Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Science > Space

November 26th, 2009, 14:43 GMT · By

Future Ideas for Space Travel

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Voyager 1 will take thousands of lifetimes to reach the Sun's closest neighbor
Enlarge picture
Everyone knows that space is big. The thing about calling the Universe massive and what not is that no one can get a clear image of precisely what type of distances we're talking about. The closest star to our location would take the equivalent of 50 million Earth-Moon journeys to get too, or roughly 4.2 light-years. Other stars are thousands, millions, and billions of light-years away, so you do the math. For instance, Voyager 1, traveling at about 17 kilometers per second – the fastest speed of a human-built space probe, would take 74,000 years to get to Proxima Centauri, our closest stellar neighbor. So, how do we go about shortening these awfully-long times?

The common sense answer is fly faster, much faster. In fact, experts say, we should develop the technology to fly at close to the speed of light before we even think about leaving the solar system. According to our understanding of basic physics, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, which is a constant. Other interpretation says otherwise but, for practical applications, this constant needs to be used. Proposals on how these massive speeds can be achieved include ships propelled by repeated hydrogen bomb explosions, or by vast, laser-powered reflective sails, or even by the annihilation of matter and antimatter. Naturally, we would have to develop an antimatter drive first.

Experts at the Kansas State University even proposed spacecrafts that would be powered by artificial black holes. Some say that warping time is the way to go, as in construct a ship that is able to create a bubble of sorts around it, in which time would pass slower than on the outside of the bubble. This would allow for massively-long trips to take only a few human years. But all these ideas are not what puzzle physicists. What's really disconcerting is the fact that there is absolutely nothing in our understanding of physics to prevent us from building such machines. In other words, they are not sci-fi, NewScientist reports.

Some experts even propose a dark matter-fueled spaceship. The idea behind this proposal is based on solid astronomical knowledge. Dark matter makes up most of the contents of the Universe, and so the experts are proposing the construction of a vessel that would be able to collect dark matter as it moves, thus eliminating the need to carry the fuel it needs with it. The same type of design applies to a construct which plans to steal hydrogen from the interstellar medium, and force it into nuclear fusion aboard a spacecraft. The ship would then exhaust the by-products and obtain thrust. Sadly, in the matter of space exploration, only time will show which design works, and which is doomed to failure.


5,235 hits · 3 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Space-Elevator Contest Rescheduled for November 4

Protecting Other Planets from Cross-Contamination

Experts Wonder Who Will Own the Moon

Galileo Was Launched Two Decades Ago

Last Earth Flyby for Rosetta

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Igor Zilist on 27 May 2010, 21:53 UTC reply to this comment

My interest is the development of electromagnetic space propulsion to interact with
electromagnetic fields which permeate space- anyone interested in that?

Igor


Comment #2 by: Guled on 20 Sep 2010, 04:01 UTC reply to this comment

Why can`t we build hundreds of ships that travel at the sametime, so same can be used for supply cargo. those ship must be smart ships, able to solve any problem, fix and repair their own. same will fail but same may make. they must carry everything they need from earth. and never return but report back.

Comment #2.1 by: blitz n fire on 04 Jan 2011, 07:31 GMT

The problem is funding. What is the financial gain if they never come back? We have hard enough time seeing, if any, countries commititing to long term investments that would be longer then 1-2 human lifespans before getting back the initial investment. Who would fund one that would take thousands of years... even if we had this futuristic technology that would make it.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM