Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Science > Behavior/Humans

June 26th, 2007, 18:16 GMT · By Stefan Anitei

Half of the Women See More Colors Than the Rest of the People Do

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Enlarge picture
Normally, people have three types of cone cells for daylight, for detecting different colors. But some women can see extra colors as they have four types of cone cell receptors. They are called tetrachromats. Compared to them, we all are color blind.

The first tetrachromat woman was discovered by researchers at Cambridge University in 1993. This is perhaps the most remarkable human mutation ever detected. The fact that all tetrachromats are female intrigued scientists. Now two scientists, working separately, want to investigate systematically for tetrachromats to clarify more about their existence and how they detect colors.

All mammals descended from nocturnal tree dwellers, which were colorblind, but the line of primates had more advantages in developing color vision for finding fruit food. Human color vision is based on three forms of iodopsin (color pigments), each sensitive to a different light wavelength and is found in a different cone type. When a different cone type is stimulated, the brain reads it as a particular color.

The three iodopsins respond to red, green and blue; all the other colors are their combinations. Like all pigments, iodopsins are proteins encoded by DNA genes. The genes encoding the "red" and "green" iodopsins are located on the X sex chromosome, while the "blue" iodopsin is on a non-sexual chromosome.

That's why color-blindness mostly affects men: 8% of the Caucasian males; while under 0.5 % of Americana women present it. Women have X chromosomes: one from the mother and one the father, while men have just one X chromosome from the mother and an Y sex chromosome from the father (this one does not contain any iodopsin gene).

X chromosomes can be a "green" iodopsine or a slightly shifted "green" iodopsine, and a "red" iodopsine and a shifted "red" iodopsine. That's why a woman can carry 5 types of iodopsins: these four plus "blue", while a man just three (a green type, a red one plus blue).

A recent paper by Kimberly Jameson, Susan Highnote
and Linda Wasserman of the University of California, San Diego, showed that up to 50 % of women carry 4 types of iodopsins and can employ their extra pigments in "contextually rich viewing circumstances".

For example, when looking at a rainbow, these females can segment it into about 10 different colors, while trichromat (with three iodopsins) people can see just seven: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet. For tetrachromat women, green was found to be assigned in emerald, jade, verdant, olive, lime, bottle and 34 other shades.

Still, the birds' abilities are even superior. Pigeons have five color receptors (and five types of cell receptors) and can process visual information up to 10 times faster than human beings. While we see a smooth TV image in real movement and color, they will see dull flickering lights.

Tetrachromats species are encountered among birds, insects, jumping spiders, reptiles, and amphibians, but no mammal is known to posses this. Some of them detect UV light.

Color-blindness means the lack of the ability to distinguish a certain color. The term is somewhat of a misnomer, as color perception is diminished, not eliminated. Real color-blindness, wherein a person can distinguish no color at all, requires an impairment of all three types of color receptors, and is found in just 0.003% of the population.

Dr. Gabriele Jordan of Cambridge University tested the color perception of 14 women who each had at least one son with the right kind of color-blindness. In a test, the subjects had to manipulate and blend two wavelengths of colored light to produce any hue they liked, and after that, they had to test their own results a second time.

With normal tricolor vision, several different combinations would match any given hue, with a tetrachromat the visible match would be much decreased. 2 of the 14 subjects showed exactly the results expected from a tetrachromat. One of the two reported having a different sense of color from the people around her, with a better color matching and color memory.

Some suggest that the tetrachromats are born with four types of cone cells. One research pointed out that 2-3% of the world's women may have the kind of fourth cone that lies between the standard red and green cones. Mutation in iodopsine genes is common in most human populations, and tetrachromacy could be linked to major red-green pigment mutations, linked to "color blindness" (protanomaly or deuteranomaly).
FILED UNDER:
eye
pigment
iodopsine
color


59,825 hits · 14 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Night Contact Lenses Restore Day Vision

Eye Movements Improve Memory Forming

Contact Lens Linked to Eye Infection

See the Nipple? It's Because of Your Jittery Eyes...

New Technique Offers 3-D Images of the Retina

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: caseman on 22 Sep 2007, 18:29 UTC reply to this comment

Tell me, in order to confirm the extra iodopsines, did they rip out a few eyeballs and analyze the proteins?
Or did they just do some psychology testing and take people's word for things?
After all, everyone knows women have a better sense of color, right? I mean, everyone knows that right? We don't have to an explanation that fits the laws of physics do we? After all, we all know it's true, so no real testing is needed.
Surely, their superior ability must be genetic instead of learned.
There may be some difficulty including the idea that people are usually able to distinguish about 2000-5000 colors, but trained professionals, such as painters, can distinguish about ten times as many. Oops, did I mention training? Those trained professionals must have chosen their fields because they had different genes, right? Must have.

Comment #1.1 by: Nafnaf on 23 Mar 2012, 01:45 GMT

They could have used the eyes of cadavers?
But yes, all you have to do is switch your computer between 8bit (256 colours), 16bit (65,000 colours) and 32bit (billions of colours) and the difference is noticeable.
Furthermore, it's been noted that the words used to identify colours when young affect the colours a person identifies. I forget specific examples, but something along these lines - in an African tribe where they only have names for green and red, the people cannot distinguish between blue and green.
Which in another tribe, they have 24 different names for shades of green, and the majority of their people can easily distinguish between each of those side-by-side, yet an English person may find it very difficult.

The tests for theese (as I recall) were similar to colour blind tests - they presented people with a circle of one colour which contained a circle of another. The test subject simply had to point o the area of the other colour.

With the first tribe, they couldn't identify the blue area inside the green circle, while with the second, they easily identified between two close shades of green.

Comment #1.2 by: MR on 26 Apr 2012, 11:39 GMT

They can do genetic tests with blood or saliva.


Comment #2 by: jimmy on 05 Mar 2010, 13:36 UTC reply to this comment

I don't see how this test involves physics.. I'd say it's more involved with biology. I don't think either relativity, thermodynamics, electromagnetism or quantum mechanics are going help explain this particular phenomenon but then I've been wrong before.
However, I would like to see the actual studies that were conducted to reach these conclusions. This is very interesting, and reminds me of something like absolute (dare i say perfect?) pitch for the ear.

Comment #2.1 by: Bob on 05 Mar 2010, 17:25 GMT

Actually, this has everything to do with physics. The dynamics of light can be explained through physics (wavelengths, as the article pointed out, are able to be measured in frequency and amplitude). But this also has everything to do with biology, as you've also pointed out.


Comment #3 by: randomsignal on 06 Mar 2010, 00:53 UTC reply to this comment

Interesting
Indications ranging from conversations that go something like:
Me "the colors are so beautiful"
Companion "What colors?"
to my unending quest for the perfect shade of green when no one else (except my daughter) can see the difference have made me wonder for years if there was really some physiological difference or if I just spent too much time with my giant box of crayons as a kid.
Also, I can almost always match colors (like thread or paint) from memory.

Nature &/or nurture?

Comment #3.1 by: Maggie on 16 Mar 2012, 20:33 GMT

I have very much the same experiences. Thought it was me LOL.

Comment #3.2 by: Jenn on 01 Apr 2013, 02:47 GMT

I'm a female and for some reason men don't always see the same colors as I do. Or they'll call something green when it's blue (at least, I'm seeing blue!). Often they call something orange or red, when I'm seeing pink. I don't know if it's just that we as women spend more time thinking about/worrying about color (fashion, make-up, etc.) so we just know the names of colors better, or if we are really seeing a different color than the men are?


Comment #4 by: matt on 06 Mar 2010, 15:27 UTC reply to this comment

Ya, perceiving color has nothing to do with electromagnetism or any other branch of physics. You're absolutely right that color is a biological phenomenon, with NO real basis in physics.

Learn what really goes on behind the scenes in nature, and you'll realize its ALL physics - if any observation can't reduce down and satisfy thermodynamic laws or physical laws (be it quantum or relativistic) then someone is missing something.


Comment #5 by: anon on 06 Mar 2010, 16:38 UTC reply to this comment

"Half of the Women See..." should be "Half of Women See...", "0.5 % of Americana women..." should be "0.5 % of American women".


Comment #6 by: gary on 06 Mar 2010, 19:24 UTC reply to this comment

So caseman, do you not take any medication? Because the vast majority of it is tested with "Do you feel better?"


Comment #7 by: Nils Lobie on 07 Mar 2010, 16:14 UTC reply to this comment

Well for one, physics involves the study of how light acts, so there is physics involved (in fact, pretty much anything involving biology can be also said to involve physics, a la http://www.xkcd.com/435/). And while training certainly is a factor, like those with perfect pitch, autistic savants, or Michael Phelps, these people have most probably relied on an initial genetic disposition, and have further trained and honed it, like Anakin Skywalker with The Force. Nature and nurture are not at odds here, they are working in concert.


Comment #8 by: Sparkler on 23 Dec 2011, 23:03 UTC reply to this comment

How do you tell if you have the fourth cone?


Comment #9 by: Benny Roc on 13 Feb 2013, 12:46 UTC reply to this comment

I have a question, maybe someone can answer it for me. I am not color blind at all. I can see all colors perfectly. What my problem is -- is that sometimes when looking at a color, I'm not able to recognize which color it is. Sometimes someone will ask me what color something is, and I can't answer their question. For example, I'll sometimes see something that is blue and call it purple (and vice versa) or see something that is Green and call it brown (and vice versa). I have done a little research and found that Color Agnosia is what I might have. Can anyone elaborate on any of this?? lol. Thanks.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM