Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nature

March 9th, 2011, 10:38 GMT · By

Greenland, Antarctica Melting Faster than First Thought

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


This is the Ross Ice Shelf, in Antarctica, which is also melting at faster rates than previously calculated
Enlarge picture
The conclusions of a new scientific research bring about new concerns that two of the largest ice masses on the planet – Greenland and the Antarctic – are melting away at much faster rates than previously calculated.

There are significant implications to this discovery, experts say, especially in terms of what its effects will be on the world. These are two of the three vastest ice expanses in the world, alongside the Arctic.

In order to arrive at this conclusion, the research team analyzed data related to ice loss spanning more than 20 years. Scientists determined that ice loss from the two regions is now the primary driver of sea level rise across the world's oceans.

The phenomenon even surpassed that of ice loss from mountain glaciers and ice caps. This was predicted in climate models, but was not expected to take place so soon, LiveScience reports.

Experts compared ice loss rates for the past two decades, but especially in 2006. That year, another research team conducted a measurement of ice loss from glaciers and ice caps, and so the scientists had a reference frame to compare the two.

“That ice sheets will dominate future sea level rise is not surprising – they hold a lot more ice mass than mountain glaciers,” explains expert Eric Rignot, the lead author of the new investigation.

What is surprising is this increased contribution by the ice sheets is already happening,” adds the researcher, who holds joint appointment at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), in Pasadena, and at the University of California in Irvine (UCI).

Details of the research appear in this month's issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

For the purpose of the research, ice sheets were defined as being ice accumulations larger than 20,000 square miles (50 square kilometers). Such large amounts of ice are only found in Greenland and the Antarctic. Ice caps were defined as having a surface smaller than this threshold level.

On average, the two ice sheets lost 475 billion metric tons (gigatons) of ice yearly. As a result, global sea levels rose by 1.3 millimeters annually. In the 2006 comparison, mountain glaciers and ice caps lost 402 gigatons of ice.

The worrying news is that the ice sheets appear to be losing mass at an ever-accelerating rate, as the effects of global warming and climate change create feedback effects forcing more ice to melt.

“If present trends continue, sea level is likely to be significantly higher than levels projected by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007,” Rignot reveals.

Over the next 40 years, sea levels could rise by 5.9 inches (15 centimeters) if the trend persists. Add to this 3.1 inches (8 centimeters) from ice caps and 3.5 inches (9 centimeters) from ocean thermal expansion and you get 12.5 inches (32 centimeters) in less than half a decade.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

697 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Culprits Behind Antarctic Ice Sheets Collapse Identified

The Key to Penguins' Cold-Weather Coats

Arctic Ice Loss: Hybrid Animals and Extinction

Arctic Sea Ice Extent at Lowest Ever

February Ice Spread Lowest in History

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Eric on 09 Mar 2011, 20:53 UTC reply to this comment

Scary, but still not enough to move the political needle to point to action. Human societies are horrible at dealing with long-term problems. Even something that is lightning fast in geological time (40 years) is too long for humans to really care about; and that's just innate apathy. Throw in the outright denial of global warming disbelievers (who don't care about facts or science) and the situation is rather grim.

At least some scientists need to start thinking about worse-case scenarios and plan for global political inaction because I doubt the world is going to start making any real changes anytime soon.


Comment #2 by: philiponfire on 25 Jul 2011, 08:53 UTC reply to this comment

a decade is ten years, do you mean half a century?

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM