Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Science > Nature

July 24th, 2012, 15:27 GMT · By

Greenland's Ice Sheet Melting at Unprecedented Pace

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Extent of surface melt over Greenland's ice sheet on July 8, 2012 (left) and July 12, 2012 (right)
Enlarge picture
Portions of Greenland's massive ice sheets have been melting faster over the past month than they have in over 30 years, announce investigators from the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), in Pasadena, California. Unfortunately, this trend is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.

The discovery should be extremely worrying for everyone, since Greenland is the world's second-largest, ground-based ice reservoir after Antarctica. If all of its ices melt, global sea levels would rise by 21 feet (6.4 meters), making cities such as New York and Tokyo history.

For July, investigators looked exclusively at the surface ice cover. They found it to be melting at an extremely high pace, which affected areas spanning from the coasts all the way to the ice sheet's thickest point, in the middle of the island.

At its deepest, this ice field is 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) thick, scientists note. The melting spree affected all areas of the island to different extents, but no region was left unaffected. The measurements that led to this conclusion were produced by three different satellites conducting independent studies.

Both NASA and a consortium of university scientists analyzed the data, and they too arrived at the same conclusion. Statistically, nearly 50 percent of the island's entire surface melts during the summer. However, this year appears to be different, in that a lot more ice could melt.

Satellite data indicate that no less than 97 percent of the entire ice mass surface thawed at some point during the last 2 weeks. At this point, there is no way of knowing for sure whether the event will impact global sea levels right now.

“The Greenland ice sheet is a vast area with a varied history of change. This event, combined with other natural but uncommon phenomena, such as the large calving event last week on Petermann Glacier, are part of a complex story,” researcher Tom Wagner explains.

“Satellite observations are helping us understand how events like these may relate to one another as well as to the broader climate system,” adds the scientist, who is the cryosphere program manager at NASA Headquarters, in Washington DC.

According to experts at JPL, this level of pronounced melting has not occurred in Greenland since 1889, when modern weather records began being kept. The situation is extremely severe, and will continue to degenerate even further as global warming makes its effects with increased vigor.

At this point, scientists are still hopeful that the event is part of a larger cycle, which sees ices on the island declining severely every 150 years or so. However, if the same readings are collected next year, then external factors are definitely influencing the process.


1,396 hits · 1 comment
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


SMOS Team Finally Shuts Down Interfering Radio Signals

Arctic Ice Extents Below Average This May

Arctic Sea Ices Declined Rapidly in June

CryoSat's Laser Altimeter Can Measure Sea Levels

Greenland Ice Core Samples Cannot Be Interpreted Unequivocally

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: JohnnyBadBoy on 01 Aug 2012, 23:32 UTC reply to this comment

Not all scientists felt this to be a surprise. The melt rate was predictable by 1985, using a boxed matrix within boxed matrix all interacting, with all relevant data fed in by used of expanding and diminishing Chinese triangles. I had completed the model in June, 1984. It was stolen in August of that year. Unless it was only used for military purposes, the information was to be had. The model predicted an acceleration that is a spiraling phenomenon. Linear predictions are childish, as are simple A+B=C. This planet is not only a living organism, if the definition of life is properly understood, but, it is far more dynamic that most of the scientific community seem to wish to understand. I was convinced that mainstream science simply did not want to know the truth, and therefore, while having explained my work to a few in the field, saw that the over compartmental-ism of study and knowledge had tainted the work of most researchers. I believe this is still the case. At any rate, the tipping point has been passed. Humanities contribution has irreversible effects. The will be, as is going on now, a slow and quiet catastrophe whose magnitude is increased much like a snowball 's when rolled in damp sticky snow. Truth has always be simple. I learned much simply by listening to so-called 'primitive' people. The only issue was to build an equation that would draw the picture, which was finished, now, nearly three decades ago. As I was at that time, an historical demographer, scientific journals showed no interest. I take no satisfaction in this, rather it is sad that the scientific community has so prostituted itself, and has in so many ways, come to resemble the inquisitors of the 16th century Roman Church. I certainly do not condemn all, yet we all are condemned by what is happening. When I turned over significant notes to a young British scientist working on climate change and deforestation in 1987, I really thought more would become of it. It is truly sad to see the state of affair in what has become 'academentia'. I remain convinced as do my 'primitive' friends, that all of this is interlocked, human social stagnation, the dictatorship of judgment or trial by committee, obvious and radical changes in human behavior, as well as those changes, radical to the same degree, in the behavior of this planet. Will I be mocked again for asserting that melting ice has accelerated seismic events, changed the rate of flow of the tectonic plates, and hence is having an effect of the movement of magma. I don't recall Leonardo having any degrees comparable to our most 'eminent' scientists. Is it really to late to as for collaboration? John Charles Heiser Sometimes to be reached at kualapilah77@hotmail Conflict among intellects is only good when it becomes part of a birthing process. Please remember that. And maybe read Kuehn again.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM