a mistake?"
Because "ClimateGate" proved no such thing.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM