Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Behavior/Humans

January 5th, 2011, 08:12 GMT · By

Harsh European Laws Curb Smoking and Passive Exposure

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Hars regulations seem to motivate people to quit smoking.
Enlarge picture
The Smoking Control Unit of the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), led a study that concluded the anti-tobacco laws in Europe actually have a very strong influence on the reduction of cigarette consumption and passive exposure to smoke.

The study included the 27 countries of the European Union and the results are based on the Eurobarometer survey on tobacco and on the Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) – that takes into account the main measures for smoking control at an international level.

Esteve Fernández Muñoz, co-author of the study and the Head of the Tobacco Control Unit of the ICO told SINC that the reform of the Spanish Law 28/2005 for smoking prevention “is an example of the very important progress in the control of smoking and means the abolition of the 'Spanish model' of supposed tolerance.

“The countries with the highest score in the TCS apply active control policies and the consumption of tobacco and the proportion of the population exposed to smoke, both at home and in the work place, is more reduced,” he added.

Spain obtained high scores at the TCS, but there are a few things that score rather low, and one of them is the low price of tobacco.

Fernández Muñoz said that Spain, “is one of the countries in Europe with the cheapest prices.”

And since “it has been demonstrated that increasing the price of tobacco is the most effective measure for controlling smoking (30 points out of 100 on the TCS scale) as compared with other action, such as, treatment to quit smoking (10 points on the TCS),” it seems that this will be the next step.

Experts said that anti-smoking measures should reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the short and medium-term, and also the incidence of cancer – mainly lung cancer, in the long-term.

According to statistics, in Spain, passive exposure to smoke only, leads to between 1,200 and 3,200 deaths per year due to lung cancer and heart attacks.

This new study has confirmed the hypothesis that the higher the restrictions, the lower the consumption and passive exposure to smoke, and countries like Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the UK are the best examples.

They adopt stricter controls on smoking, and their TCS scores speak for themselves: the cigarette consumption is 'relatively low' – 28.8% lower, as is exposure to smoke – 13.8% lower at home and 23.4% lower at work.

At the opposite end are Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg, where there are fewer control measures and smoking is 'relatively high' – over 30%, as well as the exposure to smoke – between 15% and 30% at home and between 15% and 36% at work.

The Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases has announced its intention to release a Request for Applications (RFA) on Implementation Research on Hypertension in Low and Middle Income Countries.

This new study was published in the magazine Plos One.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,015 hits · 5 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Depression Prevents Smokers from Quitting

Anti-Smoking Drugs Effective at Fighting Cravings

Cancer: Smoking Only Makes the Pain Worse

Menthol Cigarettes Make Some People More Addictive

Smoking Puts You at Risk for Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Carlos on 05 Jan 2011, 16:27 UTC reply to this comment

Since the price of tobacco products was increased in Spain more smokers are buying their tobacco products in other parts of Europe.
Since smoking was banned in pubs and people are smoking more outside, more people are exposed to harmless second hand smoke.


Comment #2 by: Phil J on 05 Jan 2011, 18:18 UTC reply to this comment

What a load of pro-tobacco cobblers this is! The ICO have introduced a 'points mean prizes' chart to determine what they wanted to determine in the first place-that smoke bans are a raging success!
Fernández Muñoz and other experts say that smoke bans 'should' reduce cardiovascular disease-note the word SHOULD! Heart Attack studies thus far (despite all the wierd and wonderful claims) have proved absolutely nothing with regard to reductions! In fact the I-O-Man study was so flawed I'm surprised the student from Northumberland University is still allowed to be part of the University!
Quote:- "According to statistics, in Spain, passive exposure to smoke only, leads to between 1,200 and 3,200 deaths per year due to lung cancer and heart attacks. "
Exactly-according to statistice, and just where do these statistics come from? Not actual proven deaths thats for sure! yet again, we are faced with estimations by people who want you to believe that no matter what the truth may be, 'they' are right! Estimations are of no scientific or factual use whatsoever.
He then goes on to state :- "This new study has confirmed the hypothesis that the higher the restrictions, the lower the consumption....." and quotes Ireland first! So, that is the studies credibility blown apart for the Irish government themselves admit that smoking rates have increased by 2% since the impementation of their ban!
How this fool comes up with cigarette consumption can be 28.8% lower when the above is in fact the truth, is totally beyond me, but then I didn't design a chart to show what I wanted it to show!
As with all these so called 'studies', the clue is in the title of the instigator "The Smoking Control Unit ......" I need say no more!


Comment #3 by: despairig on 05 Jan 2011, 19:03 UTC reply to this comment

Pathological is what the anti-smoking crusade has become, sadly the MSM are just as obsessed. Can't function without their press releases. A bit of real investigative journalism would tell even a half decent journalist all they need to know about the anti-smoking lobby


Comment #4 by: Kin on 05 Jan 2011, 23:24 UTC reply to this comment

One or two questions;

No comments on this fairy story with all the ficticious statistics - the most controvertial subject on the threat to freedom and tolerance in the world today?

Why do I suspect foul play and editorial restriction on reporting the full story or allowing others to fill in the glaring gaps?

Are all anti-smokers gullible idiots or just totally incompetent and think everyone else is too?

What is the relevance of measuring passive smoking when passive smoke has been shown to be LESS dangerous than drinking milk.

I and many many others have many many more questions that are being ignored or suppressed. The tide WILL come in whether you want it to or not


Comment #5 by: Tug Wilson on 06 Jan 2011, 20:04 UTC reply to this comment

Once again the word here is Control, it is a shame that the EU cannot produce the names of just a handful of people that have died from passive smoke to at least try and back-up all this Propaganda.The fact is they cannot. Passive smoke is not harmful but Tobacco Control will kill your Business if you own a Pub,Club or Bar that much we do know. It is Choice we need not Control.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM