Sir Paul McCartney's former wife is a woman with a past, that much we all knew. The former glamor model - who posed for a series of very explicit porn shots, which appeared in a German sex manual and earned her a bit of a "porn queen" reputation - was apparently still keen to display her nude charms at a later age. And judging by the latest leaked nude shot of Heather - dubbed "Mucca" by the British tabloids - it simply seems that Mills has a passion for displaying her naked body in an attempt to raise money, either for herself or charity.

This particular shot was taken by top fashion photographer Tony McGee in 1999, before Mills even met McCartney. She apparently posed naked, without her prosthetic leg and barely covering her breasts with one hand in the hope that the shots would promote her anti-land mine charity work. However, as we all know, Mills lost her leg in a motorcycle accident, therefore not in a circumstance that could be relevant to an anti-land mine awareness campaign, but some may argue it's unfair to question her motivation; therefore, we won't pursue this point any further. What does seem suspicious, however, is the fact that Mills tried to prevent her future husband learning about these shots, which points to the fact that her conscience wasn't exactly clear when she took them.

"Heather figured Paul would take a pretty dim view if suddenly a load of nude pictures of her came out. It wasn't just this shoot she worried about, there was the infamous porn-style German sex manual she starred in, too," a source reveals to the National Enquirer. As a result, when Mills got involved with the former Beatle, she used his social and financial standing to threaten anyone in position to release any of her nude shots. "Quite a few people got phone calls and she made it very clear that the McCartney legal team would come down like a ton of bricks if the pictures ever went public," the same source adds. It looks like Heather's disgust of sir Paul didn't apply back in the age when she was using his name to protect herself. There's a name for that kind of attitude: I may be wrong, but isn't it sometimes referred to as 'hypocrisy"?