Microsoft

Firefox 2.0 - No Match for IE7

There is a new safest browser, and it's not open source

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

5th of April 2007, 16:05 GMT

Adjust text size:

Just as Linux and Apple are perceived by default as the most secure operating systems on the market in comparison to Windows, Firefox has a big advantage over Internet Explorer in terms

of user protection. And the customer perception of the two browsers has rubbed off on the latest versions Firefox 2.0 and Internet Explorer 7. But is it just a case of customer perception or is there any truth to this?

I thought I would compile a vulnerability background check for both Firefox 2.0 and Internet Explorer 7. For the sake of the argument, I only considered the browsers' history starting with November 2006 and ending with March 2007, since they had close launching dates toward the end of October.

In this period of time, I managed to get my hands on three security updates for Firefox 2.0. One made available on December 19, 2006, one on February 23, 2007 and the final one on March 20, 2007. The first count reveals that 17 vulnerabilities that impacted Firefox 2.0 were fixed since the open source browser was released.

Out of the 17 resolved security issues, no less than eight were critical. Three have a severity rating of high, another three were considered to pose only a moderate risk to users, and yet another three presented a low threat.

From Microsoft, I was able to identify a total of four Cumulative Security Updates for Internet Explorer for November 14, December 12, January 9 and February 13. In March 2007, Microsoft did not release any security updates and this also covers Internet Explorer. However, out of the four Cumulative Security Updates for Internet Explorer, the November and December releases do not affect Internet Explorer 7. And the remaining two security updates patch a total of three vulnerabilities in IE7, one critical, one moderate and one with a severity rating of low.

TAGS:

Internet Explorer 7 | Firefox 2.0

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :

Today's News | Yesterday's News | News Archive

User opinions:

Comment #1 by: ravenspirit2k5 on 05 Apr 2007, 22:42 GMT	reply to this comment
Jesus, I need hip-waders on this site.

Comment #2 by: Lost Angel on 06 Apr 2007, 06:33 GMT	reply to this comment
Counting how many vulnerabilities are there by the number of patches is wrong - you need to count "security holes" themselves. Take two plastic bottles - make 10 holes of different sizes in them. Patch 3 in one and 7 in the other one. Would you still say that the one with fewer patches leaks less? This is what you're saying basically with this article.

Share your opinion:

SUBMIT PROGRAM \| ADVERTISE \| GET HELP \| SEND US FEEDBACK \| RSS FEEDS \| ENTER NEWS SITE \| ENGLISH BOARD \| ROMANIAN FORUM
© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved. Softpedia™ and the Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.	Copyright Information \| Privacy Policy \| Terms of Use \| Update your software \| Archive

NEWS CATEGORIES: