Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Apple > Mac

November 11th, 2010, 11:03 GMT · By

Flash Makes Up 42% of the 131 Vulnerabilities in Mac OS X 10.6.5

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Adobe Flash icon
Enlarge picture
A detailed analysis of Apple’s security patches included in the Mac OS X 10.6.5 update issued yesterday suggests that the Mac maker had good reason to phase out Flash from its computers starting with the introduction of two new MacBook Air models last month.

AppleInsider has broken down the 131 vulnerabilities known to be affecting Mac OS X prior to version 10.6.5 of the operating system, mentioning that 16 of them are related to X11, five to specific features in Mac OS X Server, nine to Apple’s own QuickTime player, one to the Safari web browser, and another 45 to various other components.

However, the web site notes, the security issues associated with the Adobe Flash plugin count no less than 55, making the Flash plugin the most security-vulnerable component touched by Mac OS X 10.6.5.

The source appropriately points out to Apple’s recent move to phase out Flash, as well as Java and X11, from its new Macs.

Going by the notes publicized by Apple in its Support document detailing the security content of Mac OS X 10.6.5, one can only conclude that the Mac maker had more than enough reasons to act this way.

In fact, responding to inquiries regarding the exclusion of Flash from its new Macs, Apple specifically stated that it had to do with security.

According to a statement provided by Apple spokesman Bill Evans, leaving out the plugin starting with the new MacBook Airs had nothing to do with Apple’s stance regarding Adobe’s software.

“We're happy to continue to support Flash on the Mac, and the best way for users to always have the most up to date and secure version is to download it directly from Adobe,” Evans said in a statement, according to Engadget.

Furthermore - although Apple has refrained itself from noting this - it appears that Flash can also drain MacBook Air batteries noticeably faster, according to several tests carried out by tech-site Ars Technica.

This can only be considered yet another factor contributing to Apple’s decision to leave out Flash from its Macs.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,491 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Apple Launches Standalone MainStage 2.1.2, Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.4

Apple Hasn't Bought Wi-Gear, CEO Says 'The Rumor Is False'

What’s New in Mac OS X 10.6.5 Server

About the Mac OS X 10.6.5 Client Update

iTunes Store Movies, Apple TV 2G Reach Japan

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Mac-user on 11 Nov 2010, 12:33 UTC reply to this comment

A few days ago I came along a website which was completely designed in Flash. About 30% of the battery in my MacBook Pro was consumed during my visit to this website. I stayed on this website for about 20 minutes. This means a website designed in Flash can discharge your battery in about an hour. That's ridiculous.

Which idiot decides to design a website in Flash anyway? In my opinion we have to make those web designers aware of these problems with Flash. Contact them and tell them their websites can't be visited on systems like the iPad, tell them their websites discharge a battery of a MacBook Pro within only one hour (while this same battery normally lasts for about six hours) and tell them Flash is a resource hog and very insecure software which has a lot of bugs and vulnerabities.

The Flash era has to end. It lasted for long enough. Time has come for HTML5 to take over.


Comment #2 by: scaredOSteve on 11 Nov 2010, 22:44 UTC reply to this comment

Take a closer look at Apple's notes on the security update:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4435

"The issues are addressed by updating the Flash Player plug-in to version 10.1.102.64. "

That's right: Adobe fixed those issues months ago, and Apple's only now getting around to including the latest version in their own updates.

Mac fan sites are spinning this to make Adobe look bad, but the astute reader will look past the headlines to realize that on this one Adobe came through just fine and it's Apple that dragged their feet.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM